42 Comments
User's avatar
Rob (c137)'s avatar

What doesn't make sense is that pharma can easily manipulate data to make studies look good.

They did this with Vioxx and SSRIs, both of which have huge issues.

Yet they didn't do this with the COVID trial, which showed issues despite the propaganda saying safe and effective.

Same for the new shots, whether mRNA rsv or the new infusions, all of which show more issues vs placebo.

It makes you wonder why pharma is handing the FDA data that shows issues and the FDA just rubber stamps it.

Perhaps it's a game of blackmail or an insurance policy to protect big pharma? Who knows with these insane corrupt politicians.

Also, why is Kennedy not stopping the COVID emergency that his predecessor extended to 2029???? It's purely his call, no extra approval needed!

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/not-for-sale-an-open-letter-to-hhs

Expand full comment
Crixcyon's avatar

The FDA is paid to look at the data with closed eyes. Most drugs are put on the market this way. It's a gigantic racket full of money and payoffs for all.

Expand full comment
Rob (c137)'s avatar

Yep but pharma gave them good data with Vioxx and oxycontin.

The current shots and aduhelm which came out before COVID shots were approved had bad data.....

Makes you wonder

Expand full comment
Wendy Leonard's avatar

pharma is altering the reports to Vaers retroactivly , over and over. Just look at "Welcome the eagle" on substack he has thousands of altered reports

Expand full comment
Jerry Taylor's avatar

Aaron Siri is profiting from conspiracy theories and anti-vaccine propaganda. He does not understand immunology or epidemiology.

Expand full comment
Rob (c137)'s avatar

haha troll

Expand full comment
M. Blake's avatar

Who is paying for your adorable koala presence here today?

Expand full comment
BPatti's avatar

Goodness, Jerry Taylor! You clearly have no idea what you are talking about.

Expand full comment
Tardigrade's avatar

😵‍💫

Expand full comment
Kari E. Samson's avatar

Thank you, Arron, for making the truth known about this and so many other vax playbooks and the Coup d’état. You are a litigator's litigator. I have great confidence that your voice will be heard on this topic.

Expand full comment
Alison Conley's avatar

Bottom line - We do not need ACIP/CDC at all. Great news that RFK is replacing members of ACIP with a fresh perspective but bottom line the US does not need ACiP. It would be great to see a bolder move 1. Remove the vaccine liability shield and 2. Dissolve ACIP. ACIP is all about generating revenue dollars for pharma with little interest in public health.

The FDA is the foundation for drug safety but just need to make sure those at the top of FDA are not incentivized by pharma aka Dr. Peter Marks who was head of biologics for the last couple of years. Marks promoted gene therapies and ignored safety including safety of the Covid injections.

Expand full comment
TE's avatar

Absolutely. The VRBPAC also needs a facelift. Start with removing Paul Offitt.

Expand full comment
Keep America Free's avatar

Amen! Let’s make that change!

Expand full comment
Shelley Peterson's avatar

Excellent - a good way to even the playing fields.

Expand full comment
Allen's avatar

No need for the CDC or FDA or ACIP or any of the other alphabet rubber-stamping agencies.

The entire conversation around vaccines, how to make them safer", "restoring trust", "regulating them effectively "etc., is at the most fundamental level a descent into madness.

"Hey, let's talk about the pros and cons of forcing children to have poisons injected into them on a regular basis."

The belief that injecting synthetic chemicals made by habitually criminal companies who profit from perpetual disease somehow produces health is not only ridiculous and unproven— it is a foundational teaching of a dangerous religious cult that western medicine has become.

From their inception to today's mRNA monstrosities vaccines have done nothing but cause massive and systemic harm to the human biological system.

Vaccination is and has always been a racketeering operation.

Expand full comment
Stephanie S's avatar

Good suggestions; if only they are implemented.

Expand full comment
SA's avatar

Can we also look into funding sources for groups like this: https://www.voicesforvaccines.org/financial-partners/

They’re sending out letters questioning the ACIP reorg. Are our tax $ going toward the campaign?

https://www.voicesforvaccines.org/content/uploads/2025/06/ACIP-statement.pdf

Expand full comment
Brianna's avatar

Aaron Siri questioned Stanley Plotkin about Voices for Vaccines when he deposed him!

Expand full comment
Alan's avatar

Voices for Vaccines is part of The Task Force for Global Health a 501c(3).

Voices for Vaccines is funded by the TFGH. I found the IRS Form 990 for 2022 for the TFGH. On it is listed...

Part VIII Statement of Revenue

Government grants (contributions) 1e 63,870,674

So, yes tax dollars are going there.

Expand full comment
Crixcyon's avatar

They own the table, the room and the building. The vaccine terrorism will continue unabated.

Expand full comment
Jim Dandy's avatar

Looking like they own Makaray and Kennedy too.

Expand full comment
Lynn Russell's avatar

It was all show n tell, wasn’t it? With no substance or consequence. Do they call that a “red herring”? Something to throw you off the truth. Sad, isn’t it?

Expand full comment
Tom Childs's avatar

Thank God you’re weighing in on this. You’ve got a great batting average promoting coherence and profound common sense relative to safety and fairness.

Expand full comment
Brianna's avatar

NVIC would be great as well!

Expand full comment
Dave S's avatar

Dr. Josef Mengele would be like a kid in a candy store under these decades-long conditions.

Expand full comment
Alice in Wonderland's avatar

Going forward, may Kennedy see fit to deem *whatever it takes* to be necessary, on all fronts. I am not generally in favour of lawyers/judges doing too much "deeming," but it's the exception that proves the rule, no?

Expand full comment
Lisa H's avatar

Please and thank you.

Expand full comment
Chjuhnke's avatar

I support enthusiastically adding more balance to ACIP. As it existed before the RFKJr. housecleaning, the membership existed to rubber stamp Big Pharma.

SAVE OUR CHILDREN.

Expand full comment