But Aaron, while the 3 old bird flu vaccnes you mentioned are licensed, there are several new vaccines for bird flu for which an EUA has been suggested.
The vaccine being used in Finland on farm and fur workers is a Sequirus H5N8 that was not tested in anyone before it was approved for limited use on 10,000 workers. (There is no bird flu currently in Finland, so we can conclude the 10,000 workers compose the safety trial, while efficacy cannot be trialed.)
Bird flu mRNA vaccines are being developed, as is another Sanofi vaccine. Bottom line: not a single bird flu vaccine has been shown to be sufficiently safe for use. Why would you get vaccinated for pink eye, when only 14 Americans have developed this infection, and all got better quickly, without hospitalization. No one died. The idea of vaccinating for this infection is a scam.
Why do we trust that these and other tests are accurate? Even COVID was a hyped up flu which made people hypochondriac with the testing leading to false positives.
They use tests to get people to take their drugs...
Mess with the number to make a new problem to sell a drug for.
That's why they kept dropping blood pressure numbers and cholesterol etc...
At this point, it's just become a farce. But only a smidgen of people are still getting Covid boosters - which technically makes some 90% of the population anti-vaxxers by definition, so perhaps there is hope...
Hmmm... the adult ppl that organized it should be the ones that are being tested on its safety & efficacy!! And never use infants or children in those trials. Could end up as blatant Big Pharma murder. A travesty
Just becuase the bird flu vaccines aren't very safe or effective doesn't mean you should skip getting one. The safety and efficacy aren't what's important. It's the thought that counts. LOL.
First, prove that the virus even exists. None, so far have ever been proven to exist. So, the vaccine only contains toxins, increasing your overall toxic load, only leading from nothing at best to injury and death at worst. Good luck!
The Seqirus data makes me wonder if we've come to the point where Pig Pfarma spikes the placebos to make their patented trash look better. I'd have once thought that inhuman and inconceivable, but no more.
Unlikely that any "saline" jabs were used as placebos. Likely just the adjuvants minus the target "protein." Or, the new vax against an old version -- or even an unrelated version!
For great insights about vax testing and history, three excellent books come to mind (there are many more of course):
1. Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History. By Suzanne Humphries, MD and Roman Bystrianyk: Website and Ordering Information: https://dissolvingillusions.com/
Remember what a placebo means in vaccine trials. It’s not saline. It’s all the ingredients minus the attenuated virus/ MRNA. So not a lot different. Bad vs really bad.
ALL drug trials of any kind for any drug are a complete scam and an exercise is fraud. Absolutely no drug trial can be trusted, especially with your life. If the faked mRNA trials didn't open your eyes to the endless fraud that is big pharma, then you deserve the death their drugs will grant you.
The danger or choice of pathogen is irrelevant. They have to maintain the state of 'emergency' or they loose their power and it becomes obvious that those who have to give up power have no desire to do so so any bug is a good bug in their eyes, the more the merrier.
But Aaron, while the 3 old bird flu vaccnes you mentioned are licensed, there are several new vaccines for bird flu for which an EUA has been suggested.
The vaccine being used in Finland on farm and fur workers is a Sequirus H5N8 that was not tested in anyone before it was approved for limited use on 10,000 workers. (There is no bird flu currently in Finland, so we can conclude the 10,000 workers compose the safety trial, while efficacy cannot be trialed.)
Bird flu mRNA vaccines are being developed, as is another Sanofi vaccine. Bottom line: not a single bird flu vaccine has been shown to be sufficiently safe for use. Why would you get vaccinated for pink eye, when only 14 Americans have developed this infection, and all got better quickly, without hospitalization. No one died. The idea of vaccinating for this infection is a scam.
This infection is a scam. It's being diagnosed via PCR which can throw false positives.
https://robc137.substack.com/p/pcr-fails-logic-from-the-start-sorry
Why do we trust that these and other tests are accurate? Even COVID was a hyped up flu which made people hypochondriac with the testing leading to false positives.
They use tests to get people to take their drugs...
Mess with the number to make a new problem to sell a drug for.
That's why they kept dropping blood pressure numbers and cholesterol etc...
But these fancy new genetic tests must be real?!
No virus ever. Ever.
Oooh, goody, where can I roll my sleeves up?!
At this point, it's just become a farce. But only a smidgen of people are still getting Covid boosters - which technically makes some 90% of the population anti-vaxxers by definition, so perhaps there is hope...
Hmmm... the adult ppl that organized it should be the ones that are being tested on its safety & efficacy!! And never use infants or children in those trials. Could end up as blatant Big Pharma murder. A travesty
Children should NEVER be test subjects. Pure evil.
Right on.
https://cholecalciferol.substack.com/p/the-ethics-of-medical-trials-need
Eh.... I'll pass. Again.
Just becuase the bird flu vaccines aren't very safe or effective doesn't mean you should skip getting one. The safety and efficacy aren't what's important. It's the thought that counts. LOL.
It's the $$$ that counts.
yep
Here we go again!!
First, prove that the virus even exists. None, so far have ever been proven to exist. So, the vaccine only contains toxins, increasing your overall toxic load, only leading from nothing at best to injury and death at worst. Good luck!
100%
never trust again!
The Seqirus data makes me wonder if we've come to the point where Pig Pfarma spikes the placebos to make their patented trash look better. I'd have once thought that inhuman and inconceivable, but no more.
Unlikely that any "saline" jabs were used as placebos. Likely just the adjuvants minus the target "protein." Or, the new vax against an old version -- or even an unrelated version!
But as Dr. Nass pointed out above (https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/the-bird-flu-vaccine-clinical-trials/comment/68540268), many of these jabs aren't tested at all. And the tests they do perform are a joke and a travesty. No one should trust the results any more. Sadly, vax testing has never been honest. We just didn't know it before.
Perhaps most important, if you have a healthy immune system (good eatin', good sleepin', good exercisin', lots of sunshine) and you use iodine or other nasal and oral gargles at first exposure (https://www.americaoutloud.news/dilute-povidone-iodine-nasal-oral-washes-for-the-prevention-and-treatment-of-covid-19/), you should be just fine! You won't need no shtinkin' vaccine.
For great insights about vax testing and history, three excellent books come to mind (there are many more of course):
1. Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History. By Suzanne Humphries, MD and Roman Bystrianyk: Website and Ordering Information: https://dissolvingillusions.com/
2. Turtles All the Way Down: Vaccine Science and Myth | edited by Zoey O’Toole and Mary Holland: https://www.amazon.com/Turtles-All-Way-Down-Vaccine/dp/9655981460
3. Vax-Unvax: Let the Science Speak (Children’s Health Defense) by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (Author), Brian Hooker (Author), Del Bigtree (Foreword): https://www.amazon.com/Vax-Unvax-Childrens-Health-Defense-Kennedy-ebook/dp/B08X4XQXXK/ref=tmm_kin_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr=
And as a bonus, in case you want to hear eyewitness stories about the horrors of hospitalization in the COVIDEra and beyond, read What the Nurses Saw: An Investigation Into Systemic Medical Murders That Took Place in Hospitals During the COVID Panic and the Nurses Who Fought Back ... Their Patients (Medical System Corruption): https://www.amazon.com/What-Nurses-Saw-Investigation-Corruption/dp/B0CPQVTDRT/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr= Or, watch an excellent video interview with the author Ken McCarthy: https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/what-the-nurses-saw/
More links: https://eolson47.substack.com/p/covid-essential-links
Excellent books, and comment.
🙏
Remember what a placebo means in vaccine trials. It’s not saline. It’s all the ingredients minus the attenuated virus/ MRNA. So not a lot different. Bad vs really bad.
Sometimes it's the prior version of the vaccine, which I believe is common practice for flu vaccines especially.
I wondered that too. Were any adjuvants, preservatives or other additives used in the ‘saline’ jabs?
Thank-you very much for posting this succinct list! I do appreciate knowing the run down.
For study number 3, Sequirus: there’s no way that a saline placebo causes 3.3% or even 15% SAE.
What is the actual placebo that they used? That’s just more vaccine fraud. As Steve Kirsch says: nothing to see here.
ALL drug trials of any kind for any drug are a complete scam and an exercise is fraud. Absolutely no drug trial can be trusted, especially with your life. If the faked mRNA trials didn't open your eyes to the endless fraud that is big pharma, then you deserve the death their drugs will grant you.
Are these vaccines being tested on humans without first being tested on animals? Is the placebo a saline solution?
The danger or choice of pathogen is irrelevant. They have to maintain the state of 'emergency' or they loose their power and it becomes obvious that those who have to give up power have no desire to do so so any bug is a good bug in their eyes, the more the merrier.
Didn't fall for the 2009 scam (let alone 2020), not falling for it now... or ever.
GRACIAS