THERE HAS TO BE A PENALTY FOR NON-COMPLIANCE WITHIN THE DEADLINE FOR FOIA REQUESTS. Until there is a lawful penalty, the lazy, excuse-making nincompoops will continue to shield themselves from scrutiny. In the private sector, a boss makes a deadline, and employees can get fired if they don't meet it. We need Congress to put tough penalties in the law and the executive branch to enforce it. Mr. Siri, don't you agree?
it should come in the form of docking the pay of the head of the agency until the requests are granted, why should they get payed if they cant or wont do their job?
The FDA needs a complete overhaul and terminating employees would be a start. We don't need career government employees who refuse to follow the law. And Congress needs to give FOIA some teeth. Although still weak, AR added monetary penalties for non-compliance. They have totally forgotten who they work for, time to remind them.
They need time to "doctor" them up and redact over half on the info. Government wants to be our master and controller and yet they act like we are crazy for asking them to be at least somewhat transparent. The entire HHS needs to go. It has never served the citizen in a healthy or timely manner.
Isn't this something RFK Jr can take action on? Who's against transparency? Chat GPT helped me fill out a FOIA like 1 and half years ago I believe. I had read the 'Peanut Allergy Epidemic' and in it there was a passage saying that Merck requested a patent for an aluminum based adjuvant in isolation and their request was denied. But Chat GPT didn't see any documentation as to why. So it helped me submit a FOIA asking why the FDA rejected that request. To me that sounds like a big friggin story. And there is some sort of record of it, enough for the Peanut Allergy Epidemic to make that claim. Anyway, any help on that from anyone would be nice.
I looked into the first three “studies” that you list and then decided to not waste my time looking at the others, which I’ll explain why. The first three “studies” have glaring conflicts of interest in their funding source: the first one by Moderna; the second by Fauci’s NIAID; the third by Bill Gates, and many of the authors own stock in the company they’re testing for!
You’ve wasted my time and I don’t appreciate your disingenuous manipulation of our attention by presenting biased research and trying to pass it off as viable to make your point. Or, it's possible that you don't understand the significance of conflicts of interest in the conducting of valid and reliable research studies.
I didn't read them all, but based on your valid finding of the first studies, I picked a couple at random from the bottom. Two merely stated a non-specifed placebo was used, but the third said:
"Between April 1 and June 9, 2022, 1631 participants were randomly allocated in part A and 1623 received vaccinations on day 1 (685 [42%] received mRNA-1345 plus SIIV4, 249 [15%] mRNA-1345 plus placebo, and 689 [42%] SIIV4 plus placebo).
So there is some validity in the complaint about there were no placebos. But as I recall, Siri's broader charge against the vaccines is there is also no long term, merely the reaction of the immune system measured by anti bodies which may or may not indicate true efficacy and not long term results. Of course we know there are biased studies, but I suspect not all are faked. I am not a medical professional, and am ready to be corrected if I got this wrong.
Or maybe it's time to call out Aaron Siri for his lies of "COVID vaccine was never tested against a saline placebo control" like he stated to Congress while he LIED to them last year!
I’m sure you’d like to comment on the fact that the control arm, the placebo arm, was destroyed by Pfizer immediately upon approval and release of their bioweapon gene therapy.
You again with your misinformation? This terrible bot is so bad at it. Pull up just one evidence backing you claim if you can. The educated ones like Siri know the covid vaccine is the only one with a true placebo arm, and even that vaccine (or gene therapy as some call it) is a big disaster. We need better bots than this!
The C19 "vaccine" had a placebo group in phase II trials only up until the EUA was issued for it (and the Brook Jackson lawsuit against Pfizer and the FDA exposed that the Pfizer trials even up to phase II were fraudulent!), at which point the placebo group was injected with the "vaccine," thus destroying the placebo group, therefor never completing any phase III trials.
At this point, the EUA, wasn't an FDA-approved vaccine--i.e., substantiated by completed valid and reliable RCTs to prove safety and efficacy--and was issued on the EUA basis with the caveat that it "may be effective" (the only requirement of an EUA issued drug).
That's it, no completed phase III trials! Zero. Just Fauci et al spewing propaganda insisting the jabs were safe and effective: flat out lies and self-serving deception at our expense: financially as taxpayers, damaged health as human beings, and destroyed trust as citizens.
Thank you for your tireless efforts in unmasking the criminal “Hellth Care” cartel
I should add that the brilliant term “Hellth” was coined by the amazing @sashalatypova
If you’re not already reading her essays, now is a good time to start!
All because they are controlled by pHARMa.
Thank you for everything you are doing to protect our grandkids from these dangerous poisons!!
THERE HAS TO BE A PENALTY FOR NON-COMPLIANCE WITHIN THE DEADLINE FOR FOIA REQUESTS. Until there is a lawful penalty, the lazy, excuse-making nincompoops will continue to shield themselves from scrutiny. In the private sector, a boss makes a deadline, and employees can get fired if they don't meet it. We need Congress to put tough penalties in the law and the executive branch to enforce it. Mr. Siri, don't you agree?
it should come in the form of docking the pay of the head of the agency until the requests are granted, why should they get payed if they cant or wont do their job?
The FDA needs a complete overhaul and terminating employees would be a start. We don't need career government employees who refuse to follow the law. And Congress needs to give FOIA some teeth. Although still weak, AR added monetary penalties for non-compliance. They have totally forgotten who they work for, time to remind them.
Wow! Grrrrrr! Keep trying to do this hard work Mr. Siri.
Are the other parts of the government equally laggard? Or do they all have something to hide?
Aaron,
Been praying for you. Please release ™The Covid Audit:
https://WHOtoSTOP.org.
That's a Milchamet Mitzva
They need time to "doctor" them up and redact over half on the info. Government wants to be our master and controller and yet they act like we are crazy for asking them to be at least somewhat transparent. The entire HHS needs to go. It has never served the citizen in a healthy or timely manner.
Isn't this something RFK Jr can take action on? Who's against transparency? Chat GPT helped me fill out a FOIA like 1 and half years ago I believe. I had read the 'Peanut Allergy Epidemic' and in it there was a passage saying that Merck requested a patent for an aluminum based adjuvant in isolation and their request was denied. But Chat GPT didn't see any documentation as to why. So it helped me submit a FOIA asking why the FDA rejected that request. To me that sounds like a big friggin story. And there is some sort of record of it, enough for the Peanut Allergy Epidemic to make that claim. Anyway, any help on that from anyone would be nice.
Why haven’t you taken a position on the “no virus” findings. Eq Tom Cowan, Mark Bailey, Mike Yeadon?
Agree! I have requested MANY TIMES, and their is always a reason that the info I've requested can't be fulfilled!
Big thanks to Aaron, his razor sharp team and all they do for thehighwire.com
Were any delays caused by slipping in DOGE pee?
👍👍👍
Are you still lying about the COVID vaccines have "zero saline placebo controlled trials"?
LMAO what a liar you are:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24005231?via%3Dihub
https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa2109522
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37099299/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32877576/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33887209/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36260859/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35544369/
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11040406/
https://academic.oup.com/ofid/article/12/1/ofae718/7922586
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34043894/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33301246/
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2639-4
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34910859/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34192426/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36260859/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34587382/
https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJM200104263441701
I looked into the first three “studies” that you list and then decided to not waste my time looking at the others, which I’ll explain why. The first three “studies” have glaring conflicts of interest in their funding source: the first one by Moderna; the second by Fauci’s NIAID; the third by Bill Gates, and many of the authors own stock in the company they’re testing for!
You’ve wasted my time and I don’t appreciate your disingenuous manipulation of our attention by presenting biased research and trying to pass it off as viable to make your point. Or, it's possible that you don't understand the significance of conflicts of interest in the conducting of valid and reliable research studies.
I didn't read them all, but based on your valid finding of the first studies, I picked a couple at random from the bottom. Two merely stated a non-specifed placebo was used, but the third said:
"Between April 1 and June 9, 2022, 1631 participants were randomly allocated in part A and 1623 received vaccinations on day 1 (685 [42%] received mRNA-1345 plus SIIV4, 249 [15%] mRNA-1345 plus placebo, and 689 [42%] SIIV4 plus placebo).
So there is some validity in the complaint about there were no placebos. But as I recall, Siri's broader charge against the vaccines is there is also no long term, merely the reaction of the immune system measured by anti bodies which may or may not indicate true efficacy and not long term results. Of course we know there are biased studies, but I suspect not all are faked. I am not a medical professional, and am ready to be corrected if I got this wrong.
Or maybe it's time to call out Aaron Siri for his lies of "COVID vaccine was never tested against a saline placebo control" like he stated to Congress while he LIED to them last year!
I’m sure you’d like to comment on the fact that the control arm, the placebo arm, was destroyed by Pfizer immediately upon approval and release of their bioweapon gene therapy.
You again with your misinformation? This terrible bot is so bad at it. Pull up just one evidence backing you claim if you can. The educated ones like Siri know the covid vaccine is the only one with a true placebo arm, and even that vaccine (or gene therapy as some call it) is a big disaster. We need better bots than this!
The C19 "vaccine" had a placebo group in phase II trials only up until the EUA was issued for it (and the Brook Jackson lawsuit against Pfizer and the FDA exposed that the Pfizer trials even up to phase II were fraudulent!), at which point the placebo group was injected with the "vaccine," thus destroying the placebo group, therefor never completing any phase III trials.
At this point, the EUA, wasn't an FDA-approved vaccine--i.e., substantiated by completed valid and reliable RCTs to prove safety and efficacy--and was issued on the EUA basis with the caveat that it "may be effective" (the only requirement of an EUA issued drug).
That's it, no completed phase III trials! Zero. Just Fauci et al spewing propaganda insisting the jabs were safe and effective: flat out lies and self-serving deception at our expense: financially as taxpayers, damaged health as human beings, and destroyed trust as citizens.