Seeing the 7.7% figure gave me goosebumps as that is exactly what Rasmussen just found in its poll, which corroborated Steve Kirsch's calculations as well:
And yet the branch covidians shrug it off....when my employee elected to get the jab (after getting Covid, and me paying for him to sit at home for two weeks) on a Thursday...guess what? He had to take Friday off, couldn’t work. Did that get reported? I guarantee it didn’t. Did my parents adverse reaction to the jabs, WHICH THEY TOOK AFTER GETTING THE OG WUHAN VIRUS get reported?!? Nope. My son who’s been congested on and off for almost two years now since he was coerced to get it to play sports. Nope. This world....😡
The lie about natural immunity along with the lies about the efficacy of HCQ and Ivermectin I believe constitute the greatest fraud ever perpetrated against humanity. Anyone who pushed that MISINFORMATION should be remembered and delt with accordingly.
Hi Margaret😊 I didn't know attorney Siri had a substack! I just found this! 😊
To your point. When do you think we will see the pitchforks and torches?
Perhaps never. I saw a doctor two years ago
from a foreign land (South Africa maybe) on a zoom call meeting with other docs. I can't for the life of me remember his name but he summed it up perfectly.
The vaccine is the perfect poison. If you want to poison someone and get away with it you don't want them to know you've poisoned them.
Putting time and distance between the jab and the death is key along with the varying ways in which these poor people died makes this the perfect poison. And people lined up to take it themselves.
Great question, Stevec1776. I wish I knew the answer, but we do appear to be achieving a groundswell toward my original goal of peaceful mass noncompliance as articulated in my second essay:
Thanks but you essay is preaching to choir where I'm concerned... Not for one second did I fall for the bullshit. I'm not bragging, just stating the fact. I was confrontng Karen's before it was in vogue...
Aaron, you are an amazing lawyer doing work that is so important.I’m a legal secretary for a US law firm in London. They are a liberal woke firm. They mandated the vaccine for US staff and tried to do this in London. We were excluded from the office from October until in early March they finally let the unvaccinated staff back into the office. We were told we had to wear masks when not at our desks, test every day with photographic evidence. I’ve had members of staff shout at me “where’s your mask?” We’ve been discriminated against and yet the people who’ve had covid in the office have been vaccinated. We finally said enough is enough and asked why we were being treated unfairly and why should we test every day which is damaging us. The management ignored us for weeks and then finally said we could test once a week. If the law had allowed in the UK to sack us, they would have done so. One of my other friends who is unvaccinated, we both had covid in February both mild and we used ivermectin so have natural immunity so why they treat us differently is beyond me, it can’t be nothing other than punishment and retribution. Any new member of staff has to be vaccinated. They have only just dropped clients proving vaccination or testing and mask wearing if not vaccinated. On our town hall call they reiterated week after week get the vaccine. Saying you couldn’t return to work if you weren’t. I know of quite a few who got the vaccine because of that. 6 of us held out. It is the best decision we made not to have it. There are vaccine injured, one young lawyer who was so sick with covid and had heart problems. My boss has eye problems with partial loss in one eye, another lady eye problems and inflammation in her temporal artery.
Also we’ve been visiting the USA for over 25 years and we owned a house in Florida but we decided to sell as we’ve been banned from visiting and as much as we loved our home we were not prepared to get the vaccine.
Thank you for all your brilliant work you do with Del his team which i love every week. ❤️
It's appalling how you have been treated, especially by a law firm which is exhibiting deeply unlawful behavior. I could cite chapter and verse, but suffice to say they are desecrating the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. Oh, and the European Convention on Human Rights by discriminating on the basis of medical status.
Thank you for all you do Aaron. Saying that the “health” apparatus is broken implies that they are well-intentioned to begin with… that’s not an assumption I would make… Rockefeller built the allopathic medical-industrial complex as a for-profit business. And relentlessly crushed any alternative models that would cut into his supply of patients..
My understanding is that the Pharma companies immunity from prosecution is null and void if they committed fraud in order to obtain emergency use authorisation for their covid injection products.
It seems very clear to me that Pfizer clearly manipulated/falsified their efficacy and safety data from the revelations published in the BMJ.
If my understanding is correct can Pfzer now be sued by their victims or the bereaved surviros of their victims?
One of the ony hopes I can see is if the pharma giants are sued into oblivion for their crimes.
Guess again. Once the "national public health emergency" was declared on Mar 13, 2020, all rules changed and we function under a different set of laws regarding the EUA. This is a military "demonstration", in cahoots with big pharma as a public facade. The vaccine is classified as a "countermeasure", not a medical treatment. TPTB covered all their bases, laying the groundwork starting in 1948. This article is long. Read the first part, skim the middle if you must, then read the summary at the end.
Holy CRAP Grammy, thanks for sharing that article! Wow. I'm only a third of the way through - if that - but this lady really put some serious time into deconstructing our federal government and the laws they have implemented. Soo much stuff I never had a clue about. FDR pledged lives of American people (registered at birth through Social Security program) as collateral/debt slaves to international bankers, against national debt. TRULY UNREAL. Thank you again!
You're welcome. Katherine Watt and Sasha Latypova have been phenomenal in uncovering hidden history and actions by our government against us. The lies we've been told...🙁
Funny that "they" like to accuse us "anti-vaxxers" as "Cherry picking" data - heard all the time, most recently from Sean Plunket, who accused Steve Kirsch of this (BEFORE accepting, and eventually BACKING OUT of a debate with Steve!).
Yet it's "They" who have written the book on cherry picking - ie NOT wanting to release the V-Safe data that they invited the public to provide, and then accumulated - and ultimately DID NOT LIKE the results seen. Hide the V-Safe data, hide the FDA data and materials provided them by Pfizer, for 75 years ?
WHO enjoys a good game of "hide the data" the most?!
Great work by Siri and Glimstad - again, and as always!
I'm a retired firefighter who was one of the first to get Phizer (12/23/20). A week after my 2nd shot, I developed DVT in both calves, and the following week had a PE that put me in the hospital. At the time, I thought it was a post-surgical complication from my outpatient appendectomy. However, a year later, I finally made the possible/probable vax injury connection after going down the Steve Kirsch rabbit-hole.
Like me, at the time of their injury, probably several others using V-Safe never reported their injury since they didn't associate it with the shot ( I didn't think that I was supposed to report ALL injuries). In addition, on my 1-year anniversary in January '21, I finally reported my hospitalization to V-Safe.
They left a voice message that I should fill out a VAERS report (no further follow up). I haven't, yet Largely because I felt it was a waste of time since the CDC wasn't going to do anything with it anyways. So, I've certainly contributed to VAERS under reporting.
P.S. I wrote this last month (in another comment to Jessica Rose) before noticing the altered V-safe weekly check-in question while closely reading the v-safe protocol 9see my other longer comment). No wonder I didn't report my injury at the time. The altered question asks you only to report if you "believe" it was related to the vax. Why would I? I had bought into the "safe and effective" BS. Why else would I be one of the first to get the shot?
Let’s not forget these are the closed end responses in V Safe. While the numbers of open-end, descriptive comments will likely be fewer, they should be very interesting... But will they be released?
Mr. Siri, thanks for your great work all around. I follow VAERS data fairly closely. It was interesting that the V-Safe questionnaire seemed designed not to align well with VAERS. I did the best I could to match symptom descriptions in the two data sets. I found that, depending on the category, adverse events were reported to V-Safe at rates between 17 and 209 times the rate in VAERS.
Let us be conservative and assume that the prevalence ratio is only 17, the smallest ratio I discovered. Over 32 thousand deaths have been reported to VAERS from CoVID injections. This could imply some 544 thousand deaths in reality. This is in the same order of magnitude as Pantazatos and Seligmann's estimate of vaccine mortality rate of 0.04% (with more than 600 million doses administered, we deduce about 250 thousand deaths): https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355581860_COVID_vaccination_and_age-stratified_all-cause_mortality_risk
It appears that only about 4% of the medically attended health events reported by V-safe participants ever made it into the VAERS system. So, any rates of serious adverse events (SAE) would reflect an under reporting factor (URF) of about 26.
Grace Lee (Chair of ACIP) referred to V-Safe an “enhanced” passive survelliance system that could be used to calculate rates of SAE. According to the CDC protocol (“V-safe active surveillance for COVID-19 vaccine safety, Version 5”) If a participant reported a “health impact event” then the VAERS Call Center was supposed to conduct “active telephone follow-up ... to check on the patient and take a VAERS report if appropriate.”
(p. 13, V-Safe protocol) Then, “Rates of serious events as well as adverse events of special interest (AESI) following COVID-19 vaccination will be generated using VAERS reports solicited via vsafe to define the numerator and v-safe participants as the denominator … Reporting rates for each AESI will be calculated and compared to established background rates.”
So, assuming the CDC actually performed any analysis, the SAE event would reflect a URF of 26, about 4% of the actual rate reported by V-Safe participants.
As Rasmussen points out the 7% (or 7.7% in V-Safe) with severe or major injuries is further undercounted because people who die cannot report, at least in the Rasmussen poll.
Less than 10 million people registered for V-Safe out of 332 million US residents and cell phone penetration of at least 80%. And this population that registered was highly skewed towards younger people, and skewed against older people who don't want, or cannot afford, a cell phone. Other studies showed that younger people did not have as many reactions to the vax, and older people had many more reactions. So the V-Safe data does not represent what really happened.
Also, self-reporting is notoriously inaccurate and subjective.
I have a niece who registered, and she was injured. But sadly she in unable to get a doctor to diagnose her (due to the vaccine injury) even though it did debilitate her. Before the shot- healthy young mother with ZERO health problems. Almost immediately after the shot, bed-ridden and now riddled with life-long health injuries.
The doctors fight to protect pharma and to protect this ongoing extermination.
Thanks for getting this data for us! There seems to be a general trend towards less (healthy) responses over time, so there is probably a loss of interest factor. I’ve seen in various fora archived online, complaints by users being alerted to respond at odd hours of the night… So somehow obtaining data on app uninstalls and disabling notifications would be interesting.
but two other big points toward under-reporting:
* As you have pointed out — I think in #2, but also in last week’s Senator Johnson event, useful more serious conditions were not included in the options to report.
* As a self reported service, which requires owner authentication to use, this BY DEFINITION cannot report ANY debilitating adverse events.
The 7.7% is an important tip of the iceberg number to see. There is likely worse under the surface. An interesting piece of data to extract would be a mapping of these to any VAERS entries associated with each individual. This could be presented as vsafe entry to VAERS id pairings without compromising privacy. Determining this requires user ID data in both databases only they have, but with that should be a trivial amount of work on their side. There is not enough unique data otherwise to join these data sources. (https://open.substack.com/pub/drflurmgooglybean/p/42-is-the-answer?r=r6d2x&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web ) Tying to other data they have, especially including death records, would also be very useful.
Aaron Siri a lawyer doing what all should be doing but so few are. Much gratitude! I want to say superstar except one must be careful lionizing anyone :)
Seeing the 7.7% figure gave me goosebumps as that is exactly what Rasmussen just found in its poll, which corroborated Steve Kirsch's calculations as well:
• https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/rasmussen-poll-shows-the-covid-vaccines
And yet the branch covidians shrug it off....when my employee elected to get the jab (after getting Covid, and me paying for him to sit at home for two weeks) on a Thursday...guess what? He had to take Friday off, couldn’t work. Did that get reported? I guarantee it didn’t. Did my parents adverse reaction to the jabs, WHICH THEY TOOK AFTER GETTING THE OG WUHAN VIRUS get reported?!? Nope. My son who’s been congested on and off for almost two years now since he was coerced to get it to play sports. Nope. This world....😡
Some German insurers do not cover these vaccine injuries, or deaths, as they have now classified them as self inflicted.
Maybe your employee should consider that, before getting you to pay for his poor decisions.
The lie about natural immunity along with the lies about the efficacy of HCQ and Ivermectin I believe constitute the greatest fraud ever perpetrated against humanity. Anyone who pushed that MISINFORMATION should be remembered and delt with accordingly.
I just can't believe people fell for it.
Painfully true, Aaron 😿
Here's the link to the Rasmussen video that Steve references.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljrMPvk4mjo
Hi Margaret😊 I didn't know attorney Siri had a substack! I just found this! 😊
To your point. When do you think we will see the pitchforks and torches?
Perhaps never. I saw a doctor two years ago
from a foreign land (South Africa maybe) on a zoom call meeting with other docs. I can't for the life of me remember his name but he summed it up perfectly.
The vaccine is the perfect poison. If you want to poison someone and get away with it you don't want them to know you've poisoned them.
Putting time and distance between the jab and the death is key along with the varying ways in which these poor people died makes this the perfect poison. And people lined up to take it themselves.
SMFH....
Great question, Stevec1776. I wish I knew the answer, but we do appear to be achieving a groundswell toward my original goal of peaceful mass noncompliance as articulated in my second essay:
• “COVID IS OVER! … If You Want It” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/covid-is-over-if-you-want-it)
Thanks but you essay is preaching to choir where I'm concerned... Not for one second did I fall for the bullshit. I'm not bragging, just stating the fact. I was confrontng Karen's before it was in vogue...
I was going to say the same thing!
Aaron, you are an amazing lawyer doing work that is so important.I’m a legal secretary for a US law firm in London. They are a liberal woke firm. They mandated the vaccine for US staff and tried to do this in London. We were excluded from the office from October until in early March they finally let the unvaccinated staff back into the office. We were told we had to wear masks when not at our desks, test every day with photographic evidence. I’ve had members of staff shout at me “where’s your mask?” We’ve been discriminated against and yet the people who’ve had covid in the office have been vaccinated. We finally said enough is enough and asked why we were being treated unfairly and why should we test every day which is damaging us. The management ignored us for weeks and then finally said we could test once a week. If the law had allowed in the UK to sack us, they would have done so. One of my other friends who is unvaccinated, we both had covid in February both mild and we used ivermectin so have natural immunity so why they treat us differently is beyond me, it can’t be nothing other than punishment and retribution. Any new member of staff has to be vaccinated. They have only just dropped clients proving vaccination or testing and mask wearing if not vaccinated. On our town hall call they reiterated week after week get the vaccine. Saying you couldn’t return to work if you weren’t. I know of quite a few who got the vaccine because of that. 6 of us held out. It is the best decision we made not to have it. There are vaccine injured, one young lawyer who was so sick with covid and had heart problems. My boss has eye problems with partial loss in one eye, another lady eye problems and inflammation in her temporal artery.
Also we’ve been visiting the USA for over 25 years and we owned a house in Florida but we decided to sell as we’ve been banned from visiting and as much as we loved our home we were not prepared to get the vaccine.
Thank you for all your brilliant work you do with Del his team which i love every week. ❤️
It's appalling how you have been treated, especially by a law firm which is exhibiting deeply unlawful behavior. I could cite chapter and verse, but suffice to say they are desecrating the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. Oh, and the European Convention on Human Rights by discriminating on the basis of medical status.
x_O <<< [your boss] "You're fired you anti-vaxxer!"
Thank you for all you do Aaron. Saying that the “health” apparatus is broken implies that they are well-intentioned to begin with… that’s not an assumption I would make… Rockefeller built the allopathic medical-industrial complex as a for-profit business. And relentlessly crushed any alternative models that would cut into his supply of patients..
and profits.
Seems to line up with Rasmussen poll results.
https://twitter.com/Rasmussen_Poll/status/1600549307752628230?s=20&t=qucUrRAUcbnaIi6ga_-y9A
Great minds—I just posted the same :-)
My understanding is that the Pharma companies immunity from prosecution is null and void if they committed fraud in order to obtain emergency use authorisation for their covid injection products.
It seems very clear to me that Pfizer clearly manipulated/falsified their efficacy and safety data from the revelations published in the BMJ.
If my understanding is correct can Pfzer now be sued by their victims or the bereaved surviros of their victims?
One of the ony hopes I can see is if the pharma giants are sued into oblivion for their crimes.
Guess again. Once the "national public health emergency" was declared on Mar 13, 2020, all rules changed and we function under a different set of laws regarding the EUA. This is a military "demonstration", in cahoots with big pharma as a public facade. The vaccine is classified as a "countermeasure", not a medical treatment. TPTB covered all their bases, laying the groundwork starting in 1948. This article is long. Read the first part, skim the middle if you must, then read the summary at the end.
https://open.substack.com/pub/bailiwicknews/p/american-domestic-bioterrorism-program?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android
Holy CRAP Grammy, thanks for sharing that article! Wow. I'm only a third of the way through - if that - but this lady really put some serious time into deconstructing our federal government and the laws they have implemented. Soo much stuff I never had a clue about. FDR pledged lives of American people (registered at birth through Social Security program) as collateral/debt slaves to international bankers, against national debt. TRULY UNREAL. Thank you again!
You're welcome. Katherine Watt and Sasha Latypova have been phenomenal in uncovering hidden history and actions by our government against us. The lies we've been told...🙁
Thank You so much Aaron Siri, for everything!!!
Funny that "they" like to accuse us "anti-vaxxers" as "Cherry picking" data - heard all the time, most recently from Sean Plunket, who accused Steve Kirsch of this (BEFORE accepting, and eventually BACKING OUT of a debate with Steve!).
Yet it's "They" who have written the book on cherry picking - ie NOT wanting to release the V-Safe data that they invited the public to provide, and then accumulated - and ultimately DID NOT LIKE the results seen. Hide the V-Safe data, hide the FDA data and materials provided them by Pfizer, for 75 years ?
WHO enjoys a good game of "hide the data" the most?!
Great work by Siri and Glimstad - again, and as always!
I'm a retired firefighter who was one of the first to get Phizer (12/23/20). A week after my 2nd shot, I developed DVT in both calves, and the following week had a PE that put me in the hospital. At the time, I thought it was a post-surgical complication from my outpatient appendectomy. However, a year later, I finally made the possible/probable vax injury connection after going down the Steve Kirsch rabbit-hole.
Like me, at the time of their injury, probably several others using V-Safe never reported their injury since they didn't associate it with the shot ( I didn't think that I was supposed to report ALL injuries). In addition, on my 1-year anniversary in January '21, I finally reported my hospitalization to V-Safe.
They left a voice message that I should fill out a VAERS report (no further follow up). I haven't, yet Largely because I felt it was a waste of time since the CDC wasn't going to do anything with it anyways. So, I've certainly contributed to VAERS under reporting.
P.S. I wrote this last month (in another comment to Jessica Rose) before noticing the altered V-safe weekly check-in question while closely reading the v-safe protocol 9see my other longer comment). No wonder I didn't report my injury at the time. The altered question asks you only to report if you "believe" it was related to the vax. Why would I? I had bought into the "safe and effective" BS. Why else would I be one of the first to get the shot?
Let’s not forget these are the closed end responses in V Safe. While the numbers of open-end, descriptive comments will likely be fewer, they should be very interesting... But will they be released?
Mr. Siri, thanks for your great work all around. I follow VAERS data fairly closely. It was interesting that the V-Safe questionnaire seemed designed not to align well with VAERS. I did the best I could to match symptom descriptions in the two data sets. I found that, depending on the category, adverse events were reported to V-Safe at rates between 17 and 209 times the rate in VAERS.
Let us be conservative and assume that the prevalence ratio is only 17, the smallest ratio I discovered. Over 32 thousand deaths have been reported to VAERS from CoVID injections. This could imply some 544 thousand deaths in reality. This is in the same order of magnitude as Pantazatos and Seligmann's estimate of vaccine mortality rate of 0.04% (with more than 600 million doses administered, we deduce about 250 thousand deaths): https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355581860_COVID_vaccination_and_age-stratified_all-cause_mortality_risk
It appears that only about 4% of the medically attended health events reported by V-safe participants ever made it into the VAERS system. So, any rates of serious adverse events (SAE) would reflect an under reporting factor (URF) of about 26.
Grace Lee (Chair of ACIP) referred to V-Safe an “enhanced” passive survelliance system that could be used to calculate rates of SAE. According to the CDC protocol (“V-safe active surveillance for COVID-19 vaccine safety, Version 5”) If a participant reported a “health impact event” then the VAERS Call Center was supposed to conduct “active telephone follow-up ... to check on the patient and take a VAERS report if appropriate.”
(p. 13, V-Safe protocol) Then, “Rates of serious events as well as adverse events of special interest (AESI) following COVID-19 vaccination will be generated using VAERS reports solicited via vsafe to define the numerator and v-safe participants as the denominator … Reporting rates for each AESI will be calculated and compared to established background rates.”
Unfortunately, according to Jessica Rose [ https://jessicar.substack.com/p/the-under-reporting-factor-in-vaers ] and the OpenVAERS [ https://openvaers.com/faq/how-to-calculate-the-urf-using-v-safe-and-vaers?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email ] only about 4% of V-Safe participants with a medically attended event talked with the call center AND had them fill out a VAERS report.
So, assuming the CDC actually performed any analysis, the SAE event would reflect a URF of 26, about 4% of the actual rate reported by V-Safe participants.
As Rasmussen points out the 7% (or 7.7% in V-Safe) with severe or major injuries is further undercounted because people who die cannot report, at least in the Rasmussen poll.
You're doing great work.
Less than 10 million people registered for V-Safe out of 332 million US residents and cell phone penetration of at least 80%. And this population that registered was highly skewed towards younger people, and skewed against older people who don't want, or cannot afford, a cell phone. Other studies showed that younger people did not have as many reactions to the vax, and older people had many more reactions. So the V-Safe data does not represent what really happened.
Also, self-reporting is notoriously inaccurate and subjective.
I have a niece who registered, and she was injured. But sadly she in unable to get a doctor to diagnose her (due to the vaccine injury) even though it did debilitate her. Before the shot- healthy young mother with ZERO health problems. Almost immediately after the shot, bed-ridden and now riddled with life-long health injuries.
The doctors fight to protect pharma and to protect this ongoing extermination.
Thanks for getting this data for us! There seems to be a general trend towards less (healthy) responses over time, so there is probably a loss of interest factor. I’ve seen in various fora archived online, complaints by users being alerted to respond at odd hours of the night… So somehow obtaining data on app uninstalls and disabling notifications would be interesting.
but two other big points toward under-reporting:
* As you have pointed out — I think in #2, but also in last week’s Senator Johnson event, useful more serious conditions were not included in the options to report.
* As a self reported service, which requires owner authentication to use, this BY DEFINITION cannot report ANY debilitating adverse events.
The 7.7% is an important tip of the iceberg number to see. There is likely worse under the surface. An interesting piece of data to extract would be a mapping of these to any VAERS entries associated with each individual. This could be presented as vsafe entry to VAERS id pairings without compromising privacy. Determining this requires user ID data in both databases only they have, but with that should be a trivial amount of work on their side. There is not enough unique data otherwise to join these data sources. (https://open.substack.com/pub/drflurmgooglybean/p/42-is-the-answer?r=r6d2x&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web ) Tying to other data they have, especially including death records, would also be very useful.
Thanks for all your work!
Aaron Siri a lawyer doing what all should be doing but so few are. Much gratitude! I want to say superstar except one must be careful lionizing anyone :)