Excellent analysis and summary. The "bottom line" is simple to ascertain: More vaccinated people died than unvaccinated after receiving these shots. And once they "unblinded" the trials (basically did away with the placebo group), the disparity became even greater. Thanks. I'm going to share this via a cross-post on my Substack site.
The fix was in. It’s a DOD operation. That’s why the CDC & the FDA continue to ignore reality & allow catastrophic harm to the public. This is not a mistake or incompetence. It’s an orchestrated event & everyone should be terrified as to why and why they continue to ignore such obvious and unprecedented harm. They are killing children and they don’t care. They’re monsters!
What would be interesting data would be the ages of the cardiovascular deaths in both the placebo and vaccine subjects. Also the health and physical conditions of each patient that died.
This whole gene therapy rollout was too fast, sloppy and given the go by the agency we thought was there to protect us, the FDA.
What's crazy is that this has all been known for well over a year. The other garbage is that the trial "end point" was chosen as Covid cases vs. all cause death rate. The 95% efficacy was calculated on a RELATIVE RISK basis. The control group had 162 Covid cases vs. the trial group's 8 cases (8/162 = 5%... a 95% lower case rate). Everybody assumed that meant that the vaccine would protect you against 95% of the risk. Not.
The trial and control arms combined had 40,000 participants. The 162 control arm cases represented an ABSOLUTE RISK 0.4%. The trial arm 8 represented a 0.02% ABSOLUTE RISK. If the absolute risk reduction had been known by the general public to be so low, would they have run down to CVS to be jabbed? Especially after 1,223 people died from the jabs in the first 90 days of the roll out?
We already knew the 15 to 14 number, but the unblinded number just drives home the point that the clinical trial didn't support the need for these products. Absolutely criminal.
What were the reasons given by Pfizer and accepted by the FDA as to the cause of deaths among the spike protein injected? It seems illogical that “random health issues” could have been accepted as a cause of a statistical anomaly, so there must have been a better explanation. It’d be interesting to know what overwhelming convincing explanation was claimed.
What your article does not indicate is that standard statistical tests presumably showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the vaccine deaths and the placebo deaths. Meaning that there is a good chance that the disparity occurred by chance alone and not because the vaccines were more lethal. That is stat 101.
Do we know what was used as the placebo? Seems an extraordinary number of deaths for saline injection.
The FDA was only pretending to look at anything. It is all play-acting. The goal is to kill a bunch of us and get rich doing it.
Excellent analysis and summary. The "bottom line" is simple to ascertain: More vaccinated people died than unvaccinated after receiving these shots. And once they "unblinded" the trials (basically did away with the placebo group), the disparity became even greater. Thanks. I'm going to share this via a cross-post on my Substack site.
The fix was in. It’s a DOD operation. That’s why the CDC & the FDA continue to ignore reality & allow catastrophic harm to the public. This is not a mistake or incompetence. It’s an orchestrated event & everyone should be terrified as to why and why they continue to ignore such obvious and unprecedented harm. They are killing children and they don’t care. They’re monsters!
What would be interesting data would be the ages of the cardiovascular deaths in both the placebo and vaccine subjects. Also the health and physical conditions of each patient that died.
This whole gene therapy rollout was too fast, sloppy and given the go by the agency we thought was there to protect us, the FDA.
What's crazy is that this has all been known for well over a year. The other garbage is that the trial "end point" was chosen as Covid cases vs. all cause death rate. The 95% efficacy was calculated on a RELATIVE RISK basis. The control group had 162 Covid cases vs. the trial group's 8 cases (8/162 = 5%... a 95% lower case rate). Everybody assumed that meant that the vaccine would protect you against 95% of the risk. Not.
The trial and control arms combined had 40,000 participants. The 162 control arm cases represented an ABSOLUTE RISK 0.4%. The trial arm 8 represented a 0.02% ABSOLUTE RISK. If the absolute risk reduction had been known by the general public to be so low, would they have run down to CVS to be jabbed? Especially after 1,223 people died from the jabs in the first 90 days of the roll out?
Thank you so much for the work you are doing for all of us!!!
Those FDA and other Government officials think they’re getting away with Murder. They’re right, they are, for now.
But the Bible reminds us our lives are but a vapor (James 4:14). They’re facing the Righteous Judge sooner than they realize, though.
We already knew the 15 to 14 number, but the unblinded number just drives home the point that the clinical trial didn't support the need for these products. Absolutely criminal.
What were the reasons given by Pfizer and accepted by the FDA as to the cause of deaths among the spike protein injected? It seems illogical that “random health issues” could have been accepted as a cause of a statistical anomaly, so there must have been a better explanation. It’d be interesting to know what overwhelming convincing explanation was claimed.
Aaron, thanks for the shout-out but I was just cross-posting from Ben from usmortality.substack.com
What your article does not indicate is that standard statistical tests presumably showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the vaccine deaths and the placebo deaths. Meaning that there is a good chance that the disparity occurred by chance alone and not because the vaccines were more lethal. That is stat 101.
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/this-family-is-fighting-back
Great article Bill! I keep spreading your word!
funny how they think we don’t know. truth is, we are just not talking enough!
Who can even trust them to do a clinical trial?
Fauci -'Take this injection'
You -'What does it do?'
Fauci -'Increases your chances of death'
You-'That sounds like a bad idea'.
Fauci 'I am science, now take the f##king shot before I get you fired'.