279 Comments

Aaron thank you for fighting this war for all of us.

Expand full comment

God bless you Aaron.

Expand full comment

Aaron, you jewel ~ warrior and hero.

Don't let them or us burn you out!

Expand full comment

Won't happen. God is on the side of right. Keep doing the right thing.

Expand full comment

Yes and Thank you so much for allowing commenting on here. Writers and thinkers need to stick together and this is a great way to on Substack.

What is the root cause of most of our problems?

THE SYSTEMS THAT GOVERN OUR LIVES HAVE BEEN CORRUPTED

This is our #1 issue. We cannot rank anything higher than this issue. It is an issue we can and should all agree on. All political sides and all people.

It is like having a computer that has been hacked and corrupted. When we sit here arguing about hot button issues that is like arguing about what programs run better on the corrupted computer. NONE of them run better. Not until we fix the system. We have to put all of our attention on focusing the ACTUAL SYSTEM first. It's not that hard to do actually. We just need a movement. A decentralized one. And a plan.

What is the solution? Our systems have been corrupted by regulatory capture and special interest groups - we can't expect the system to fix itself. We need a NEW idea. One that makes the old one obsolete.

If our problem is systemic corruption the best cure is radical FORCED TRANSPARENCY.

I beg all of you to read this:

https://joshketry.substack.com/p/what-we-need-is-a-transparency-movement

Expand full comment

4 months to produce the vaccines, 75 years to tell us how they determined they're "safe."

Expand full comment

There is obviously something in the first 165,000 pages that they don’t want being seen until May when by that time they’ll have even more people jabbed and potentially dead. They are simply trying to delay being exposed.

Expand full comment

It is telling, isn't it?

Expand full comment

Screaming, more like.

Expand full comment

Shame on people who continue to believe the lies. They’re either culpable, lazy or stupid.

Expand full comment

How about all three.

Expand full comment

How about all three.

Expand full comment

Good point.

Expand full comment

What is the root cause of most of our problems?

THE SYSTEMS THAT GOVERN OUR LIVES HAVE BEEN CORRUPTED

This is our #1 issue. We cannot rank anything higher than this issue. It is an issue we can and should all agree on. All political sides and all people.

It is like having a computer that has been hacked and corrupted. When we sit here arguing about hot button issues that is like arguing about what programs run better on the corrupted computer. NONE of them run better. Not until we fix the system. We have to put all of our attention on focusing the ACTUAL SYSTEM first. It's not that hard to do actually. We just need a movement. A decentralized one. And a plan.

What is the solution? Our systems have been corrupted by regulatory capture and special interest groups - we can't expect the system to fix itself. We need a NEW idea. One that makes the old one obsolete.

If our problem is systemic corruption the best cure is radical FORCED TRANSPARENCY.

I beg all of you to read this:

https://joshketry.substack.com/p/what-we-need-is-a-transparency-movement

Expand full comment

They didn't say WHICH May...

Expand full comment

when may comes they will need august, then octovber, then january

Expand full comment

What is the root cause of most of our problems?

THE SYSTEMS THAT GOVERN OUR LIVES HAVE BEEN CORRUPTED

This is our #1 issue. We cannot rank anything higher than this issue. It is an issue we can and should all agree on. All political sides and all people.

It is like having a computer that has been hacked and corrupted. When we sit here arguing about hot button issues that is like arguing about what programs run better on the corrupted computer. NONE of them run better. Not until we fix the system. We have to put all of our attention on focusing the ACTUAL SYSTEM first. It's not that hard to do actually. We just need a movement. A decentralized one. And a plan.

What is the solution? Our systems have been corrupted by regulatory capture and special interest groups - we can't expect the system to fix itself. We need a NEW idea. One that makes the old one obsolete.

If our problem is systemic corruption the best cure is radical FORCED TRANSPARENCY.

I beg all of you to read this:

https://joshketry.substack.com/p/what-we-need-is-a-transparency-movement

Expand full comment

Insanity. And, people lined up in droves for the jab fearful of a virus that for most of us had over a 99% survival rate. The insanity of it all.

Expand full comment

What is the root cause of most of our problems?

THE SYSTEMS THAT GOVERN OUR LIVES HAVE BEEN CORRUPTED

This is our #1 issue. We cannot rank anything higher than this issue. It is an issue we can and should all agree on. All political sides and all people.

It is like having a computer that has been hacked and corrupted. When we sit here arguing about hot button issues that is like arguing about what programs run better on the corrupted computer. NONE of them run better. Not until we fix the system. We have to put all of our attention on focusing the ACTUAL SYSTEM first. It's not that hard to do actually. We just need a movement. A decentralized one. And a plan.

What is the solution? Our systems have been corrupted by regulatory capture and special interest groups - we can't expect the system to fix itself. We need a NEW idea. One that makes the old one obsolete.

If our problem is systemic corruption the best cure is radical FORCED TRANSPARENCY.

I beg all of you to read this:

https://joshketry.substack.com/p/what-we-need-is-a-transparency-movement

Expand full comment

🎤 🎤🎤🎤🎤👍

Expand full comment

Pfizer only tested them for 3 months.

Expand full comment

Out of the 42,086 trial participants 3 % dead and 28% severely disabled . Could be doubled as 10,000 who took the shot would not call Pfizer back to take the 2nd. Children were trialed 30 of them and they were not suppose to be in the trial . 11% severely disabled.

Expand full comment

I work for a company that has a platform that allows large organizations to perform eDiscovery and redactions on large datasets. I know for a fact that, with pattern search and export we could process the entire workload of 500,000 documents in less than 24 hours. Then have reviewers spend about a week ensuring proper redaction, then export the dataset in less than a day. The fact that they do not have technology in place that can do this is phenomenal. I guarantee Pfizer has an eDiscovery platform for these types of defensive discoveries. If they miss production of requested Discovery product they can be fined, daily, until they do.

Expand full comment

I agree, my son works for an AI software company In London for ediscovery and that review platform is incredible.

Expand full comment

I guess if you never intend to produce anything, there's no reason to invest in doing so quickly.

Expand full comment

Actually just speaking to my son he said yes, the company he works for runs the documents and the redactions

Expand full comment

Is it just a big black ink roller?

Expand full comment

Great comment, I giggled. Reminded me of some of the example documents that Ron Johnson presented in the press conference last weekend. He had pages where the whole page had been redacted.

Expand full comment

This is what EU globalist clicq disclosed to parlamentarists who asked for a copy of Pfizer purchase agreement under European freedom of information laws

This is a purchase agreement for products paid for from taxpayers money.

From 1:20

https://www.bitchute.com/video/dlWkN7S6b8Pr/

Expand full comment

I saw those pages Ron Johnson held up during the press conference too. Amazing, huh?

Expand full comment

Great minds? That was exactly the image I had.

Expand full comment

Great info!

Expand full comment

Not fines. Liability shield should be withdrawn if they cant oblige their

public health responsibility.

Expand full comment

Why hasn't the public pressured Congress to allocate funds to purchase such tech? Hmmm? A lot of things that appear shady in the Executive Branch actually comes from the Legislative Branch. Almost no one cares who is placed in the latter which is responsible for overseeing the entire fed gov it created and has the power to stop wrongdoing very quickly.

So, the public creates and tolerates a corrupt and dysfunctional Legislative Branch which then impedes or creates dysfunctionality in the Executive Branch. Go work for any entity in the latter to see firsthand how individual Congressional creatures will stall or reverse things you want to accomplish.

Expand full comment

Some departments have this tech, I would think it would be a no-brainer for ALL depts...but then again I work in the industry.

Expand full comment

Aaron, I'm extremely grateful for what you are doing. As an independent scientist, this is UNACCEPTABLE!

From the Australian Nonclinical Evaluation Report and the biodistribution study:

“Parturition: One ~ in the BNT162b3 group was euthanised on LDl showing hunched posture, pale, marked piloerection, bleeding at the vulva, distended/purple abdomen. One ~ each in the BNT162bl and BNT162b3 groups were euthanised due to all stillborn pups or total litter death. No macroscopic findings were noted in maternal necropsy.”

Fetal malformations/variations were found in the pups of dams in the treatment groups.

Also of concern:

Genotoxicity

No genotoxicity studies were conducted for the vaccine

Carcinogenicity

Carcinogenicity studies were not conducted.

2-[(Polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide (ALC-0159) and ((4-

hydroxybutyl)azanediyl) bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate) (ALC-0315) are novel excipients

and are not listed on the TGA' s ingredient database.

ALC-0315 (the ester formulation) was minimally metabolized and only 1% was excreted

ALC-0159 (the amide formulation) was more completely metabolized and only 50% was excreted

These novel LNP have very long elimination half-lives, especially ALC-0315 (the ester formulation), which is extremely concerning.

These data prove that the LNP are distributed systemically, not broken down efficiently, and stay in the body for a long period of time. Not only that, but the spike (S) protein expression can occur anywhere in the body, reaches high levels of expression, and may be of long duration (possibly mimicking the length of time antibody titers remain elevated.)

The biodistribution study is also very alarming because it shows that these LNPs accumulate not only at the injection site but also immediately to the liver, spleen, kidneys, and lymph nodes with rising concentrations (at 48 hours, the longest timepoint measured) in the ovaries, bone marrow, thyroid gland, pituitary gland, heart, and lungs. I have not had time to curve fit and mathematically extrapolate the tissue concentrations to further timepoints.

We need more data to better evaluate the safety of these experimental products before they even think of mandating them for children. Please contact the Washington State Board of Health and voice your concerns. https://zanaacarverphd.substack.com/p/mandates-for-children

Expand full comment

Glad to know people like you are following and commenting on these posts.

Expand full comment

Excellent comment.

Do you have a link to the information you cited.

Expand full comment

Yes, and I have the English translated version of the biodistribution study in PDF but I don't have the online link for the translated PDF.

References

https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/rmp-summary/comirnaty-epar-risk-management-plan_en.pdf

Nonclinical Evaluation Report: BNT162b2 [mRNA] COVID-19 vaccine (COMIRNATY ™) 2021. Submission No: PM-2020-05461-1-2 Sponsor: Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd. https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/foi-2389-06.pdf

https://www.pmda.go.jp/drugs/2021/P20210212001/672212000_30300AMX00231_I100_1.pdf

Expand full comment

Thank you.

There is a way to turn the pdf into a link I'm told though I have never been able to do so.

We are in exchanges with the higher-ups at one of the Ivy League schools and all they will debate is "the science" of the vaccines and hardly that.

It's an amazing exchange over the last 4 months were we cite copious documentation from peer-reviewed papers and they cite the NY Times and the CDC.

Not kidding.

The reason we are continuing is in the event of a lawsuit for those who get damaged from these injections and for those (like myself) who have lost their jobs due to the mandates.

Expand full comment

Thank you! I found it.

https://archive.org/details/pfizer-confidential-translated/

Jessica’s repeat dose article: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/the-shortcoming-of-the-repeat-dose

In Japanese: https://www.pmda.go.jp/drugs/2021/P20210212001/672212000_30300AMX00231_I100_1.pdf

Clinical Safety Summary: file:///C:/Users/Zana%20Carver/Desktop/VAERS%20Analysis/STN-125742_0_0-Section-2.7.4-summary-clin-safety.pdf

Clinical Overview: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/STN-125742_0_0-Section-2.5-Clinical-Overview.pdf

Source for Pfizer documents: https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/

Expand full comment

Filled out the questionnaire!

Expand full comment

Thank you for posting these details!

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
January 26, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

You're right. Thanks, I'll make a Substack post on this.

Expand full comment

That's an excellent question and I have one for you in return. How is organized crime allowed to happen? My guess is financial incentives, conflicts of interest, oh and let's not leave out that Dr. Fauci's wife is the Bioethics Committee Chair of either the NIH or NIAID.

Expand full comment

I think that fact was in the Pfizer study materials given to FDA:

https://bailiwicknewsarchives.files.wordpress.com/2021/12/2020.11-pfizer-biontech-c4591001-clinical-protocol.pdf

P. 72 - no pharmacokinetics, no pharmacodynamics, no genetics, no bio markers

Japan bio distribution study Byram Bridle got in Spring 2021 included some of those:

https://pandemictimeline.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Pfizer-bio-distribution-confidential-document-translated-to-english.pdf

Expand full comment

I would think that Pfizer would be proud of it's pet project and want the public to know as much as possible about their novel creation in order to stimulate more demand.

Huh, kinda weird that a company that has been bragging about their "life-saving invention" would want to hide their genius from us.

Although I'm gonna have to lean towards Pfizer just wanting to sweep this info under the rug in order to maintain a well-earned proprietary advantage rather than wanting to hide falsification of data, rigging of trials and colossal corruption.

They wouldn't do that would they?

Expand full comment

I am starting to wonder if a careful perusal of data will find evidence of falsification, easily found by forensically experienced data miners.

Expand full comment

I suspect submitted data meets whatever standards were established otherwise the company and execs could be held liable. They seem very touchy on this point which is why Comirnaty is available abroad but not in the US yet.

Liberal redacting may prevent the public from seeing data that should have prevented approval. I never realized the control group in these studies is given another "vaccine" not saline. To me, that's wrong. Participants who don't complete the full requirements are dropped without needing to mention it was due to some or all of them being harmed. Who knows what else is allowed in the acceptable standards.

I don't know whether or not this is true, but Robert Kennedy has mentioned Dr. F controls all the scientists, employers, and schools involved in this area of science by controlling their money stream and access to patent rights. It'll be interesting to see what exactly they'll be releasing.

Expand full comment

I think they actually attempted to use an inert placebo in this study due to all the criticism from past trials. That is probably why their data sucks and they don't want to show it. It is also telling that they unblinded the study after roughly 3 months and offered the shot to the placebo group. Only a vaccine fanatic would sign up for a trial like this to begin with, so of course they all took the shot when offered. Bingo, control group disappears.

Expand full comment

You're exactly right. The Canadian COVID Care Alliance wrote an excellent piece on all of the problems with the clinical trials, https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/

Expand full comment

Fauci funds millions in grants , he has a multi Billion $ research funding account, he's chief purser, so it's safe to say he also controls what is studied and the skew of any unfavorable outcomes. , or spin. It's a totally corrupt system , if you get on his bad side there goes your funding , any partnerships are toast, and other universities with research labs will shun whoever he says to. Any peer reviewed studies are written by the same stooges, same goes with the smack-down articles. Deep pockets flow both directions and there is serious Billions flowing to these soulless parasites.

Expand full comment

Yes, I completely agree!

Expand full comment

Maybe the contracted with Surgisphere for some fake data? I mean that happened....so?

Expand full comment

At this point, nothing would surprise me. Thacker PD. 2021. Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial. BMJ 375:n2635.

Expand full comment

Excellent point!

Expand full comment

Pfizer has paid billions in fines, some cases include fraud, you may know. It's available online.

Expand full comment

Disagree - don’t forget Moderna has this tech too. I’m leaning towards the info making it clear the safety issue with the Lipid Nanoparticles was never resolved, and the FDA went ahead and approved it anyway. See Whitney Webb’s work on Moderna on Unlimited Hangout if you want to know more of what I’m alluding to.

Expand full comment

They needed an experimental arm where just the unusual and novel adjuvants were given--the lipid nanoparticles. We have no data on just what these do alone, and how many of the bad outcomes they account for.

Expand full comment

Agreed! And I thank all of you for making most of this chaos understandable….in addition you give me hope that Real Science is still “breathing” and not on life-support (not intubated…? Lol).

Expand full comment

I think we are in agreement- I was being sardonic.

I've read that article- it's a great piece and Webb is one of the top journalists around.

Expand full comment

To me they are just trying to buy time until the release of the new vaccine, then they will argue that they don't need to release info for the original as its not in use anymore. Sweep it all under the rug and start fresh in the courts, pay more money to drag out hearings and hope that they can get a different decision this time. All the while people will continue to die at higher rates from the current doses that have been administered. If they do this long enough there will be no one left to oppose their agenda. The ones that do will be that much easier to round up and suppress. Just my opinion, maybe I'm way off.

Expand full comment

"They wouldn't do that would they?" And water isn't wet is it?

Expand full comment

So well written --it is a pleasure to read. Sadly, delay is the name of the game, especially because buying time is of the utmost priority to these criminals. And next time, they will make sure they have the courts in line. No one could fight this better than you.

Expand full comment

Please keep up the good work. This FDA behavior is criminal, dishonest and shows a complete disrespect for the American public.

Expand full comment

Any chance this delay is related to the bill announced a few days ago to get the COVID vaccines on the childhood schedule in California? Rushing that through before the data gets out?

Expand full comment

Bobby Kennedy explained this, once it is on the childhood scheduled, liability shields permanent, it is a race to get this done.

Expand full comment

These documents were WRITTEN and, supposedly, reviewed (I would hope THOROUGHLY) in less than 6 months, probably far less. But, now, they need 75 years to review and release. Hmmm, yeah, sounds legit. These guys KNOW the vaxxes are killing and permanently injuring millions of people - THAT is what they are desperately trying to hide.

Expand full comment

ALSO, the fact the studies were poorly designed and run and needed fraudulently eliminating all bad reactions from the tested group.

Expand full comment

The trials were supposed to continue for several years but they were unblinded after couple of mths only and placebo group were offered vaccines. So the control group is mostly gone now.

https://rumble.com/vqx3kb-the-pfizer-inoculations-do-more-harm-than-good.html

Also serious Pfizer tests data integrity issues at subcontractor's site were reported by BMJ.

https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635

(FB cenzored this publication, BMJ editors in chief went ballistic over this in open letter to Zuckerberg https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635/rr-80)

If all this Pfizer manipulation is not criminal (and FDA issuance of EUA based on such trials data) I do not know what is.

Expand full comment

And now we will all realize that there was no way scientists reviewed all these data, had the time or resources to do it properly.

Expand full comment

" you have to take shot, and then maybe later find out what's in it.." N. Pelosi

Expand full comment

It took FDA only 108 days to review/analyze them in order to issue EUA.

Expand full comment

Shoot, everyone who took the vaxx will be dead by then.

Expand full comment

Why do they need to review the documents? Don't they need to just release them?

Am I missing something?

Expand full comment

Didn't they ALREADY review the documents!?! Isn't that what the EUA was supposed to be based on? Or was handing in a big stack of paper all that mattered?

Expand full comment

Exactly my thinking.

Plus, surely they can't use this excuse of not having time, when they managed it before?

Expand full comment

I know there was a doctor in Australia that did a FOIA request, or equivalent, on the their regulatory body for confirmation that the body had received the raw Pfizer data. The answer was NO. I downloaded the document here:

https://sbit.workplace.datto.com/filelink/38443-32c85ccd-0256f4f7d6-2

Refer

https://spectator.com.au/2021/08/most-covid-patients-at-israeli-hospital-fully-vaccinated-what-does-this-mean-for-australia/

What is even more concerning is that, as alerted to by the Doctors for Covid Ethics, a Freedom of Information request to the Australian drugs regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration that granted provisional approval to the Pfizer vaccine, confirms that it has never seen the study data.

In other words, the TGA never saw or requested the patient data from Pfizer and simply accepted their reporting of their study as true. This means that when the head of the TGA John Skerritt said that “the safety evidence is pretty thorough” on February 6, his words would ring hollow to most Australians who have assumed, rightly or wrongly, that the TGA had actually looked at the patient data before granting any such approval.

As noted by Doctors for Covid Ethics on its website, it is currently not known whether any of the major government agencies around the globe (FDA, MHRA or EMA) has independently verified, or attempted to verify, Pfizer’s data, before proceeding with provisional/emergency authorisation of Pfizer’s mRNA therapy vaccine.

Expand full comment

If they have not that would certainly explain the hard push to not release the data, as this would have the potential to show not only any serious issues but also that these issues were entirely missed by the regulatory bodies that were specifically supposed to look for them.

Expand full comment

It sounds like they need to be reviewed for redaction of PPI only. I think?

Expand full comment

privacy for those in the 42,000 person trial. like they would not sign a waiver in any event.

Expand full comment

Apparently there may be personal information (names? contact info?) in some of them.

Expand full comment

Data would have been de-identified long ago

Expand full comment

So that "PPI" stuff is all B.S. Makes sense.

Expand full comment

I have a family member who used to work for Pfizer, he said they follow the money not the science

Expand full comment

Pfizer is a criminal organization, and has been for a very long time. Take a look at the 'research' they conducted in East Germany in the 1980's. The new business model is even better: governments use tax dollars to buy the experimental product and then mandates the public to take it or be shut out of society. They have the taxpayer paying to be a forced guinea pig!

All the while Pfizer hides behind government liability waivers and fights to keep the truth quiet.

Expand full comment

Booster Shots causing more cases of Lymphadenopathy is probably one reason of many

https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/booster-shots-causing-more-cases

Expand full comment

You are an awesome attorney

Expand full comment

It’s all so astounding. The fact that they (Pharma, FDA, government) not only approved, but mandated these injections, we are ‘terrorists and criminals’ if we don’t want to take them, or even simply talk about them negatively, and in reality they are the criminals, corrupt on the grandest scale possible

Expand full comment

My heart swells up (not from the injections) with such great appreciation for Aaron, as well as all the freedom fighters. You give me something to be hopeful for ❤️

Expand full comment

Thank you Aaron. God bless you, your work and your entire team.

I have one question. This appears to be evidence that no one who was injected was properly consented. Can the injured and survivors of the dead sue because of this lack of consent?

Expand full comment