Opening line of reply, "The Government envisions a world in which an omnipotent federal overlord has the power and authority to regulate the smallest details of everyday American life..."
What about the Comirnaty bait and switch? They are trying to illegally mandate an EUA product that they’ve intentionally mischaracterized as fully approved.
They did address that simply by saying the shots come with no liability for the manufacturer. The actual Comirnaty shot would have liability, that's why they're not dispensing it and still using the EUA product.
Not quite. If the vaccines are mandated for children to go to school, then pharma would still find themselves absolved of liability. I should also point out that there have never been vaccine mandates in democratic nations. The "mandates" from past inoculation programs, cannot be defined as such, since they all have exemptions people can rely on. However, it seems that those exemptions are now being ignored. Here in Canada, they won't even give an exemption to people who were injured by their first dose.
Additionally, I believe the situation warrants far more than a passing acknowledgment addressing the topic of liability. They are knowingly distributing a product which causes bodily harm, for a virus that does not exist. Liability claims are addressed in a civil courts, but really what we have is premediated murder and collusion which should be taken up in criminal courts.
I think you are right but I've read that if they mandate the use of comirnaty for 16 years and up then if falls under the "childhood" mandate and therefore there is no liability as per the 1986 act. Please let me know if I did or didn't get this right. Thanks
If you go to the CDC website they deny up down and sideways that there is any difference between the two. Meanwhile the judge in the ongoing Department of Defense case has ruled that they are legally distinct.
Do you happen to have a link that explains this bait and switch scam? People in my country keep calling it Comirnaty and I've heard that Comirnaty isn't administered anywhere.
I believe even if they were dispensing it, there would be no liability because of the indemnification for vaccines. In my opinion, just another scam to trick people that don’t follow things closely into believing it’s FDA approved, which the shots being dispensed now are not.
RFK Jr says, this is one reason they are pushing it so hard for the kids- if they get a full approval for kids in any age group, the 1986 act will apply.
I would put the odds at 99% that the gov never releases an obsolete, worthless jab. EUA forever is their model. No government nor manufacturer liability subject to judicial review. Screwing Americans one mandated money making jab at a time.
Which is exactly why they’re so desperate to get this on the childhood vaccine schedule. Wouldn’t surprise me in the least if they were pressuring school boards and Democrat governors to mandate this for school attendance in exchange for hefty donations.
Excellent. In watching every FDA meeting I’ve been disturbed at the words being used such as we speculate. My motto this week is if you speculate you can’t mandate. They clearly say this many times. Also it took 6 months for the recognition that a safety signal popped up about myocarditis/pericarditis. They’ve now approved boosters for children saying that the second shot is where the myocarditis seems to be the worst and the third shot has a lower risk of myocarditis. Janet Woodcock and Peter Marks had a you tube video in the last few days put out explaining why they didn’t go through the normal procedure of having the VRPAC analyze the data which breaks with the norms. How can the risks outweigh the benefits when they freely admit to speculation with very limited data to share? The let’s vaccinate and then we’ll watch for safety signals is unacceptable. If it’s you or your child injured it becomes a very big deal even though they don’t see it that way. They frequently refer to the Israeli data when it fits the narrative then pivot and don’t mention it in the next sentence out of their mouths when they didn’t mention that the Israelis are or about to start the 4 th booster. If the vaccine protects then why the need for continued boosters? This accumulation of whatever is in the vaccines has had no long term studies. Also Moderna has stated their vaccine is a gene based therapy and with that comes certain rules like a 5-10 year follow up on the risk for certain cancers. If those in charge of our health can freely use the words they speculate I don’t believe that can lead to mandate. The Sept meeting has over 1.4 million views . These are generally 8 hour meetings and often times tedious and boring but if you watch them you’ll be horrified in some of the things they state. When they won’t even recognize natural or acquired immunity even though studies show it exists then they’ve lied to the public. They reference a study done in Kentucky and leave out the Israeli study that shows people with immunity from prior infection shows up to 27 times greater protection . Basically they cherry pick a study from anywhere that fits their narrative while never mentioning any other credible study. The whole thing stinks of corruption and that while being unsure of protection provided and safety signals yet to be seen the fact they are mandating something to be put in our bodies that can’t be reversed speculation is certainly not reassuring.
I would recommend watching the latest 30 minute video if short on time and if you can watch a few of the 8 hour meetings in which they did vote and the CDC basically overruled them and listen to the questions the voting members had. Highly disturbing . If people heard these they may not be so willing to take an experimental injection. Maybe the vaccine makers need to go back to the drawing board per se and just admit this didn’t work as they thought it would.
Then you have CNN and Sanjay Gupta appearing with Big Bird encouraging children to get a vaccine that they certainly can’t give informed consent for . It seems that is breaking the law because advertising is not allowed of an EUA product let alone taking advantage of children. It’s truly sad in every aspect and dishonest to the public. Ethics seem to be lacking as well as data. It seems the administration has decided to disregard any standards , deviate from the norms and pressure the FDA and when they don’t agree have Rochelle Wolensky step in and call the shots herself. Seems we’ve thrown out any sensibility in this pandemic by censorship and the failure of transparency along with the mainstream media pandering fear porn into the nation.
Thank you for standing up to this bullying without any reason or supportive data to back it up from the CDC . Also Dr. John Su’s presentation is filled with errors . If you tease that out it is apparent the stats he provides are not statistically possible.
Long rant but I sure do appreciate and respect all your hard work in fighting for our freedoms.
Pfizer has had their offices literally a mile up the road (on Shady Grove Rd) from the FDA offices in Rockville MD since 2017. This is not coincidence. It’s design.
Ive watched all the hearings as well. Dr Marks is a liar. He claimed during one of the hearings that the injuries were all lies. Really? Unbelievable. I just can't believe they are giving these shots to the 5 to 11 year olds. Something more needs to be done to stop these shots!!!! Now.
I’ve seen many MDs on Medscape comment threads also claim that VAERS is “meaningless” and “anti vaxxers make up injuries” etc. They seem to forget that THEY designed VAERS themselves, as a passive system. Most doctors don’t even know what VAERS is. That’s what’s really shocking. FDA is totally corrupted, and has been for years, even decades.
“‘Our nation asks the men and women in our military to serve, suffer, and sacrifice. But we do not ask them to lay aside their citizenry and give up the very rights they have sworn to protect.’
“And so the United States District Court, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division has ruled in the case of US Navy Seals vs Joseph R. Biden.”
——
On another note, I am hoping your audience will join me in recommending Dr. Robert Malone as the next Substack writer-in-residence via this form:
I wrote the following note to my support guy this morning and encourage everyone to add their voices so we create a groundswell they won’t be able to ignore:
Email text below:
[Something] just came up in the comments at another Substacker's post, and I am hoping you can help me get this request to the right person.
Appointing a BigPharma propagandist like Eric Topol as writer-in-residence sent up HUGE red flags for a lot of Substackers who are fighting to present peer-reviewed science, expose MSM disinformation campaigns, and fight the increasingly totalitarian measures being implemented around the world. When Substack made that announcement, *thousands* of people registered their complaints in the comments, but the comments were then turned off and those voices censored. Topol did not permit comments on future posts and refused to debate any issues when challenged by credible scientists. This was a huge blow to the credibility of Substack and its commitment to free speech.
To restore some of that credibility and prove its dedication to free speech and open debate, I highly and emphatically recommend Substack appoint Dr. Robert Malone as its writer-in-residence ASAP. It would be a win-win from every conceivable angle. Substack would be restoring some degree of its tarnished reputation while simultaneously riding the tidal wave of traffic flowing in following Dr. Malone's titanic Joe Rogan appearance, which reached 50 million viewers and has been bringing in a flood of new readers. This, combined with a large portion of the half a million Twitter users who came to Substack after Dr. Malone was cancelled means he has been responsible for bringing potentially millions of new users to your platform. Appointing him writer-in-residence not only demonstrates Substack's integrity but also would encourage even more readers to join Substack as his popularity continues to skyrocket.
The tides are turning toward truth as the BigPharma-funded narrative is disintegrating daily, so Substack would be wise to plant its flag on Team Truth/Reality/Freedom before the full range of MSM-propagated lies and the psychopathic criminality of its BigPharma puppeteers become evident to the public, which is imminent in the wake of the one-two punch of Dr. Peter McCullough + Dr. Malone on Joe Rogan combined with RFK Jr.'s #1 bestselling The Real Anthony Fauci (which I highly recommend you read if you aren't already aware of the four decades' worth of irrefutably documented corruption; torture and murder of both orphans and beagles in agonizing medical experiments; and cataclysmic conflicts of interest caused by regulatory capture).
All that to say this is the moment for Substack to stand up for freedom, truth, and humanity, and I can think of no better person to signal that stance than Dr. Robert Malone (who will be the next subject featured in my new Profiles in Courage series, BTW).
Thank you for bearing with my diatribe, and I eagerly await a response regarding this request.
——
I heard back from my support guy right away:
“Your feedback is very much appreciated! We're grateful you care enough to write to us with this request. I've passed this along to our community team.”
There are NO approved COVID 19 vaccines on the USA market. PERIOD. No entity can mandate experimental treatments as a condition for anything. PERIOD. Title 21 U.S.C., the Nuremberg Code, the Geneva Convention etc.
Absolutely! You need to know how to approach the issue. For example, masks, of any kind, are under EUA by FDA since April 2020. It is illegal to mandate any experimental medical device. Sue the city council, the county, the school district, or write them a letter to complain against the illegality. Write to your Representatives, write to your Governor. Stand up for your family, for your community. Otherwise, they will become worse than Nazis! Your freedoms are guaranteed by the state, they are not given to you by the state. Do NOT forget that all these bureaucrats are there to represent the WILL of the people. And WE are the people.
Jenya, look in your state statutes to see if there is any statute about informed consent with regard to clinical trials. That would be one basis to protest this requirement. To the extent they are basing any mandate on a federal executive order or ETS, you may use the following ideas which I use in client submissions when seeking to be excused from the mandates:
While mandating approved vaccines is at best questionable, vaccines, under an emergency use authorization, can certainly not be mandated, as it is contrary to federal law. This is because:
“…[F]ederal law prohibits any mandate of the Covid-19 vaccines as unlicensed, emergency-use-authorization-only vaccines. Subsection bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III) of section 360 of Title 21 of the United States Code, otherwise known as the Emergency Use Authorization section of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, demands that everyone give employees the "option to accept or refuse administration" of the Covid-19 vaccine. (See ...u/uscode/text/21/360bbb-3" target="_blank" class="link" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/360bbb-3)
According to Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Esq., this law also requires any recipient of an experimental vaccine to be made aware, “of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.” He went on to state that:
[e]ven if the FDA approves and licenses existing COVID vaccines, they will remain experimental and thus subject to the international requirement that informed consent is “absolutely essential.” See Nuremberg Code, Article 1; Abdullahi v Pfizer, Inc., 562 F3d 163 [2d Cir 2009]. Phase III clinical trials for the Pfizer vaccine do not end until May 2, 2021; and for the Moderna vaccine until October 27, 2022.
EUA products are by definition experimental and thus require the right to refuse. Under the Nuremberg Code, the foundation of ethical medicine, no one may be coerced to participate in a medical experiment. Consent of the individual is “absolutely essential.” A federal court held that the U.S. military could not mandate EUA vaccines to soldiers. Doe #1 v. Rumsfeld, 297 F.Supp.2d 119 (2003). The court held: "...the United States cannot demand that members of the armed forces also serve as guinea pigs for experimental drugs." Id. at 135. No court has upheld a mandate for an EUA vaccine. See Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Esq., “NOTICE FOR EMPLOYERS, UNIVERSITIES AND OTHER INSTITUTIONS MANDATING COVID-19 VACCINES”, Children’s Health Defense, August 31, 2021, https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/notice-for-employers-universities-and-other-institutions-mandating-covid-19-vaccines8.31.21.pdf
Also note that the # of deaths divided by total deaths has progressively dropped since early on in the "pandemic" despite the rise in the spectres of delta and omicron. Currently we are at a rate of about 1.5 percent. I also believe that the definition of "pandemic" was changed early on in this outbreak in order to justify categorizing it as a "pandemic."
It'd be useful, by way of contrast, to have similar figures for an actual pandemic. You'd think there's definitive criteria somewhere?
Early 2020 it was a significant announcement (from the WHO/media) when they upgraded SARS-CoV-2 to pandemic status? What's the basis? # of countries? Projected infections? Projected deaths?
Aaron, the way you articulate facts so calmly in the face of these unethical people is inspiring. They wouldn’t be pushing so hard if we didn’t have what they want, which is power!! Thank you again for all you do!!
😭😭 I'm crying, because that is so beautifully worded and written. Makes me wish I had become a lawyer, so I could be "all up in their grill," too. I can't say thank-you enough!
Thank you very much. As someone who will be impacted by the court's decision I am grateful for your efforts. Including the vaccine's lack of efficacy is reducing transmission is a major point that you included. Thank you for your efforts to protect our constitutional rights. As far as I'm concerned you are Hero.
The first is right in the document. The apostrophe is always after the s when the word is plural but whose is correct not who’s - who is would make no sense
Thank you for this Mr. Siri! I have sent a copy to my brother in ONTARIO, who has to daily do rapid antigen tests, while all "vaccinated" at his workplace do not - it's discriminatory and unscientific. Thank you for the battle you are fighting for so many. We are making progress against the violations of the Charter with vaccine mandates here in Canada, but painfully slowly.
What about the Comirnaty bait and switch? They are trying to illegally mandate an EUA product that they’ve intentionally mischaracterized as fully approved.
They did address that simply by saying the shots come with no liability for the manufacturer. The actual Comirnaty shot would have liability, that's why they're not dispensing it and still using the EUA product.
Not quite. If the vaccines are mandated for children to go to school, then pharma would still find themselves absolved of liability. I should also point out that there have never been vaccine mandates in democratic nations. The "mandates" from past inoculation programs, cannot be defined as such, since they all have exemptions people can rely on. However, it seems that those exemptions are now being ignored. Here in Canada, they won't even give an exemption to people who were injured by their first dose.
Additionally, I believe the situation warrants far more than a passing acknowledgment addressing the topic of liability. They are knowingly distributing a product which causes bodily harm, for a virus that does not exist. Liability claims are addressed in a civil courts, but really what we have is premediated murder and collusion which should be taken up in criminal courts.
I think you are right but I've read that if they mandate the use of comirnaty for 16 years and up then if falls under the "childhood" mandate and therefore there is no liability as per the 1986 act. Please let me know if I did or didn't get this right. Thanks
If you go to the CDC website they deny up down and sideways that there is any difference between the two. Meanwhile the judge in the ongoing Department of Defense case has ruled that they are legally distinct.
True. The FDA actually maintains that the two are legally distinct, which likely informed the judge’s ruling.
https://youtu.be/NLC97MKw1ck
Do you happen to have a link that explains this bait and switch scam? People in my country keep calling it Comirnaty and I've heard that Comirnaty isn't administered anywhere.
Here's the link for an excellent explanation:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/steve-kirsch-alix-mayer-pfizer-approved-comirnaty-vaccine/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=81441069-1016-492c-b9dd-c4a284633b08&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=9816e0c4-3365-4e2b-9a69-073821851868
Thank you very much! I should've known to search in Steve Kirsch's articles, he is so active!
I believe even if they were dispensing it, there would be no liability because of the indemnification for vaccines. In my opinion, just another scam to trick people that don’t follow things closely into believing it’s FDA approved, which the shots being dispensed now are not.
RFK Jr says, this is one reason they are pushing it so hard for the kids- if they get a full approval for kids in any age group, the 1986 act will apply.
I would put the odds at 99% that the gov never releases an obsolete, worthless jab. EUA forever is their model. No government nor manufacturer liability subject to judicial review. Screwing Americans one mandated money making jab at a time.
The whole planet, actually, via specific contracts with governments.
Exactly right. The insidious actions are absolutely unconscionable.
None of this applies unless the drug or vaccine is FDA approved, under an EUA, this is a moot point.
Per the 1986 Act, only childhood immunizations have no liability from the manufacturer.
Which is exactly why they’re so desperate to get this on the childhood vaccine schedule. Wouldn’t surprise me in the least if they were pressuring school boards and Democrat governors to mandate this for school attendance in exchange for hefty donations.
And the PREP act of 2005. Big Pharma answers to no one.
Excellent. In watching every FDA meeting I’ve been disturbed at the words being used such as we speculate. My motto this week is if you speculate you can’t mandate. They clearly say this many times. Also it took 6 months for the recognition that a safety signal popped up about myocarditis/pericarditis. They’ve now approved boosters for children saying that the second shot is where the myocarditis seems to be the worst and the third shot has a lower risk of myocarditis. Janet Woodcock and Peter Marks had a you tube video in the last few days put out explaining why they didn’t go through the normal procedure of having the VRPAC analyze the data which breaks with the norms. How can the risks outweigh the benefits when they freely admit to speculation with very limited data to share? The let’s vaccinate and then we’ll watch for safety signals is unacceptable. If it’s you or your child injured it becomes a very big deal even though they don’t see it that way. They frequently refer to the Israeli data when it fits the narrative then pivot and don’t mention it in the next sentence out of their mouths when they didn’t mention that the Israelis are or about to start the 4 th booster. If the vaccine protects then why the need for continued boosters? This accumulation of whatever is in the vaccines has had no long term studies. Also Moderna has stated their vaccine is a gene based therapy and with that comes certain rules like a 5-10 year follow up on the risk for certain cancers. If those in charge of our health can freely use the words they speculate I don’t believe that can lead to mandate. The Sept meeting has over 1.4 million views . These are generally 8 hour meetings and often times tedious and boring but if you watch them you’ll be horrified in some of the things they state. When they won’t even recognize natural or acquired immunity even though studies show it exists then they’ve lied to the public. They reference a study done in Kentucky and leave out the Israeli study that shows people with immunity from prior infection shows up to 27 times greater protection . Basically they cherry pick a study from anywhere that fits their narrative while never mentioning any other credible study. The whole thing stinks of corruption and that while being unsure of protection provided and safety signals yet to be seen the fact they are mandating something to be put in our bodies that can’t be reversed speculation is certainly not reassuring.
I would recommend watching the latest 30 minute video if short on time and if you can watch a few of the 8 hour meetings in which they did vote and the CDC basically overruled them and listen to the questions the voting members had. Highly disturbing . If people heard these they may not be so willing to take an experimental injection. Maybe the vaccine makers need to go back to the drawing board per se and just admit this didn’t work as they thought it would.
Then you have CNN and Sanjay Gupta appearing with Big Bird encouraging children to get a vaccine that they certainly can’t give informed consent for . It seems that is breaking the law because advertising is not allowed of an EUA product let alone taking advantage of children. It’s truly sad in every aspect and dishonest to the public. Ethics seem to be lacking as well as data. It seems the administration has decided to disregard any standards , deviate from the norms and pressure the FDA and when they don’t agree have Rochelle Wolensky step in and call the shots herself. Seems we’ve thrown out any sensibility in this pandemic by censorship and the failure of transparency along with the mainstream media pandering fear porn into the nation.
Thank you for standing up to this bullying without any reason or supportive data to back it up from the CDC . Also Dr. John Su’s presentation is filled with errors . If you tease that out it is apparent the stats he provides are not statistically possible.
Long rant but I sure do appreciate and respect all your hard work in fighting for our freedoms.
Pfizer has had their offices literally a mile up the road (on Shady Grove Rd) from the FDA offices in Rockville MD since 2017. This is not coincidence. It’s design.
Humorous take on how captured agencies operate “safely.” https://youtu.be/Czu11HmhfAY
Thank God for JP Sears bringing us humor when things have been so dark!
Great insights
Ive watched all the hearings as well. Dr Marks is a liar. He claimed during one of the hearings that the injuries were all lies. Really? Unbelievable. I just can't believe they are giving these shots to the 5 to 11 year olds. Something more needs to be done to stop these shots!!!! Now.
I’ve seen many MDs on Medscape comment threads also claim that VAERS is “meaningless” and “anti vaxxers make up injuries” etc. They seem to forget that THEY designed VAERS themselves, as a passive system. Most doctors don’t even know what VAERS is. That’s what’s really shocking. FDA is totally corrupted, and has been for years, even decades.
If the Supreme Court doesn't strike down this illegal regulation they will basically plunge the country into a crisis.
Choose wisely, Justices.
👏🙏🙌
Aaron, I’m sure you already know this, but I wanted to alert your audience to this exciting victory Dr. Malone shared this morning:
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/serve-suffer-and-sacrifice
“‘Our nation asks the men and women in our military to serve, suffer, and sacrifice. But we do not ask them to lay aside their citizenry and give up the very rights they have sworn to protect.’
“And so the United States District Court, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division has ruled in the case of US Navy Seals vs Joseph R. Biden.”
——
On another note, I am hoping your audience will join me in recommending Dr. Robert Malone as the next Substack writer-in-residence via this form:
https://support.substack.com/hc/en-us/requests/new
I wrote the following note to my support guy this morning and encourage everyone to add their voices so we create a groundswell they won’t be able to ignore:
Email text below:
[Something] just came up in the comments at another Substacker's post, and I am hoping you can help me get this request to the right person.
Appointing a BigPharma propagandist like Eric Topol as writer-in-residence sent up HUGE red flags for a lot of Substackers who are fighting to present peer-reviewed science, expose MSM disinformation campaigns, and fight the increasingly totalitarian measures being implemented around the world. When Substack made that announcement, *thousands* of people registered their complaints in the comments, but the comments were then turned off and those voices censored. Topol did not permit comments on future posts and refused to debate any issues when challenged by credible scientists. This was a huge blow to the credibility of Substack and its commitment to free speech.
To restore some of that credibility and prove its dedication to free speech and open debate, I highly and emphatically recommend Substack appoint Dr. Robert Malone as its writer-in-residence ASAP. It would be a win-win from every conceivable angle. Substack would be restoring some degree of its tarnished reputation while simultaneously riding the tidal wave of traffic flowing in following Dr. Malone's titanic Joe Rogan appearance, which reached 50 million viewers and has been bringing in a flood of new readers. This, combined with a large portion of the half a million Twitter users who came to Substack after Dr. Malone was cancelled means he has been responsible for bringing potentially millions of new users to your platform. Appointing him writer-in-residence not only demonstrates Substack's integrity but also would encourage even more readers to join Substack as his popularity continues to skyrocket.
The tides are turning toward truth as the BigPharma-funded narrative is disintegrating daily, so Substack would be wise to plant its flag on Team Truth/Reality/Freedom before the full range of MSM-propagated lies and the psychopathic criminality of its BigPharma puppeteers become evident to the public, which is imminent in the wake of the one-two punch of Dr. Peter McCullough + Dr. Malone on Joe Rogan combined with RFK Jr.'s #1 bestselling The Real Anthony Fauci (which I highly recommend you read if you aren't already aware of the four decades' worth of irrefutably documented corruption; torture and murder of both orphans and beagles in agonizing medical experiments; and cataclysmic conflicts of interest caused by regulatory capture).
All that to say this is the moment for Substack to stand up for freedom, truth, and humanity, and I can think of no better person to signal that stance than Dr. Robert Malone (who will be the next subject featured in my new Profiles in Courage series, BTW).
Thank you for bearing with my diatribe, and I eagerly await a response regarding this request.
——
I heard back from my support guy right away:
“Your feedback is very much appreciated! We're grateful you care enough to write to us with this request. I've passed this along to our community team.”
Do we have a clue to the number of Topol subscribers? I won't subscribe.
No, it’s extremely opaque. Just another one-way propaganda machine.
So we all need to "start a Substack"..? I'm seconding this advice. Fortunately it's very easy, 5-10 minutes max.
Thanks, Unicorn! I’ve got one :-) https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/
I get the roll call invites but am not always available as my sleep schedule fluctuates wildly on a daily basis.
Oh, they’re not like the one-hour Shoutout sessions and stay open? I didn’t realize that. Thanks!
There are NO approved COVID 19 vaccines on the USA market. PERIOD. No entity can mandate experimental treatments as a condition for anything. PERIOD. Title 21 U.S.C., the Nuremberg Code, the Geneva Convention etc.
So would that also overturn state, city and employer mandates?
Absolutely! You need to know how to approach the issue. For example, masks, of any kind, are under EUA by FDA since April 2020. It is illegal to mandate any experimental medical device. Sue the city council, the county, the school district, or write them a letter to complain against the illegality. Write to your Representatives, write to your Governor. Stand up for your family, for your community. Otherwise, they will become worse than Nazis! Your freedoms are guaranteed by the state, they are not given to you by the state. Do NOT forget that all these bureaucrats are there to represent the WILL of the people. And WE are the people.
Amen! Excellently stated.
That would be an uphill battle here in NYC
Use the FDA letter from April 2020, take it from local authorities and go up to the state. We absolutely need to not give up!
But doable, nonetheless. Do NOT become resigned. That's what those in power are counting on.
Jenya, look in your state statutes to see if there is any statute about informed consent with regard to clinical trials. That would be one basis to protest this requirement. To the extent they are basing any mandate on a federal executive order or ETS, you may use the following ideas which I use in client submissions when seeking to be excused from the mandates:
While mandating approved vaccines is at best questionable, vaccines, under an emergency use authorization, can certainly not be mandated, as it is contrary to federal law. This is because:
“…[F]ederal law prohibits any mandate of the Covid-19 vaccines as unlicensed, emergency-use-authorization-only vaccines. Subsection bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III) of section 360 of Title 21 of the United States Code, otherwise known as the Emergency Use Authorization section of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, demands that everyone give employees the "option to accept or refuse administration" of the Covid-19 vaccine. (See ...u/uscode/text/21/360bbb-3" target="_blank" class="link" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/360bbb-3)
According to Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Esq., this law also requires any recipient of an experimental vaccine to be made aware, “of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.” He went on to state that:
[e]ven if the FDA approves and licenses existing COVID vaccines, they will remain experimental and thus subject to the international requirement that informed consent is “absolutely essential.” See Nuremberg Code, Article 1; Abdullahi v Pfizer, Inc., 562 F3d 163 [2d Cir 2009]. Phase III clinical trials for the Pfizer vaccine do not end until May 2, 2021; and for the Moderna vaccine until October 27, 2022.
EUA products are by definition experimental and thus require the right to refuse. Under the Nuremberg Code, the foundation of ethical medicine, no one may be coerced to participate in a medical experiment. Consent of the individual is “absolutely essential.” A federal court held that the U.S. military could not mandate EUA vaccines to soldiers. Doe #1 v. Rumsfeld, 297 F.Supp.2d 119 (2003). The court held: "...the United States cannot demand that members of the armed forces also serve as guinea pigs for experimental drugs." Id. at 135. No court has upheld a mandate for an EUA vaccine. See Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Esq., “NOTICE FOR EMPLOYERS, UNIVERSITIES AND OTHER INSTITUTIONS MANDATING COVID-19 VACCINES”, Children’s Health Defense, August 31, 2021, https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/notice-for-employers-universities-and-other-institutions-mandating-covid-19-vaccines8.31.21.pdf
Small correction: Pfizer's trial completion date is actually May 15, 2023
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04368728
Thank you!
It certainly should. This kind of analysis is what has been missing and needs to be emphasized.
Amen.
Right
Shouldn't they have to at least prove there was a pandemic?
Can you spot the year of the "pandemic?"
2010: world population - 6,843,522,711; world deaths - 54,500,000; percentage of deaths per population - .796%
2011: world population - 7,041,194,301; world deaths - 54,640,000; percentage of deaths per population - .776%
2012: world population - 7,125,828,059; world deaths - 54,840,000; percentage of deaths per population - .769%
2013: world population - 7,210,581,976; world deaths - 55,090,000; percentage of deaths per population - .764%
2014: world population - 7,295,290,765; world deaths - 55,410,000; percentage of deaths per population - .759%
2015: world population - 7,379,797,139; world deaths - 55,822,989; percentage of deaths per population - .756%
2016: world population - 7,464,022,049; world deaths - 56,331,837; percentage of deaths
per population - .754%
2017: world population - 7,547,858,925; world deaths - 56,935,173; percentage of deaths per population - .754%
2018: world population - 7,631,091,040; world deaths - 57,625,149; percentage of deaths per population - .755%
2019: world population - 7,713,468,100; world deaths - 58,394,378; percentage of deaths per population - .757%
2020: world population - 7,794,798,739; world deaths - 59,230,795; percentage of deaths per population - .759%
Exactly correct. There was no pandemic. More proof:
https://pdmj.org/papers/is_there_a_pandemic
Also note that the # of deaths divided by total deaths has progressively dropped since early on in the "pandemic" despite the rise in the spectres of delta and omicron. Currently we are at a rate of about 1.5 percent. I also believe that the definition of "pandemic" was changed early on in this outbreak in order to justify categorizing it as a "pandemic."
Great paper.
Thank you.
Excellent resource! Thank you!
It'd be useful, by way of contrast, to have similar figures for an actual pandemic. You'd think there's definitive criteria somewhere?
Early 2020 it was a significant announcement (from the WHO/media) when they upgraded SARS-CoV-2 to pandemic status? What's the basis? # of countries? Projected infections? Projected deaths?
Thank you so much for the essential work you and your team are doing on this Aaron!
Aaron, the way you articulate facts so calmly in the face of these unethical people is inspiring. They wouldn’t be pushing so hard if we didn’t have what they want, which is power!! Thank you again for all you do!!
Indeed. Grace under pressure.
This is excellent! If the Supremes are still free of pharma influence there is hope. Big if.
I have my doubts about Roberts, Kavanaugh and ACB. Thomas, Alito and Gotsuch will surely do the right thing.
We don’t have to hold our breath for long….
😭😭 I'm crying, because that is so beautifully worded and written. Makes me wish I had become a lawyer, so I could be "all up in their grill," too. I can't say thank-you enough!
WOW!! Thank you SO much for ALL of your hard work and for sharing this information with us!! I appreciate you!!
Thank you very much. As someone who will be impacted by the court's decision I am grateful for your efforts. Including the vaccine's lack of efficacy is reducing transmission is a major point that you included. Thank you for your efforts to protect our constitutional rights. As far as I'm concerned you are Hero.
Brilliant! Thank you enormously for making irrefutable arguments. I am so grateful for your work.
Two nitpicky suggested edits:
Paragraph 2: Americans' diets, (apostrophe placement), and
several paragraphs down: whose manufacturer (not who's).
The first is right in the document. The apostrophe is always after the s when the word is plural but whose is correct not who’s - who is would make no sense
Thank you for this Mr. Siri! I have sent a copy to my brother in ONTARIO, who has to daily do rapid antigen tests, while all "vaccinated" at his workplace do not - it's discriminatory and unscientific. Thank you for the battle you are fighting for so many. We are making progress against the violations of the Charter with vaccine mandates here in Canada, but painfully slowly.
This was Rockefeller’s wet dream. Corporate communism. Corporations running the world.
Great arguments. For the sake of our health, ability to function in society and be gainfully employed, I hope you prevail.