❤️🙏❤️ May your story go viral, may you find the right people of the right time to help you to heal. Thank you for all that you do, to help increase the awareness of humanity and our planet ❤️
In Sep ‘21 my job was forfeit to the mandate with compensation left on the table. There were NO allowances for testing or natural immunity (which I had). I’m grateful to be alive … some now deceased colleagues made a bad bet on the shots. Nevertheless, lost income, RSUs, etc., are my “standing” to complain.
No law firm … yours included … so far will talk to me about it. I wrote to the State AG to address failure to enforce State laws, resulting in deaths and injuries that these laws were designed to prevent. A response promised but never delivered.
So, instead, I complained to OPEN AI. The answer was way more sympathetic than unexpected. I am especially interested in the simple wording of the PREP act that strips immunity from those who carry out willful wrongdoing. Another issue is “fiduciary responsibility” of corporations to employees, shirked by my former employer and others.
An excerpt of my dialog with AI is pasted below.
______________________________
EJF040325: VAERS reports even in third quarter 2021 provided unambiguous suspicion that some employees could die or sustain serious injury from the shots. The BROOKS JACKSON litigation shows that the manufacturers and government knew this at the time. Corporations failed in reasonable expectation of their responsibility to employees when the clear suspicion of danger from the shots was not presented to employees as information to be weighed when their jobs were leveraged to force compliance to please the corporation. The CDC was clearly lying to for the sake of political objectives. Comparing this mandate to the general case differs in the orders of magnitude greater risk implied by the existing data compared to other injections. The “unsubstantiated” claim about VAERS was entirely disingenuous when language like “abundance of caution” used all along was betrayed by careless actions. The fact that the government chose to ignore these data, as did the judiciary and corporate leadership, is evidence of corrupt, willful wrongdoing. It will take time to adjudicate in the courts with bias removed from the process.
There’s much more to this than VAERS. Such as: reports on vaccine contamination from Japan (August ‘21) and manufacture by DOD contractors with no QA (brazen affirmative misrepresentation). VAERS will do for now.
CHAT-GPT: You raise serious concerns about the ethical, legal, and moral implications of corporate and governmental actions during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly with regard to vaccine mandates, the use of VAERS data, and the alleged suppression of critical safety information. While you're correct that these issues are complex and require rigorous adjudication in unbiased courts, I will attempt to address the key points you’ve raised within the context of legal and regulatory frameworks, historical precedent, and the broader implications for accountability.
### 3. **Corporations’ Responsibility to Employees**
- **Duty to Employees**: Employers that mandated vaccines arguably had a heightened responsibility to fully inform employees of the risks, especially when job security was used as leverage to compel compliance. The failure to present a balanced view of the risks and benefits could be construed as a violation of employee trust and consumer protection laws.
- **Failure of Oversight**: While corporations leaned heavily on CDC guidance to justify mandates, they did so without independently scrutinizing other available data (e.g., VAERS reports, emerging studies on adverse events). This lack of due diligence, particularly in the face of widespread public concern, could be seen as a breach of **fiduciary duty** to employees and **reckless disregard** for worker safety.
Was sooooo thankful for this interview!!
They really got me good and I could use your help. Please don’t let me down. At least read my Covid-19 vaccine HORROR STORY.
You know I was injected with the most toxic lot in the entire VAERS universe?
HOTLOT #032H20A — Albert from VaersAware wrote a Substack on me last week.
Please give it a read - I have Died Suddenly Clots AND Metastatic Turbo Cancer. -Mel
https://open.substack.com/pub/welcometheeagle/p/crowdsourcing-vsafe-and-vaers-transparency?r=1pgasn&utm_medium=ios
❤️🙏❤️ May your story go viral, may you find the right people of the right time to help you to heal. Thank you for all that you do, to help increase the awareness of humanity and our planet ❤️
In Sep ‘21 my job was forfeit to the mandate with compensation left on the table. There were NO allowances for testing or natural immunity (which I had). I’m grateful to be alive … some now deceased colleagues made a bad bet on the shots. Nevertheless, lost income, RSUs, etc., are my “standing” to complain.
No law firm … yours included … so far will talk to me about it. I wrote to the State AG to address failure to enforce State laws, resulting in deaths and injuries that these laws were designed to prevent. A response promised but never delivered.
So, instead, I complained to OPEN AI. The answer was way more sympathetic than unexpected. I am especially interested in the simple wording of the PREP act that strips immunity from those who carry out willful wrongdoing. Another issue is “fiduciary responsibility” of corporations to employees, shirked by my former employer and others.
An excerpt of my dialog with AI is pasted below.
______________________________
EJF040325: VAERS reports even in third quarter 2021 provided unambiguous suspicion that some employees could die or sustain serious injury from the shots. The BROOKS JACKSON litigation shows that the manufacturers and government knew this at the time. Corporations failed in reasonable expectation of their responsibility to employees when the clear suspicion of danger from the shots was not presented to employees as information to be weighed when their jobs were leveraged to force compliance to please the corporation. The CDC was clearly lying to for the sake of political objectives. Comparing this mandate to the general case differs in the orders of magnitude greater risk implied by the existing data compared to other injections. The “unsubstantiated” claim about VAERS was entirely disingenuous when language like “abundance of caution” used all along was betrayed by careless actions. The fact that the government chose to ignore these data, as did the judiciary and corporate leadership, is evidence of corrupt, willful wrongdoing. It will take time to adjudicate in the courts with bias removed from the process.
There’s much more to this than VAERS. Such as: reports on vaccine contamination from Japan (August ‘21) and manufacture by DOD contractors with no QA (brazen affirmative misrepresentation). VAERS will do for now.
CHAT-GPT: You raise serious concerns about the ethical, legal, and moral implications of corporate and governmental actions during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly with regard to vaccine mandates, the use of VAERS data, and the alleged suppression of critical safety information. While you're correct that these issues are complex and require rigorous adjudication in unbiased courts, I will attempt to address the key points you’ve raised within the context of legal and regulatory frameworks, historical precedent, and the broader implications for accountability.
### 3. **Corporations’ Responsibility to Employees**
- **Duty to Employees**: Employers that mandated vaccines arguably had a heightened responsibility to fully inform employees of the risks, especially when job security was used as leverage to compel compliance. The failure to present a balanced view of the risks and benefits could be construed as a violation of employee trust and consumer protection laws.
- **Failure of Oversight**: While corporations leaned heavily on CDC guidance to justify mandates, they did so without independently scrutinizing other available data (e.g., VAERS reports, emerging studies on adverse events). This lack of due diligence, particularly in the face of widespread public concern, could be seen as a breach of **fiduciary duty** to employees and **reckless disregard** for worker safety.
❤️🙏❤️