You must take this product. You cannot sue if injured. You can maybe see the clinical trial safety data in 75+ years. And the deidentified post-licensure safety data – no, you cannot see that either.
Thank you, Aaron, for your dogged determination and fortitude. Keep chipping away. Their refusal to divulge anything can only mean that there is damning evidence that they don't want anyone to see.
WHOA. Now I’m dying to see how the v-safe data compares with VAERS data. We’ve long needed a superior AE tracking system to address the deficiencies in VAERS.
That said, if those of us who have been researching this for almost two years haven’t heard of it, how many of the vaxx-injured/bereaved know v-safe exists and are using it?
BTW, ever notice a certain kind of public official consistently refers to COVID as "this thing"?
That fuckass in Australia, my former assfuck-in-chief in NYC, Bill "Fuck You All In the Ass" Gates, all consistently don't name COVID. It's "this thing." We've got to beat this thing. We've got to get on top of this thing.
It's just a weird linguistic quirk. Normally people step down in either simplicity or length. "COVID" is really quick and not hard to say. If you wanted to somehow abstract it more, I guess you could say "this virus" or "the virus." If you were going full pronoun, "it."
Why "this thing"? If I had to armchair analyze it, I'd say it's because they know they're not talking about a virus on a sufficiently entrenched level that their automatic simplification of language doesn't use "COVID" as the root subject, it's actually using "the public health state of emergency we've made" or something similar.
Just some food for thought.
Pay attention to who says "this thing" instead of COVID or "the virus," and when.
I notice it because I'm a language teacher and speech writer, among other things, and it's such a WEIRD and unnecessary code switch that it pricks my brain whenever I hear it.
In your post the IOM is a NGO sponsored by our government and ran by the Un. They are also involved in the pipeline of illegals coming out of Panama providing transportation for the caravans of illegals.
They also have a contract with state department vaccinating transportation too other stars. Of course they have no disease not mandated for the shot
Interesting. You know one of the names you list is the top dissenter behind the Great Barrington Declaration... Very much opposed to Fauci and the vaccine uber alles cabal. See @ https://gbdeclaration.org/
Kuldorff is pro-vax. He's anti-lockdown and masks, but he's steadfast on that issue. Gupta is also a vaccine developer, working on a pan-influenza shot. Their opposition to lockdown is commendable, however.
I know two people who were in trials. They were only instructed to report known adverse events from a checklist. None of the data will show the true damage.
I would love to know how the V-safe data compares to VAERS data too but when I asked if I could access their data as an independent scientist, I was completely dismissed.
I hope and pray we can! I've been writing and sending research to our Washington State Board of health to prevent them from mandating the vaccination for children to attend public school. There is an exceptional weight of evidence that these inoculations are causing massive harm; it's criminal!
I appreciate your valiant efforts! I assume you already follow Dr. Robert Malone’s Substack (https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/), but if not, that is a must-read for research on harm to children.
Partly because the CDC has stopped publishing updates on the data. The "Preliminary Findings" paper that caused a controversy in July is based on the V Safe pregnancy registry. This study was last updated in September, and didn't include any more results on births/outcomes after the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. Then, three months of silence (annoying because I set it as one of the topics to make central to my sub). Presumably if the results are bad, they will never be published.
So there's nothing to talk about. It's a black box until the FOIA is replied to.
You're exactly right. It's not surprising that the HHS tried to bury the results of the Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare Study and never moved forward to make VAERS the active system it should be.
Pfizer has more power than all world governments. Corporations have gone from a good idea to one that's beyond abused. If we replace corporations with individuals with liability, all this would end.
This has always been my biggest point when asked what it would take to get me to "consider" changing my mind. I get a blank stare every time. Most don't even realize the litigation immunity exists. People are SLOWLY figuring out they've been bamboozled even though many will (potentially literally) die on the vaccine hill.
Actually, ICAN does the same thing — sues and wins re: unmet FOIA requests. I’ve lost track of how many FOIA-related suits they’ve won so far but I haven’t heard of their losing any.
Thank you for doing this on behalf of those of us not in the position to do it for ourselves. I pray daily for you and other journalists I read on SubStack that you will be successful in all your endeavors to protect our freedoms.
I would love to see how the V safe app system operates. I hope the reporting criteria is not the same as was used to report adverse events in the trials. Judging by the CDC’s unwillingness to provide the V Safe data I’m going to assume it’s not. Seems like they have something to hide.
The term"conspiracy theorist" is a comfort blanket that the indoctrinated have been trained to parrot, once uttered it allows the un-inquiring mind to slip back into uninformed ignorance.
“Covid19” is a crime scene operation not a “pandemic”.
The overwhelming evidence that “Covid19” is a massive scam has been at everyone’s fingertips this entire time. Just because the "true believers" of the Covid operation can’t figure this out by now doesn’t make me a “conspiracy theorist”—it makes them a simpleton of the lowest order.
The Pharma ghouls and their investors do not care how many people die. They do not care how many people get hurt. All that matters is protecting the “vaccine narrative.” That narrative is worth trillions of dollars and it’s the key to the largest power grab in human history.
Pharma is the principle racket today, even more so than the military-industrial complex and it is
tightly controlled by the financial aristocracy:
“Covid19” is designed for:
1) Redistribution of wealth (from the poor and middle class to the insanely rich)
2) Fear-induced digital enslavement- The Great Reset/4th IR
3) Pharma making trillions in profit
4) Constant bailouts for the financial sector
5) Entrenchment of the Bio-Security State
The government, Big Pharma, and central banks are using the excuse of a “virus” to hide from the fact that they’re assaulting us on all fronts. And millions of people are signing up for a poisonous, experimental gene therapy believing it’ll protect them from a make-believe virus.
We are in the midst of a low point in human history.
If allowed to introduce “Vaccine Passports “ they win. They will then be able to make people take “the jab” whenever they want. It’s the golden ticket for Big Pharma- quarterly boosters for quarterly profits- the market demands it. Trillions of dollars and complete control.
“Vaccine passports” aren’t about health, they’re about universal control.
A cashless world is also on the agenda. Every transaction – what you pay for, when, where – will be tracked. This also means complete central control of your ability to spend, it can be limited, turned off or withdrawn.
If this is allowed you can be certain it will be followed by a “Carbon Footprint passport” that will transform life into a micro-transaction environment where every move has to be paid for.
”To assent to obvious lies is in some small way to become evil oneself. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. ”
Aaron, I think you're being given the runaround by means of confusing technical language. I'm a database engineer who's dealt with the (European) GDPR among others things. I strongly urge you to consult a data/data privacy specialist to help you with this suit.
"Meaning, in the form that the CDC made the data available to Oracle. "
I suspect that the technical reality underlying this is that the data actually held by Oracle is either
a) NOT deidentified; or
b) only pseudonymised.
"Pseudonymised" means that a true identifying attribute (e.g. SS number) is replaced with a random number, which however does map 1-1 with the real identifier. The 1-1 mapping is necessary because it's valuable to know that the _same_ person reported e.g. 6 adverse events, even without knowing _who_ that person is. The "key", the mapping table, is obviously the No.1 security asset in that scenario.
The key here is the word "aggregate". If you aggregate data enough, to produce totals or a graph, it almost entirely de-identifies itself: all you see is the number "200" - meaning for example "cases of X in males 20-30 in [location]". There are limits to this deidentification, especially if the data is pseudonymised but "enriched" with additional (e.g. demographic) information. This enrichment provides more flexibility and value to reporting, but means that - with interactive OLAP reporting tools which are commonplace - you can quite easily drill down to individuals, e.g. by intersecting "males in [sparsely populated county in North Dakota]" with "[pre-existing very rare medical condition]". It's then theoretically possible to map the resulting 1 pseudonymous person to a real person. (How theoretical that is depends on how private _other_ databases - e.g. medical/demographic ones - are).
Because of this, there is a good privacy argument (whether it's enshrined in law e.g. GDPR, I don't know) to limit _interactive_ access to aggregate reports. By interactive, I mean giving you the tools to produce whatever reports you want. You might produce a very specific report which destroys the deidentification produced by aggregation. On the other hand, this argument doesn't apply to asking for and receiving "innocuous", non-privacy-threatening reports from Oracle.
But this limits your access to the data. And who decides whether a report is "privacy-threatening", so that you can't see it? It's a very grey area. Having worked in tech for decades, I'm pretty sure that a tech company would err on the side of covering their ass in every case.
Where is the dividing line between the non-anonymised and anonymised data?
Here's a scenario which I think is unlikely:
CDC have their _own_ database, with identifying data. They anonymise (or pseudonymise) it and copy it to Oracle. This is unlikely, because what is Oracle's role in this scenario? Merely providing a duplicate database. Why hold your own database in-house and then contract a (n expensive) DB provider to duplicate it?
Far more likely:
The database side is wholly outsourced to Oracle. Oracle hold both identifiable and pseudonymised data. When Oracle (or CDC) claims that Oracle only has access to anonymised data, that just means that there are strong security protocols protecting the identifiable data. For example, I, as a database administrator, could definitely access at least individual-level pseudonymised data (how would I track down bugs otherwise?) - but I have a complex password, 2FA, and I've signed an NDA/a GDPR agreement.
Possibly, CDC staff can also access this individual-level data, with similar security safeguards.
The "anonymisation" is no such thing: merely the effect of aggregation. So I think that by asking for the truly anonymised, leaf-level data, you may be asking for something which doesn't exist.
A better solution might be to ask for _pseudonymised_ leaf-level data, on a "good faith/research" basis. What I mean is, that the data would have to be stored securely, would have to be accessed only by people conducting research who've signed agreements to safeguard privacy (to guard against the "de-aggregation effect" I described above).
Given the _political_ aspects of this case, that's a request that's unlikely to be granted without a fight. But it _has_ been granted before (sorry, I'm a tech specialist, not a specialist in privacy/data law).
My main point: don't let CDC/Oracle's magic technical words confuse you or lead you down the wrong track.
I think this clarification is too important to trust AS to see this comment. I'd encourage you contact him directly, perhaps at the contact for his firm. He'd certainly appreciate knowing this, and it may prepare him for court in a way which might otherwise lead to a loss.
I can't do anything about it. I'm a (n ex-) DB tech, not a lawyer. I commented here to help Aaron (in case he needed help) cut through technical obfuscation from the CDC.
In the jurisdiction I live in, GDPR protects data privacy. It definitely does allow exceptions for some purposes as you describe. But I Am Not A Lawyer, and know even less about US legislation such as hippa.
Thank you, Aaron, for your dogged determination and fortitude. Keep chipping away. Their refusal to divulge anything can only mean that there is damning evidence that they don't want anyone to see.
WHOA. Now I’m dying to see how the v-safe data compares with VAERS data. We’ve long needed a superior AE tracking system to address the deficiencies in VAERS.
That said, if those of us who have been researching this for almost two years haven’t heard of it, how many of the vaxx-injured/bereaved know v-safe exists and are using it?
Go get ’em, Aaron!! 👏🙏💪
As far as I'm concerned v-safe is a fox detection system written by foxes to track hen deaths by foxes.
😹🐓🦊
BTW, ever notice a certain kind of public official consistently refers to COVID as "this thing"?
That fuckass in Australia, my former assfuck-in-chief in NYC, Bill "Fuck You All In the Ass" Gates, all consistently don't name COVID. It's "this thing." We've got to beat this thing. We've got to get on top of this thing.
It's just a weird linguistic quirk. Normally people step down in either simplicity or length. "COVID" is really quick and not hard to say. If you wanted to somehow abstract it more, I guess you could say "this virus" or "the virus." If you were going full pronoun, "it."
Why "this thing"? If I had to armchair analyze it, I'd say it's because they know they're not talking about a virus on a sufficiently entrenched level that their automatic simplification of language doesn't use "COVID" as the root subject, it's actually using "the public health state of emergency we've made" or something similar.
Just some food for thought.
Pay attention to who says "this thing" instead of COVID or "the virus," and when.
Now *that* is a fascinating theory. I hadn’t noticed it before, but now I most certainly will!
I notice it because I'm a language teacher and speech writer, among other things, and it's such a WEIRD and unnecessary code switch that it pricks my brain whenever I hear it.
No wonder you’re such a linguistic acrobat and artist of profanity! 😆
you mean the invisible enemy this thing...
Correct.
I personally refuse to call it COVID as we were “groomed” to call it that. I always refer to it as “the rona”
I typically use whu-flu
FluBah
Hacksxxxine
Viruganda
Covidope
IsoLa
Harmaceuticals
Vaxxport
NeedleRape
Death jab
ClotShot
Bill Gatekeeper
Felon Fawci fraud
War criminals
ICC
Fauxci
Good ones.....
I'm KINDA.... leaning towards .... Willy Hates and or Andy Fu-Ouchi for TOP runners UP the gallows POLL!
I like Kung Flu and The Chinese Virus because I dislike being told what to call things and because fuck the CCP.
That's why Bill Gatekeeper texts.. Vx'd he says
He knows they are vaxxines not vac
Hacksxxxine I say
He says Vx'd he knows it is XXX poison
In your post the IOM is a NGO sponsored by our government and ran by the Un. They are also involved in the pipeline of illegals coming out of Panama providing transportation for the caravans of illegals.
They also have a contract with state department vaccinating transportation too other stars. Of course they have no disease not mandated for the shot
Great reveal!
Interesting. You know one of the names you list is the top dissenter behind the Great Barrington Declaration... Very much opposed to Fauci and the vaccine uber alles cabal. See @ https://gbdeclaration.org/
Kuldorff is pro-vax. He's anti-lockdown and masks, but he's steadfast on that issue. Gupta is also a vaccine developer, working on a pan-influenza shot. Their opposition to lockdown is commendable, however.
I know two people who were in trials. They were only instructed to report known adverse events from a checklist. None of the data will show the true damage.
I would love to know how the V-safe data compares to VAERS data too but when I asked if I could access their data as an independent scientist, I was completely dismissed.
Thank you for trying!
They really are brazen, aren’t they. Let’s hope Aaron and his firm can make some headway on this.
I hope and pray we can! I've been writing and sending research to our Washington State Board of health to prevent them from mandating the vaccination for children to attend public school. There is an exceptional weight of evidence that these inoculations are causing massive harm; it's criminal!
I appreciate your valiant efforts! I assume you already follow Dr. Robert Malone’s Substack (https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/), but if not, that is a must-read for research on harm to children.
Yes, thank you!
Exactly. I just looked up the app on my phone Playstore and dont fund it. Nor have I seen it advertised.
First I'd heard of it
I read several hours a day for like the past month a lot more
So that means 2 report systems, makes me suspicious.
Next they can claim neither existed...? by George....
Partly because the CDC has stopped publishing updates on the data. The "Preliminary Findings" paper that caused a controversy in July is based on the V Safe pregnancy registry. This study was last updated in September, and didn't include any more results on births/outcomes after the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. Then, three months of silence (annoying because I set it as one of the topics to make central to my sub). Presumably if the results are bad, they will never be published.
So there's nothing to talk about. It's a black box until the FOIA is replied to.
Hey, whatever happened to those Lois Lerner communications?
Please refer for my post 5 above yours, for the real VAERS data!
Thanks, Joh! I love OpenVAERS and frequently reference it, as in “Letter to a Holocaust Denier” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-a-holocaust-denier).
I couldn't find it. Can you repost it as a reply?
You're exactly right. It's not surprising that the HHS tried to bury the results of the Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare Study and never moved forward to make VAERS the active system it should be.
Thank you!
Pfizer has more power than all world governments. Corporations have gone from a good idea to one that's beyond abused. If we replace corporations with individuals with liability, all this would end.
End the immunity for the corporate needleRapists
This has always been my biggest point when asked what it would take to get me to "consider" changing my mind. I get a blank stare every time. Most don't even realize the litigation immunity exists. People are SLOWLY figuring out they've been bamboozled even though many will (potentially literally) die on the vaccine hill.
Veritas projects tells me, many should hang in Big Pharma, not just higher ups.
I loved Ronald Reagan but I have to ask what was he thinking???
You should team up with Judicial Watch. They have an excellent track record of getting their FOIA requests granted through aggressive lawsuits.
Actually, ICAN does the same thing — sues and wins re: unmet FOIA requests. I’ve lost track of how many FOIA-related suits they’ve won so far but I haven’t heard of their losing any.
Time for us peasants to pull out the pitchforks.
Thank you for doing this on behalf of those of us not in the position to do it for ourselves. I pray daily for you and other journalists I read on SubStack that you will be successful in all your endeavors to protect our freedoms.
God be with you Aaron Siri and team.
Thank you. God bless you.
I don't go for petitions, but we should list specific names,
Lemmon. DeBlasio, Newsome andrews
and job categories (Twitter fact checker) that should be put on trial for crimes against humanity.
I have seen posts of local news stations asking about how people died from covid. Instead anguished and furious stories of vaccine deaths...
How could they not know people want them hung?
Let's tell them... I predict in USA alone....
20 million would sign it...
Australia. 85% of adults
He looks Gruesome
Gravel Threesome
Gruesome Nuisance
Gavin Knewsomething
How's that hacksxxxine injury doing? We ought to ask
After his injury he went to school to promote child sacrifice
Confirmed he probably got bells palsy,,? There was earlier conjecture he probably did...
Guillaine Barr syndrome speculation
Interesting! I will not die from myocarditis from kill shot.... but either of them could kill me by heart attack... utterly furious
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QwM5KpoPPrg
Could another non governmental VAERS be started,? Also this would be stern rebuke of vaers...
Where are bulldog OIG auditors and investigators? MIA
These guys,? I don't trust them (UN, aor any globalist org, beyond getting people moving...
VAERS is a major pillar of these fraud for mass murder scheme
https://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&client=ms-android-tmus-us-revc&source=android-browser&q=iom
Bless you!
I would love to see how the V safe app system operates. I hope the reporting criteria is not the same as was used to report adverse events in the trials. Judging by the CDC’s unwillingness to provide the V Safe data I’m going to assume it’s not. Seems like they have something to hide.
Thank you for pursuing this. I want to say that this lack of transparency is unbelievable. Sadly, it’s all too believable.
Clearly they’re hiding something really, really bad. We need to know what it is.
These corporate entities and the people who direct them are crooks.
Crooks need to hide their crimes.
But that sounds like a.... a conspiracy theory or something
Don't worry, you're in solid company
https://novusordowatch.org/2014/01/traditional-catholic-conspiracy-nuts/
The term"conspiracy theorist" is a comfort blanket that the indoctrinated have been trained to parrot, once uttered it allows the un-inquiring mind to slip back into uninformed ignorance.
“Covid19” is a crime scene operation not a “pandemic”.
The overwhelming evidence that “Covid19” is a massive scam has been at everyone’s fingertips this entire time. Just because the "true believers" of the Covid operation can’t figure this out by now doesn’t make me a “conspiracy theorist”—it makes them a simpleton of the lowest order.
The Pharma ghouls and their investors do not care how many people die. They do not care how many people get hurt. All that matters is protecting the “vaccine narrative.” That narrative is worth trillions of dollars and it’s the key to the largest power grab in human history.
Pharma is the principle racket today, even more so than the military-industrial complex and it is
tightly controlled by the financial aristocracy:
“Covid19” is designed for:
1) Redistribution of wealth (from the poor and middle class to the insanely rich)
2) Fear-induced digital enslavement- The Great Reset/4th IR
3) Pharma making trillions in profit
4) Constant bailouts for the financial sector
5) Entrenchment of the Bio-Security State
The government, Big Pharma, and central banks are using the excuse of a “virus” to hide from the fact that they’re assaulting us on all fronts. And millions of people are signing up for a poisonous, experimental gene therapy believing it’ll protect them from a make-believe virus.
We are in the midst of a low point in human history.
If allowed to introduce “Vaccine Passports “ they win. They will then be able to make people take “the jab” whenever they want. It’s the golden ticket for Big Pharma- quarterly boosters for quarterly profits- the market demands it. Trillions of dollars and complete control.
“Vaccine passports” aren’t about health, they’re about universal control.
A cashless world is also on the agenda. Every transaction – what you pay for, when, where – will be tracked. This also means complete central control of your ability to spend, it can be limited, turned off or withdrawn.
If this is allowed you can be certain it will be followed by a “Carbon Footprint passport” that will transform life into a micro-transaction environment where every move has to be paid for.
”To assent to obvious lies is in some small way to become evil oneself. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. ”
– Theodore Dalrymple
Yep. Keep exposing the nefarious agenda behind the greatest nonexistent virus ever. Happy new year.
Excellent! When someone dismisses something out of hand, invoking criminal conspiracy... I think they are an idiot
My brother was a prosecutor and he attacks them.... hey, your police investigate criminal conspiracies
Aaron, I think you're being given the runaround by means of confusing technical language. I'm a database engineer who's dealt with the (European) GDPR among others things. I strongly urge you to consult a data/data privacy specialist to help you with this suit.
"Meaning, in the form that the CDC made the data available to Oracle. "
I suspect that the technical reality underlying this is that the data actually held by Oracle is either
a) NOT deidentified; or
b) only pseudonymised.
"Pseudonymised" means that a true identifying attribute (e.g. SS number) is replaced with a random number, which however does map 1-1 with the real identifier. The 1-1 mapping is necessary because it's valuable to know that the _same_ person reported e.g. 6 adverse events, even without knowing _who_ that person is. The "key", the mapping table, is obviously the No.1 security asset in that scenario.
The key here is the word "aggregate". If you aggregate data enough, to produce totals or a graph, it almost entirely de-identifies itself: all you see is the number "200" - meaning for example "cases of X in males 20-30 in [location]". There are limits to this deidentification, especially if the data is pseudonymised but "enriched" with additional (e.g. demographic) information. This enrichment provides more flexibility and value to reporting, but means that - with interactive OLAP reporting tools which are commonplace - you can quite easily drill down to individuals, e.g. by intersecting "males in [sparsely populated county in North Dakota]" with "[pre-existing very rare medical condition]". It's then theoretically possible to map the resulting 1 pseudonymous person to a real person. (How theoretical that is depends on how private _other_ databases - e.g. medical/demographic ones - are).
Because of this, there is a good privacy argument (whether it's enshrined in law e.g. GDPR, I don't know) to limit _interactive_ access to aggregate reports. By interactive, I mean giving you the tools to produce whatever reports you want. You might produce a very specific report which destroys the deidentification produced by aggregation. On the other hand, this argument doesn't apply to asking for and receiving "innocuous", non-privacy-threatening reports from Oracle.
But this limits your access to the data. And who decides whether a report is "privacy-threatening", so that you can't see it? It's a very grey area. Having worked in tech for decades, I'm pretty sure that a tech company would err on the side of covering their ass in every case.
Where is the dividing line between the non-anonymised and anonymised data?
Here's a scenario which I think is unlikely:
CDC have their _own_ database, with identifying data. They anonymise (or pseudonymise) it and copy it to Oracle. This is unlikely, because what is Oracle's role in this scenario? Merely providing a duplicate database. Why hold your own database in-house and then contract a (n expensive) DB provider to duplicate it?
Far more likely:
The database side is wholly outsourced to Oracle. Oracle hold both identifiable and pseudonymised data. When Oracle (or CDC) claims that Oracle only has access to anonymised data, that just means that there are strong security protocols protecting the identifiable data. For example, I, as a database administrator, could definitely access at least individual-level pseudonymised data (how would I track down bugs otherwise?) - but I have a complex password, 2FA, and I've signed an NDA/a GDPR agreement.
Possibly, CDC staff can also access this individual-level data, with similar security safeguards.
The "anonymisation" is no such thing: merely the effect of aggregation. So I think that by asking for the truly anonymised, leaf-level data, you may be asking for something which doesn't exist.
A better solution might be to ask for _pseudonymised_ leaf-level data, on a "good faith/research" basis. What I mean is, that the data would have to be stored securely, would have to be accessed only by people conducting research who've signed agreements to safeguard privacy (to guard against the "de-aggregation effect" I described above).
Given the _political_ aspects of this case, that's a request that's unlikely to be granted without a fight. But it _has_ been granted before (sorry, I'm a tech specialist, not a specialist in privacy/data law).
My main point: don't let CDC/Oracle's magic technical words confuse you or lead you down the wrong track.
I think this clarification is too important to trust AS to see this comment. I'd encourage you contact him directly, perhaps at the contact for his firm. He'd certainly appreciate knowing this, and it may prepare him for court in a way which might otherwise lead to a loss.
Thank you, excellent suggestion - I've found the Siri Glimstad contact form and pointed out this comment.
So, about GDPR , how come they dont do anything about peoples rights? GDPR rules been broken big time so what are you doing regarding this?
I can't do anything about it. I'm a (n ex-) DB tech, not a lawyer. I commented here to help Aaron (in case he needed help) cut through technical obfuscation from the CDC.
When i said you, i didnt really mean you, but gdpr but i get it. Happy new year
...umm
In the jurisdiction I live in, GDPR protects data privacy. It definitely does allow exceptions for some purposes as you describe. But I Am Not A Lawyer, and know even less about US legislation such as hippa.
They say VAERS is unreliable?
How V-safe is reliable? I’ve never heard about V-safe app. Asked my friends who got the shot, they also never heard about this app.
Aaron, thank you for doing this for all of us.
Keep up The Fight Aaron