43 Comments

Seeing the 7.7% figure gave me goosebumps as that is exactly what Rasmussen just found in its poll, which corroborated Steve Kirsch's calculations as well:

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/rasmussen-poll-shows-the-covid-vaccines

Expand full comment

Aaron, you are an amazing lawyer doing work that is so important.I’m a legal secretary for a US law firm in London. They are a liberal woke firm. They mandated the vaccine for US staff and tried to do this in London. We were excluded from the office from October until in early March they finally let the unvaccinated staff back into the office. We were told we had to wear masks when not at our desks, test every day with photographic evidence. I’ve had members of staff shout at me “where’s your mask?” We’ve been discriminated against and yet the people who’ve had covid in the office have been vaccinated. We finally said enough is enough and asked why we were being treated unfairly and why should we test every day which is damaging us. The management ignored us for weeks and then finally said we could test once a week. If the law had allowed in the UK to sack us, they would have done so. One of my other friends who is unvaccinated, we both had covid in February both mild and we used ivermectin so have natural immunity so why they treat us differently is beyond me, it can’t be nothing other than punishment and retribution. Any new member of staff has to be vaccinated. They have only just dropped clients proving vaccination or testing and mask wearing if not vaccinated. On our town hall call they reiterated week after week get the vaccine. Saying you couldn’t return to work if you weren’t. I know of quite a few who got the vaccine because of that. 6 of us held out. It is the best decision we made not to have it. There are vaccine injured, one young lawyer who was so sick with covid and had heart problems. My boss has eye problems with partial loss in one eye, another lady eye problems and inflammation in her temporal artery.

Also we’ve been visiting the USA for over 25 years and we owned a house in Florida but we decided to sell as we’ve been banned from visiting and as much as we loved our home we were not prepared to get the vaccine.

Thank you for all your brilliant work you do with Del his team which i love every week. ❤️

Expand full comment

Thank you for all you do Aaron. Saying that the “health” apparatus is broken implies that they are well-intentioned to begin with… that’s not an assumption I would make… Rockefeller built the allopathic medical-industrial complex as a for-profit business. And relentlessly crushed any alternative models that would cut into his supply of patients..

Expand full comment

My understanding is that the Pharma companies immunity from prosecution is null and void if they committed fraud in order to obtain emergency use authorisation for their covid injection products.

It seems very clear to me that Pfizer clearly manipulated/falsified their efficacy and safety data from the revelations published in the BMJ.

If my understanding is correct can Pfzer now be sued by their victims or the bereaved surviros of their victims?

One of the ony hopes I can see is if the pharma giants are sued into oblivion for their crimes.

Expand full comment

Thank You so much Aaron Siri, for everything!!!

Expand full comment

Funny that "they" like to accuse us "anti-vaxxers" as "Cherry picking" data - heard all the time, most recently from Sean Plunket, who accused Steve Kirsch of this (BEFORE accepting, and eventually BACKING OUT of a debate with Steve!).

Yet it's "They" who have written the book on cherry picking - ie NOT wanting to release the V-Safe data that they invited the public to provide, and then accumulated - and ultimately DID NOT LIKE the results seen. Hide the V-Safe data, hide the FDA data and materials provided them by Pfizer, for 75 years ?

WHO enjoys a good game of "hide the data" the most?!

Great work by Siri and Glimstad - again, and as always!

Expand full comment

I'm a retired firefighter who was one of the first to get Phizer (12/23/20). A week after my 2nd shot, I developed DVT in both calves, and the following week had a PE that put me in the hospital. At the time, I thought it was a post-surgical complication from my outpatient appendectomy. However, a year later, I finally made the possible/probable vax injury connection after going down the Steve Kirsch rabbit-hole.

Like me, at the time of their injury, probably several others using V-Safe never reported their injury since they didn't associate it with the shot ( I didn't think that I was supposed to report ALL injuries). In addition, on my 1-year anniversary in January '21, I finally reported my hospitalization to V-Safe.

They left a voice message that I should fill out a VAERS report (no further follow up). I haven't, yet Largely because I felt it was a waste of time since the CDC wasn't going to do anything with it anyways. So, I've certainly contributed to VAERS under reporting.

P.S. I wrote this last month (in another comment to Jessica Rose) before noticing the altered V-safe weekly check-in question while closely reading the v-safe protocol 9see my other longer comment). No wonder I didn't report my injury at the time. The altered question asks you only to report if you "believe" it was related to the vax. Why would I? I had bought into the "safe and effective" BS. Why else would I be one of the first to get the shot?

Expand full comment

Let’s not forget these are the closed end responses in V Safe. While the numbers of open-end, descriptive comments will likely be fewer, they should be very interesting... But will they be released?

Expand full comment

Mr. Siri, thanks for your great work all around. I follow VAERS data fairly closely. It was interesting that the V-Safe questionnaire seemed designed not to align well with VAERS. I did the best I could to match symptom descriptions in the two data sets. I found that, depending on the category, adverse events were reported to V-Safe at rates between 17 and 209 times the rate in VAERS.

Let us be conservative and assume that the prevalence ratio is only 17, the smallest ratio I discovered. Over 32 thousand deaths have been reported to VAERS from CoVID injections. This could imply some 544 thousand deaths in reality. This is in the same order of magnitude as Pantazatos and Seligmann's estimate of vaccine mortality rate of 0.04% (with more than 600 million doses administered, we deduce about 250 thousand deaths): https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355581860_COVID_vaccination_and_age-stratified_all-cause_mortality_risk

Expand full comment

As Rasmussen points out the 7% (or 7.7% in V-Safe) with severe or major injuries is further undercounted because people who die cannot report, at least in the Rasmussen poll.

Expand full comment

Less than 10 million people registered for V-Safe out of 332 million US residents and cell phone penetration of at least 80%. And this population that registered was highly skewed towards younger people, and skewed against older people who don't want, or cannot afford, a cell phone. Other studies showed that younger people did not have as many reactions to the vax, and older people had many more reactions. So the V-Safe data does not represent what really happened.

Also, self-reporting is notoriously inaccurate and subjective.

Expand full comment

I have a niece who registered, and she was injured. But sadly she in unable to get a doctor to diagnose her (due to the vaccine injury) even though it did debilitate her. Before the shot- healthy young mother with ZERO health problems. Almost immediately after the shot, bed-ridden and now riddled with life-long health injuries.

The doctors fight to protect pharma and to protect this ongoing extermination.

Expand full comment

Thanks for getting this data for us! There seems to be a general trend towards less (healthy) responses over time, so there is probably a loss of interest factor. I’ve seen in various fora archived online, complaints by users being alerted to respond at odd hours of the night… So somehow obtaining data on app uninstalls and disabling notifications would be interesting.

but two other big points toward under-reporting:

* As you have pointed out — I think in #2, but also in last week’s Senator Johnson event, useful more serious conditions were not included in the options to report.

* As a self reported service, which requires owner authentication to use, this BY DEFINITION cannot report ANY debilitating adverse events.

The 7.7% is an important tip of the iceberg number to see. There is likely worse under the surface. An interesting piece of data to extract would be a mapping of these to any VAERS entries associated with each individual. This could be presented as vsafe entry to VAERS id pairings without compromising privacy. Determining this requires user ID data in both databases only they have, but with that should be a trivial amount of work on their side. There is not enough unique data otherwise to join these data sources. (https://open.substack.com/pub/drflurmgooglybean/p/42-is-the-answer?r=r6d2x&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web ) Tying to other data they have, especially including death records, would also be very useful.

Thanks for all your work!

Expand full comment

Aaron Siri a lawyer doing what all should be doing but so few are. Much gratitude! I want to say superstar except one must be careful lionizing anyone :)

Expand full comment