These studies also demonstrate why it makes no sense that employers mandate testing in the unvaccinated but do not require the vaccinated to test. The vaccinated could be spreading infection without knowing it. By only testing the unvaccinated, you are creating a biased sample that perpetuates the myth of "pandemic of the unvaccinated". BIAS.
Luckily, there are at least a few of us who actually understand what is happening and we will not comply. Despite the desires of the corporate/government elite, there is a control group in this experiment. Jab or job? Fine, fire me. It may take awhile, but the truth will set us free.
Another great article Aaron. You are being tactful when you said the CDC made a mistake. The CDC and FDA know exactly what they're doing. The shots were never about saving lives. The FDA receives 45% of its revenues from industry user fees, so they rely on funding from the industry they regulate. They can't make much on repurposing generic drugs. That's why they obstruct access to HCQ and Ivermectin and push the jabs. The CDC receives millions in donations from the Gates Foundation, which is the second largest donor to the WHO. Fauci has been on the Gates Foundation's Global Vaccine Action Plan's Leadership Council since 2010. Gates became a strategic collaborator with Moderna in January 2016, injecting millions to study infectious diseases.
Fauci/NIAID's scientists collaborated with Moderna to create their jab, and funded their clinical trials, which began March 16, 2020. Government scientists receive millions in personal royalties on gov't funded treatments (i.e. taxpayer $) and it's all perfectly legal. It's one big incestuous cesspool of corruption.
And most people don't even know that the jabs don't reduce the risk of infection. The "95% efficacy" is the 'relative' risk reduction measure, which is the % reduction in infection risk between the placebo group and the vaxxed group, which was .0761% and .044%, respectively, in Pfizer's clinical trial. So it is about a 95% reduction from .761% to .044%. But the risk of infection for BOTH groups was < 1%. The vaccine 'effectiveness' is the 'absolute' risk reduction measure (ARR), which is .761% - .044%, or .7%. So Pfizer's jab reduces the risk of infection by .7%. In fact, the ARR for ALL the Covid shots is < 2%, which the vaccine manufacturers and the FDA did not disclose to the public, ignoring the FDA's own reporting guidelines. A study published in The Lancet confirms all the Covid19 vaccines' ARR is <2%.
Pfizer .9%
Moderna 1.4%
J&J 1.8%
AstraZeneca-Oxford 1.9%
Gamaleya (Sputnik V) 1%
"Covid-19 vaccine efficacy and effectiveness - the elephant (not) in the room"
I guess I’m among those who believed from the beginning that mandating an experimental vaccine as happened was never primarily a public health concern but rather an act of arbitrary power.
This is just devastating that we are being forced to take these risks with our bodies for no benefit. I am looking for legal help for my son. He is at University of Kansas Medical Center, he is a medical student. They are basically forcing and coercing him into getting this. This is completely against his religion/philosophical views. He is extremely health conscious. He has a genetic situation which makes him more susceptible to cancer and now they are seeing signals for cancer with this jab. His father died of cancer and many many of his family members have died of cancer. The students were told the University was not legally aloud to ask their vaccination status, but now they are asking and saying they have until October 1st to turn in their vaccination status. It says on the Med Centers website they are not taking Religious exemptions. How can the med center just say they are not taking religious exemptions??
I'm planning to send in my religious exemption request to my employer shortly before their deadline on Dec 15th. I'm tempted to send them these studies but I don't want to appear antagonistic since I'm hoping to keep my job. In my employer's new mandate policy, a Covid-19 vaccine is defined as "a vaccine that effective at both preventing the transmission of the virus that causes Covid-19 and preventing serious illness or death caused by the virus..." I want to ask them where they got the definition of the vaccine. The CDC website states the vaccine may reduce transmission but does not state it can "prevent" transmission. The whole thing is so ridiculous!
“…concluded that an N1 Ct value over 24 should not be taken to indicate the presence of any actual virus”
Oh really? So are we finally admitting that all those ‘positive’ results from when we were cranking the test all the way up to 40 cycles were meaningless?
Thank you for the information. As a scientist I find the data very interesting and all pointing to the same conclusion. You should never try to vaccinate your way out of pandemic while in a pandemic. Several evolutionary biologists and epidemiologists that said the same thing were all cast to the side.
"The lesson is that civil and individual rights should never be contingent upon a medical procedure. Everyone that wants to get vaccinated and boosted is free to do so. But nobody should be coerced to partake in any medical procedure."
That is the bottom line. Nothing else should matter. Too much distraction by arguing about vaxxed vs. unvaxxed. Who is more immune, or who is spreading the disease more etc. etc. It is all meant to distract from the only thing that matters. Bodily autonomy and freedom to choose what goes into my body, Why is this the most important issue? Because it is the injection itself that is the problem, not it's effectiveness, it's durability, risk vs. benefit, etc. Those are all just more distractions from the real purpose of these injections, which are not vaccines. The purpose is to corrupt the most sacred element of life itself. The genetic code that a was gift from your creator, which links you together. The mrna in the vaccine specifically targets that link and severs it. The pure evil behind this is unprecedented. Here are links that will help to clarify what I am trying warn humanity about. This is not religious and I do not identify with any religion. This is scientific conclusion.
My worry is no matter what valid, convincing, undeniable legal arguments are made, no justice will ever be done because at every level, the courts are corrupted. Again, the SC denied an emergency appeal. 🙏 for mercy, a miracle...
Where have you been the last 18 months while people have lost their jobs and families have been torn apart due to vaccine mandates? People have had no choice but to get vaccinated just to put food on the table for their children against their will… absolute disgrace you should be shamed to say you work for the people who employed you!
Psychopaths who rule the world don't care about science, truth, justice... They just can't share anything with others and have to reduce and oppress our number - we became too strong, too powerful, even without having concentrated capital. We reached a technology that allow us to build super houses almost for FREE, to grow food out of earth, to work at home, speak FOR FREE with entire world... Each one of 7 billion people could live in abundance - but, sovereign, independent people do not obey! They are FREE to act as they like - this is what psychopaths can't allow.
I similarly did a study looking at "Case Rate" and "Death Rate" vs. Vax Rate for all the countries in the world, and all the states in the U.S.: Correlation: ZERO.
These studies also demonstrate why it makes no sense that employers mandate testing in the unvaccinated but do not require the vaccinated to test. The vaccinated could be spreading infection without knowing it. By only testing the unvaccinated, you are creating a biased sample that perpetuates the myth of "pandemic of the unvaccinated". BIAS.
Luckily, there are at least a few of us who actually understand what is happening and we will not comply. Despite the desires of the corporate/government elite, there is a control group in this experiment. Jab or job? Fine, fire me. It may take awhile, but the truth will set us free.
Another great article Aaron. You are being tactful when you said the CDC made a mistake. The CDC and FDA know exactly what they're doing. The shots were never about saving lives. The FDA receives 45% of its revenues from industry user fees, so they rely on funding from the industry they regulate. They can't make much on repurposing generic drugs. That's why they obstruct access to HCQ and Ivermectin and push the jabs. The CDC receives millions in donations from the Gates Foundation, which is the second largest donor to the WHO. Fauci has been on the Gates Foundation's Global Vaccine Action Plan's Leadership Council since 2010. Gates became a strategic collaborator with Moderna in January 2016, injecting millions to study infectious diseases.
Fauci/NIAID's scientists collaborated with Moderna to create their jab, and funded their clinical trials, which began March 16, 2020. Government scientists receive millions in personal royalties on gov't funded treatments (i.e. taxpayer $) and it's all perfectly legal. It's one big incestuous cesspool of corruption.
And most people don't even know that the jabs don't reduce the risk of infection. The "95% efficacy" is the 'relative' risk reduction measure, which is the % reduction in infection risk between the placebo group and the vaxxed group, which was .0761% and .044%, respectively, in Pfizer's clinical trial. So it is about a 95% reduction from .761% to .044%. But the risk of infection for BOTH groups was < 1%. The vaccine 'effectiveness' is the 'absolute' risk reduction measure (ARR), which is .761% - .044%, or .7%. So Pfizer's jab reduces the risk of infection by .7%. In fact, the ARR for ALL the Covid shots is < 2%, which the vaccine manufacturers and the FDA did not disclose to the public, ignoring the FDA's own reporting guidelines. A study published in The Lancet confirms all the Covid19 vaccines' ARR is <2%.
Pfizer .9%
Moderna 1.4%
J&J 1.8%
AstraZeneca-Oxford 1.9%
Gamaleya (Sputnik V) 1%
"Covid-19 vaccine efficacy and effectiveness - the elephant (not) in the room"
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(21)00069-0/fulltext
I guess I’m among those who believed from the beginning that mandating an experimental vaccine as happened was never primarily a public health concern but rather an act of arbitrary power.
This is just devastating that we are being forced to take these risks with our bodies for no benefit. I am looking for legal help for my son. He is at University of Kansas Medical Center, he is a medical student. They are basically forcing and coercing him into getting this. This is completely against his religion/philosophical views. He is extremely health conscious. He has a genetic situation which makes him more susceptible to cancer and now they are seeing signals for cancer with this jab. His father died of cancer and many many of his family members have died of cancer. The students were told the University was not legally aloud to ask their vaccination status, but now they are asking and saying they have until October 1st to turn in their vaccination status. It says on the Med Centers website they are not taking Religious exemptions. How can the med center just say they are not taking religious exemptions??
I'm planning to send in my religious exemption request to my employer shortly before their deadline on Dec 15th. I'm tempted to send them these studies but I don't want to appear antagonistic since I'm hoping to keep my job. In my employer's new mandate policy, a Covid-19 vaccine is defined as "a vaccine that effective at both preventing the transmission of the virus that causes Covid-19 and preventing serious illness or death caused by the virus..." I want to ask them where they got the definition of the vaccine. The CDC website states the vaccine may reduce transmission but does not state it can "prevent" transmission. The whole thing is so ridiculous!
“…concluded that an N1 Ct value over 24 should not be taken to indicate the presence of any actual virus”
Oh really? So are we finally admitting that all those ‘positive’ results from when we were cranking the test all the way up to 40 cycles were meaningless?
Thank you for the information. As a scientist I find the data very interesting and all pointing to the same conclusion. You should never try to vaccinate your way out of pandemic while in a pandemic. Several evolutionary biologists and epidemiologists that said the same thing were all cast to the side.
"The lesson is that civil and individual rights should never be contingent upon a medical procedure. Everyone that wants to get vaccinated and boosted is free to do so. But nobody should be coerced to partake in any medical procedure."
That is the bottom line. Nothing else should matter. Too much distraction by arguing about vaxxed vs. unvaxxed. Who is more immune, or who is spreading the disease more etc. etc. It is all meant to distract from the only thing that matters. Bodily autonomy and freedom to choose what goes into my body, Why is this the most important issue? Because it is the injection itself that is the problem, not it's effectiveness, it's durability, risk vs. benefit, etc. Those are all just more distractions from the real purpose of these injections, which are not vaccines. The purpose is to corrupt the most sacred element of life itself. The genetic code that a was gift from your creator, which links you together. The mrna in the vaccine specifically targets that link and severs it. The pure evil behind this is unprecedented. Here are links that will help to clarify what I am trying warn humanity about. This is not religious and I do not identify with any religion. This is scientific conclusion.
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/f7rxh34w0d68tze/AAAvQyARLpyZSOkYjnbTS-75a?dl=0&preview=God+in+the+DNA.mp4#
http://www.voterig.com/divine%20image%20destroyed%20sm.mp4
My worry is no matter what valid, convincing, undeniable legal arguments are made, no justice will ever be done because at every level, the courts are corrupted. Again, the SC denied an emergency appeal. 🙏 for mercy, a miracle...
The injected drug is NOT a vaccine.
Where have you been the last 18 months while people have lost their jobs and families have been torn apart due to vaccine mandates? People have had no choice but to get vaccinated just to put food on the table for their children against their will… absolute disgrace you should be shamed to say you work for the people who employed you!
Psychopaths who rule the world don't care about science, truth, justice... They just can't share anything with others and have to reduce and oppress our number - we became too strong, too powerful, even without having concentrated capital. We reached a technology that allow us to build super houses almost for FREE, to grow food out of earth, to work at home, speak FOR FREE with entire world... Each one of 7 billion people could live in abundance - but, sovereign, independent people do not obey! They are FREE to act as they like - this is what psychopaths can't allow.
Thank you!
Yes.
I similarly did a study looking at "Case Rate" and "Death Rate" vs. Vax Rate for all the countries in the world, and all the states in the U.S.: Correlation: ZERO.
https://timellison.substack.com/p/follow-up-vaccine-effect-on-case
‼🙏‼️Science has finally proved that С0V1D-19 DOES NOT EXIST!!! https://rumble.com/vo459l-the-truth-about-rabies-tobacco-mosaic-virus-graphene-and-the-results-of-con.html?fbclid=IwAR0nzVoNMXwIkkjtgHu6S0huUSwCwIbtal8tXrQ6d7XdYJGuqq-3A2OdV9c