21 Comments
User's avatar
Barb Reynolds's avatar

Thank you and the highwire for all you do.

Please donate to

https://icandecide.org/support-ican/

I am sharing the rumble link because it plays better for me

https://rumble.com/v2m8wk2-ican-attorney.html

LCLC's avatar

Let’s change the conversation. There is No need to question the safety or efficacy of unnecessary products that have zero benefit and only cause harm. Vaccines are a failed theory bay have never improved health for any individual or community in any situation ever in history. The immune system does not need or benefit from “training” by manmade toxic substances and in fact every so called outbreak throughout history has been caused by toxic exposure as to chemicals or technology.

Bob - Enough's avatar

The whole point of vaccines was for the Rockefellers to take over the medical industry.. thus they invented "viruses". Guess what the jabs caused ?... CANCERS... so they also set up the American Cancer Societies....

Good link by Rob (c137) below and to add to that is my favourite explanation and in general... taking 2 minutes of your time to understand (apologies if sent before).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WsqhwXfn2IU

KT-SunWillShineAgain's avatar

Thank you Aaron, I watched this twice, you make so much sense. The fact that big pharm has zero liability means they can sell vaccines with snake poison and not get sued no matter what. They earn billions of dollars for harmful products and the FDA/CDC is not regulating these products. Instead the FDA has become a promotional extension of big Pharm as you noted from looking at the FDA's website of happy families being shown after getting vaccinated.

Thanks for the intro to the Prep Act. Did you see the Dr. James Thorp's recently acquired FOIA'd 1,400+ page document that shows over 298 organisations/individuals received $13 billion? see his website, Totality of Evidence, https://totalityofevidence.com/dr-james-thorp/ .

aConcernedCitizen's avatar

Aaron, is there any route for suing the medical journals? For unjustly retracting some studies, or for retaining studies that have clear conflicts of interest, identifiable errors or fraud? They should be held to account if they are not publishing the robust science that most people believe they are.

Laurel's avatar

Aaron the event you have in AZ on thurs & fri is that open for the public to attend?

If so is there a schedule anywhere on who speaks on which days?

aConcernedCitizen's avatar

Thank you so much for this wonderful talk. Diagnose and understand the cause of the problem, then treat the underlying causes. What a fantastic methodology!

Transcriber B's avatar

I just finished watching the entire keynote. Best hour I spent in an age. Brilliant. Just brilliant. THANK YOU.

Rob's avatar

Thank you Aaron! Why is the changing of the definition of a vaccine recently not a lawsuit? Is the definition that was in the 1986 act not recognized as the legal framework which the government needs to change if they are adopting new definitions? And how is it that the gene therapy listed on Moderna's own filings not evidence to that contradiction? (David Martin)

Clark's avatar

They ignore it the same way they denied damage from all the other vaccines over the decades, going back to the Sabin oral live attenuated polio vaccine, which has been acknowledged in India to have caused 493,000 cases of so-called Acute Flaccid Non-Polio Paralysis between 2000 and 2017. How many cases in the United States did it cause until they stopped using it in the US in 2000. They couldn't admit it caused polio or polio-like symptoms, and doctors weren't looking for it, because polio had been eradicated. They just classified these various symptoms that they used to called forms of polio as chronic fatigue syndrome, Guilain Barre syndrome, dystonia, Tourette syndrome, fibromyalgia, myofascia, etc

Clark's avatar

They keep erasing erasing the history of it. About 12 years ago I read a newsletter (Dr. William Campbell Douglas?) that had data on how polio cases were declining in the US by the time the Salk vaccine came around. You cannot find that stuff with a Google or other search Engine now.

From the link you provided:

The polio vaccine did not ‘kill off’ polio. On the contrary, the vaccine resulted in more sufferers. In Tennessee, in the US, the number of polio victims before vaccination became compulsory was 119. The year after vaccination was introduced, the figure rose to 386. Similar figures for other American states. Polio became less common as a result of better sanitation and cleaner water supplies. The vaccination had no useful effect.

Sailon Waters's avatar

The whole virus trope is 100% a giant business plan. Those who understand the biome and correct eating plans never suffer ills or health issues. Don't be conned by disney myths, just eat well and those trillions of life forms in and on your body will thankyou.

Lynn Barton's avatar

Love this speech. Also happy and a bit amazed Dartmouth allowed it. My grandpa, father and a sibling attended Dartmouth. It's such a beautiful place. You are the BEST!

Lawyerlisa's avatar

Pfizer documents attached in substack 393 pages of adverse events

https://open.substack.com/pub/lawyerlisa/p/pfizer-data-attached-393-pages-of?r=3kbp6&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email Pfizer Appendix 2.2 Cumulative and Interval Summary Tabulation of Serious and Non-Serious Adverse Events from Post Marketing Data Sources BNT162-B2

User's avatar
Comment deleted
May 24, 2023
Comment deleted
Transcriber B's avatar

I say the same. Thank you, Aaron Siri, for posting this, it gives me a lot of heart. We citizens really need to not only understand this situation but what can be done to remedy it.