What About ACIP’s Non-Voting Members?
Pharma still has most of the seats at the table
Recently, Secretary Kennedy made some changes to the voting membership of CDC’s vaccine committee. However, the voting members are surrounded by 36 non-voting members who all shill for industry interests at the expense of vaccine safety.
A next step toward bringing just a bit of balance would be to add the following groups to the list of non-voting members:
• Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN)
• Medical Academy of Pediatrics & Special Needs (MAPS)
• Physicians for Informed Consent
• Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS)
The Secretary of HHS already has this authority directly under ACIP’s charter, as it allows for “such other non-voting liaison representatives as the Secretary deems necessary.”
This small change would bring us a bit closer toward making CDC a place that works for people and not pharma interests when it comes to vaccines.
What doesn't make sense is that pharma can easily manipulate data to make studies look good.
They did this with Vioxx and SSRIs, both of which have huge issues.
Yet they didn't do this with the COVID trial, which showed issues despite the propaganda saying safe and effective.
Same for the new shots, whether mRNA rsv or the new infusions, all of which show more issues vs placebo.
It makes you wonder why pharma is handing the FDA data that shows issues and the FDA just rubber stamps it.
Perhaps it's a game of blackmail or an insurance policy to protect big pharma? Who knows with these insane corrupt politicians.
Also, why is Kennedy not stopping the COVID emergency that his predecessor extended to 2029???? It's purely his call, no extra approval needed!
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/not-for-sale-an-open-letter-to-hhs
Thank you, Arron, for making the truth known about this and so many other vax playbooks and the Coup d’état. You are a litigator's litigator. I have great confidence that your voice will be heard on this topic.