Merriam-Webster defines “anti-vaxxer” as “a person who opposes … regulations mandating vaccination” and NBC poll finds majority of Americans oppose vaccine mandate.
Anti-vaxxer, noun: someone who thinks for himself/herself and comes to a conclusion that is inconsistent with, or in opposition to, mandated official narratives. Originated in the early twenty-first century in the United States during outbreaks of a globally orchestrated pandemic designed to subjugate the world population via both psychological and biological methods. Used derogatively, but later transitioned to have associations of courage, morality, truthfulness, and protecting the rights of the oppressed.
Eg: Like the early forefathers of the twenty-first century, John fancied himself an anti-vaxxer as he protested the unfair executive order.
The antivaxxers realized the jab was a biological weapon and opted not to have it injected into their bodies. After, the vaxxers received their fifth and final jab the cull was complete and the antivaxxers rebuilt society.
Vaccines never worked. You should thank plumbers for saving humanity, instead. They got rid of outhouses, piped poop miles away, and made you wash your crappy hands before flipping our burgers. Plumbers are the heroes, not pharma or doctors.
Dont take RNA shot. There is no pandemic. 600,000 die each year from cancer, but government doesn't force chemo and radiation on us. 660,000 die each year from heart disease, but we aren't force fed anti-cholesterol drugs. Smoking kills 480,000 yearly but government doesn't destroy economy with shutdowns. Only 400,000 die each year WITH covid, not from it. There is no pandemic. Tell your friends, family, and employers to calm down. Its time to arrest government servants for mass murder using genetic experiments.
And the coal miners and oil field workers, who provide the energy to build and install plumbing and sanitation systems, and fuel to build and operate the garbage trucks, and the automobiles that replaced horses with their disease-ridden horse poop, and the roads and railroads that the plumbers' trucks, garbage trucks, and cars and health infrastructure uses to deliver these health benefits. (Corrected error in deleted previous post.)
If the toxic jab ever becomes truly mandatory other ‘treatments’ will follow, and we’ll be taking all sorts of mandatory crap to pad big pharma’s pockets.
I would go as far as to say that no medical intervention has ever eradicated any accute illness. Sure, they do a fine job treating the symptoms until a person can heal (if it doesn't kill them first), but clean hot water is the source of disease irradication wherever it's available.
Since Fauci came on board the NIH, in 1968, Americans went from 6% with chronic diseases to 54% by 2006. Fauci transformed the NIH into an incubator of pharmaceutical products.
People need to wake up to the fact that the pharmaceutical industry is not there to cure diseases. They are there to make money. We have more vaccines and medicines today than ever in human history, and consequently we have more diseases than ever.... so, the industry is not there to cure anyone but to make us sick and profit from our sickness. And that alone is a major human rights violation.
I read The True Anthony Facci by R.F.Kenneday Jr. It took me back to when I was a new nurse, taking care of AIDS patients. Faccui's drug cocktail was awful for AIDS patients. Because of this experience I don't trust anything Faccui recommends for treating anything.
According to some sources not connected to the pharmaceutical industry, statins lower cholesterol but do not decrease probability of heart disease. The only benefit is prettier numbers on a piece of paper. High cholesterol is a side effect of bad diet and lack of exercise, which frequently lead to heart disease. Lowering cholesterol by artificial means does nothing to address the actual cause of the heart disease, which is bad lifestyle choices, not cholesterol levels. There is a genetic component, but What we can actually control is more relevant.
I have embraced to be labeled anti vaxxer and wear it as the badge or honor. I ask hard questions that make provax feel uncomfortable. I didn't know asking questions can be seen as being subversive
Before this I would say I was vaccine hesitant. Now? Now I have zero trust in government, big pharma and our entire medical profession in Australia (they are not allowed to even discuss vaccine issues), plus reading what Robert F Kennedy Jr has been saying, they yes, now I am anti vaxxer even by the old definition.
Yes me too. I never questioned getting myself or my kids vaccinated. But now with the disgusting push of this experiment. I have lost all faith in all vaccines as the manufacturers and so called regulators are clearly not working in the people’s best interest. Ignoring so much negative data. It is a disgrace. And of course what then have they already done previously? Makes you wonder? As a I am seeing more of my friends relatively young get cancer something I don’t remember the generation before having so many under 50 getting? I have really started to question it all...
The more one learns about how the world actually works, the less one wants to work in such a deceptive, corrupted and gamed world. The -illionaires' cabals seem to have psychologized every interest to their advantage; everything on the table drips or bleeds down into their shimmering coffers. If it hasn't been rigged, the potential returns were obviously minuscule.
I heard the term long ago and dismissed it. In 2016, out of curiosity, I watched the documentary Vaxxed and I was floored. I had no idea how many more vaccines had been added to the children's schedule and that Congress had given Pharma total immunity.
Congress has been completely co-opted by Big Pharma. I was never an anti-vaxxer in the strict sense of the word, but eventually concluded the flu vaccine was pretty worthless. And, once you discover how Congress has given Pharma total legal vaccine immunity among their other bad decisions, such as requiring so many childhood vaccinations and crippling VAERS, it makes you even more skeptical about trusting either Pharma or government.
I saw 2 California doctors, Dr. ERickson and another brave one, give 2 talks with Q and A afterwards... logical, clear cut, questions that should have been answered by medical hierarchy....
It went viral, then suppressed.
As you say, you're not allowed to even ask questions.
I am not a scientist, but I know scientific method... reading scientific articles is fun to me.
I knew something terribly wrong.
I was HHS auditor... I believe FDA and CDC have received tremendous number of Audit findings on approval process
I do the same. It’s an insult only to those who blindly swallow this totalitarian regime’s authority and Big Pharma’s agenda. As for myself, I have different standards. [Read: higher standards.]
How about this? Injecting unknown ingredients into my own or my children's bodies with unknown side effects with uncontestable proof of (IN)EFFICACY, and agreeing to go back for more is called anti neuronal apoptosis.
Cell death and cogent thinking is now prolific. I believe we might surmise these epigenetic changes are a result of environmental poisons called the media which support a wayward and criminal government.
I have been an anti-vaxxer for at least 22 years. As a medical student giving high school sports physicals, I was told to then give vaccines. I said No, due to First Do No Harm. Admin was aghast, but could do nothing, because they still upheld the motto. Formaldehyde, aluminum hydroxide, sometimes thimerosal and sometimes active pathogens were in the old, less scary vaccines.
My definition of vaccination: A superstitious ritual involving a mildly poisonous stew that only serves to disrupt optimal immune function.
I have been a hard core anti-vaxxer myself for several years now. One of the best explanations of my reasons for that was in a video-taped presentation several years ago by the mother of a vaccine-injured child. The video and transcript are available at https://www.ageofautism.com/2018/11/why-is-this-legal-presentation-on-vaccines-by-laura-hayes.html. I would highly recommend watching/reading it for anyone who is currently sitting on the fence, or anyone who already an anti-vaxxer and needs some good talking points to share with family and friends.
In a while, 100% will be "anti-vaxxers. That's because everyone that got injected will be dead of heart attack, brain bleed, general organ failure, breakthrough infection, or some such. And to their last breath, the victims will blame either the anti-vaxxers or some newly-discovered alternate cause. The "safe and effective" injection cannot be blamed, ever!
They are already blaming climate change, and a made up condition called post pandemic stress syndrome, that oddly enough requires a cardiologist (instead of a psychologist) to treat. They should have called it covid-19 vaccine syndrome.
Preach!! I am anti-vaccine. I have been since they harmed my child. All of that poison, and those responsible for producing it and mandating it on the innocent, need to go straight into the bin.
I'm heart-broken to hear that M.E., God Bless you and yours dearest ones..!!! "...and/or straight to the lake of fire..." unless of course they repent and get Saved!
Thank you Karyse Day [1] for drawing attention to the problem of the bias and intimidation inherent in the term "anti-vaxxer". The term has been around perhaps since the 19th century but has evolved a new context. Three years ago I drew attention to the remarks of Seth Berkley, director of the vaccine lobby organisation GAVI, in the Spectator proposing that "anti-vaxxers" be excluded from social media, which meant in effect not only that certain people should not be allowed on social media but that criticism of vaccines should not be allowed on a generic basis - an extremely serious matter[2].
Unfortunately, this has also been a hobby-horse of the present Prime Minister. In August last year Reuter's recorded Boris Johnson as saying [3]:
“I’m afraid people have just been listening to that superstitious mumbo-jumbo on the internet, all that anti-vax stuff..."
On 24 September 2020 he told the UN [4]:
“There are today people who are still actually anti-science, a whole movement called ‘the anti-vaxxers’ who refuse to acknowledge the evidence that vaccinations have eradicated smallpox and who by their prejudices are actually endangering the very children they want to protect."
By February this year the Sunday Telegraph was reporting [5]:
"Posting anti-vaccine propaganda on social media could become criminal offence, Law Commissioner says
New Law Commissioner Penney Lewis is leading wide-ranging review into whether UK's offence and abuse laws are fit for the Social Media age..."
And once again the Prime Minister was quoted last month [6]:
“There’s all these anti-vaxxers now,” Johnson told medical workers at a doctor’s surgery in London. “They are nuts, they are nuts.”
While there are a lot of very fed up people I am extremely dubious there is a movement called "the anti-vaxxers" or that they are posting propaganda: at the very best this is a simplistic claim [7,8]. At a time when the government is supposedly trying to earn trust for a range of potential SAR-CoV-2 vaccines the continued disparagement and repression of people who raise questions about a class of products - which after all cannot be inherently safe - speaks for itself. It creates an atmosphere of prejudice and intimidation - such as described in the Cumberlege review [9] and should be seen and understood for what it is.
I find it astonishing that the side that promotes independence and personal autonomy (the “anti-vaxers”) is accused of pushing “propaganda”. I thought propaganda could only be pushed by those with power?
The “anti-vax” side doesn’t seek to coerce or condemn. Instead, we seek to inform/provide an alternative explanation and to WARN. Since when has warning people (without force, mind you) become a crime?
The government’s actions don’t surprise me; how many are falling for it does.
I'm for vaccines that are based on long-term studies and provide immunity from disease, not fake ones like the Covid one that is so ineffective that the very definition of "vaccine" had to be changed to accommodate it.
Every vaccine is a Russian roulette bullet waiting to happen. The only difference between the standard vaccines and COVID-19 ones however is that they have the whole barrel loaded.
Please name one vaccine that has provided immunity from disease that is superior to naturally acquired immunity. Vaccines compromise natural immunity by artificial means. The only benefits from vaccines are received by the manufacturers, who are exempt from the trail of death and destruction they leave behind. Congress has taken away their incentive to make them safe by protecting the manufacturers from liability no matter how much damage they cause. Why should they waste their money on safety studies? If you read the package inserts you will not find a single vaccine that does not come with the risk of serious side effects.
A vaccine is inherently untrustworthy because it is purportedly “preventative” — in comparison to medications which you can see first hand work because your disease went away. You can’t see if the vaccine worked, firsthand, in yourself, because the default protocol is to expect adverse side-effects, even in a real vaccine. And you never had the disease in the first place, as the vaccine is preventative; so you can’t see the disease heal in yourself firsthand. Some vaccines work. However, many more are shots that abuse this loophole — because in essence Big Pharma can put anything they want in it, and chalk it up to “normal adverse side-effects,” and “not being full-proof preventative.” Vaccines are real, abuse of pseudo-vaccines is much more real.
I don’t think it’s vaccines that are being objected to as much as the mandates. At least, it’s the mandates *I* object to. (Hell, I don’t think ANY substance should be illegal…or mandatory.)
I couldn’t find your other comment, but I call myself the “world’s worst LDS” because it’s true.
I converted 24 years ago, and I’ve been active on and off. I like the doctrine fine, but I lack the “dogmatic” gene, and the church culture is pretty damned dogmatic (and, frankly, kind of weird).
I am also incredibly disappointed in the leadership, who instructed all members to get the vax. I’m not okay with that—members should have been counseled to educate themselves and to speak to a trusted medical provider, not blindly accept brand new technology.
Thank you. I thought it was funny because I had some childhood experience with the church. Somewhat traumatizing, but I recovered lol. Like you said, "kind of weird". Refreshing to hear a mormon swear though! You earned the title!
Omg, I’m worse than just swearing Mormon. Much, much worse. (A “normal” person would think I’m fine, if a little “edgy”, but I don’t fit in with the vast majority of the other ward ladies who are my age or younger. 🤷🏼♀️😏)
I got my Endowments and was sealed to my husband a year after I joined the church, in 1998. Our son was 13 mos old when he was sealed to us (same day I was Endowed and we were sealed). We raised our son in the church when he was little. He liked Primary and the camp outs.
When our son was about 10, my husband (the reason I converted) got a rare form of viral encephalitis that injured him permanently. He’s been housebound at best, and bed-bound at worst with post-viral chronic fatigue syndrome (and some other chronic issues that are permanent) for well over a decade. I’ll spare you the details.
It wasn’t long before I had to drag our son to church: all of his church friends moved (we’re in So Cal and everyone went to Utah, natch.) and he was stuck with the Young Men’s class below his, since no one was his age. My son wasn’t into sports, eating, being in a band; instead, he played video games and wrote satire. He refused Scouting, the Trek, a mission (😄), Seminary, and any Sunday meeting where Scouts or missions were discussed (he’d go read scripture in the hall). They ALL thought he was weird. (Like, THIS weird: https://youtu.be/7WABqc2cOII) 🤣
I stopped making him go pretty quickly. But I kept going another seven years or so, and liked the old ladies from Relief Society. When our ward merged with another, I said adiós. I stayed in touch with a very few, and all old.
Interestingly, we all still tithe—even our son, who turned out to be gay (shocker)—(I would give away 10+% of my gross income, regardless), but we’re so bad that we refuse to answer the door or the phone for the missionaries.
Oh, and since my husband uses THC to treat his dystonia (he has that, too), well, so do I. That’s not very Mormonly of me.
See, I AM the WORST LDS…ever. Anyone would agree. 👍🏼😉
I believed you. Sorry about your husband. I normally don't judge people but you seem like a good person. Nothing wrong with a little T now and then to maintain sanity in this global asylum being run by criminal psychopaths
Yeah this is my fave. It sounds fittingly virtuous. We purebloods are the only ones who can safely donate blood and organs. Our plasma can and does cure the sick. We should be selling this message. We should meet every use of the term 'anti-vaxxer' with "pure blood" and these facts. It will collapse the 'anti-vaxxer' narrative overnight. People want to be on the side that's winning, but people suffer from FOMO too. Who would want to be 'vaccinated' when they coul be 'pure blood', eternal source of healthy blood, capable of curing the sick!!! Its a better virtue signal, and if progressives love anything it's proclaiming themselves the most virtuous. They won't be able to resist the allure of being pure of blood, source of health. Even they know deep down the vaccine story is flimsy. Let's take back the narrative. Make it your mission to declare yourself proudly as the virtuous pureblood you are to everyone who will listen. Own it! Make them tremble in shame in the face of your purity. Your posturing will defeat theirs easily. Reclaim your destiny Purebloods!
🤗 Thank-you for that resounding pep talk! It is also, my favorite, and though, I knew all the things you mentioned, I had not "done the math" and put it all together. To me it was just the truth.....and, well, you know, Harry Potter. 😉
I am admitting, I was so naive about everything until COVID. Something wasn’t right but I couldn’t explain it. Everything was still unicorns and skittles for me. It took the lockdowns, the mask mandates, the suppression of early treatments and even the mention of them, public officials admittedly withholding and changing information, and the absolute fear everyone (including me) constantly felt. The censorship and the total denial of the vaccine injured was it. It took a long time, plus I wasn’t willing to think people could really put money/power/whatever over someone else’s life. Ignorance, I thought, was bliss. But now I know. And honestly, not being ignorant is very blissful. It’s truth. It gives me strength and more courage than I knew I had. I’ll never go back, I won’t ever be vaccinated with these covid shots, and I’ll stand aside all of you who also know and are so brave to speak up. But I’m keeping the skittles!
love it!! It is a very hard concept to wrap your brain around!! They ARE putting power/money above lives!! They could care less!! The entire system has been captured including most of congress. They make a lot of decisions based on special interest and not us. It all needs to be gutted and rebuilt. We can't even tryst the FDA anymore. It's hard to forsee how we can successfully move forward this way. There are zero checks and balances currently and that's not good for anyone!
In the U.K. a hugely popular morning TV show ran a poll asking if vaccinations should be mandatory. After 45,000 replies, where 89% said no, the poll was dropped and never mentioned again. We are not just fighting govt, but also the bought and paid for MSM
I will gladly wear that "badge of honor". As a Canadian I am sadly in the minority. A recent Angus Reid poll in Canada said 70% of Canadians favor firing people in medical professions, paramedics, firefighters,teachers,air line personnel and police officers. Poll based on 1000 people. We're screwed.
Polls are often used to publish a narrative and are not true polls. Rasmussen reports is the most accurate pollsters now, the others are garbage (Pew might have some legitimacy still but that remains to be seen.)
I agree entirely about what you said about polls. I have rarely believed in polls but unfortunately a lot of people do. People are so easy to manipulate and polls are another tool in the narrative to sway people.
I can't help but wonder if people moving away from use of land lines, using do not call registry, and using call screening have had an effect on accuracy of polls these days. They seems to always be wrong. Er perhaps they always were for propaganda and I just never noticed...
Good point. Pollsters using the phone to poll people will only get through to people who don’t know how to manipulate their smartphone to block calls from unknown numbers.
More accurate is “We polled 1000 tech-illiterate people, and 70% of them are in favor of mandatory vaccines.” Geh. 🤦♀️
Entry from future dictionary (~50 years)
Anti-vaxxer, noun: someone who thinks for himself/herself and comes to a conclusion that is inconsistent with, or in opposition to, mandated official narratives. Originated in the early twenty-first century in the United States during outbreaks of a globally orchestrated pandemic designed to subjugate the world population via both psychological and biological methods. Used derogatively, but later transitioned to have associations of courage, morality, truthfulness, and protecting the rights of the oppressed.
Eg: Like the early forefathers of the twenty-first century, John fancied himself an anti-vaxxer as he protested the unfair executive order.
Love this!
The antivaxxers realized the jab was a biological weapon and opted not to have it injected into their bodies. After, the vaxxers received their fifth and final jab the cull was complete and the antivaxxers rebuilt society.
The vax may turn out to be the actual weapon. A testimony to greed
This is a great definition, well done!
Vaccines never worked. You should thank plumbers for saving humanity, instead. They got rid of outhouses, piped poop miles away, and made you wash your crappy hands before flipping our burgers. Plumbers are the heroes, not pharma or doctors.
Dont take RNA shot. There is no pandemic. 600,000 die each year from cancer, but government doesn't force chemo and radiation on us. 660,000 die each year from heart disease, but we aren't force fed anti-cholesterol drugs. Smoking kills 480,000 yearly but government doesn't destroy economy with shutdowns. Only 400,000 die each year WITH covid, not from it. There is no pandemic. Tell your friends, family, and employers to calm down. Its time to arrest government servants for mass murder using genetic experiments.
Garbage collectors are also heroes. Imagine all the disease that would spread if they walked off the job.
And the coal miners and oil field workers, who provide the energy to build and install plumbing and sanitation systems, and fuel to build and operate the garbage trucks, and the automobiles that replaced horses with their disease-ridden horse poop, and the roads and railroads that the plumbers' trucks, garbage trucks, and cars and health infrastructure uses to deliver these health benefits. (Corrected error in deleted previous post.)
Again: 'Right on guys'...!!!
Again: 'Right on guys'...!!!
If the toxic jab ever becomes truly mandatory other ‘treatments’ will follow, and we’ll be taking all sorts of mandatory crap to pad big pharma’s pockets.
Biden sounds like he would like the jab to be mandatory. FJB!
I would go as far as to say that no medical intervention has ever eradicated any accute illness. Sure, they do a fine job treating the symptoms until a person can heal (if it doesn't kill them first), but clean hot water is the source of disease irradication wherever it's available.
Since Fauci came on board the NIH, in 1968, Americans went from 6% with chronic diseases to 54% by 2006. Fauci transformed the NIH into an incubator of pharmaceutical products.
People need to wake up to the fact that the pharmaceutical industry is not there to cure diseases. They are there to make money. We have more vaccines and medicines today than ever in human history, and consequently we have more diseases than ever.... so, the industry is not there to cure anyone but to make us sick and profit from our sickness. And that alone is a major human rights violation.
I read The True Anthony Facci by R.F.Kenneday Jr. It took me back to when I was a new nurse, taking care of AIDS patients. Faccui's drug cocktail was awful for AIDS patients. Because of this experience I don't trust anything Faccui recommends for treating anything.
'Right on guys'...!!!
I agree plus see thebigvirushoax dot com
Unicorn, yes! They’ve tried that with me as well, getting quite insistent!
According to some sources not connected to the pharmaceutical industry, statins lower cholesterol but do not decrease probability of heart disease. The only benefit is prettier numbers on a piece of paper. High cholesterol is a side effect of bad diet and lack of exercise, which frequently lead to heart disease. Lowering cholesterol by artificial means does nothing to address the actual cause of the heart disease, which is bad lifestyle choices, not cholesterol levels. There is a genetic component, but What we can actually control is more relevant.
I have embraced to be labeled anti vaxxer and wear it as the badge or honor. I ask hard questions that make provax feel uncomfortable. I didn't know asking questions can be seen as being subversive
Before this I would say I was vaccine hesitant. Now? Now I have zero trust in government, big pharma and our entire medical profession in Australia (they are not allowed to even discuss vaccine issues), plus reading what Robert F Kennedy Jr has been saying, they yes, now I am anti vaxxer even by the old definition.
Yes me too. I never questioned getting myself or my kids vaccinated. But now with the disgusting push of this experiment. I have lost all faith in all vaccines as the manufacturers and so called regulators are clearly not working in the people’s best interest. Ignoring so much negative data. It is a disgrace. And of course what then have they already done previously? Makes you wonder? As a I am seeing more of my friends relatively young get cancer something I don’t remember the generation before having so many under 50 getting? I have really started to question it all...
The more one learns about how the world actually works, the less one wants to work in such a deceptive, corrupted and gamed world. The -illionaires' cabals seem to have psychologized every interest to their advantage; everything on the table drips or bleeds down into their shimmering coffers. If it hasn't been rigged, the potential returns were obviously minuscule.
I have a niece that is a pharmacist in Australia. I don't ask her anything about medicine. I wouldn't want her license to be censored.
I have become a proud anti-vaxxer.
I found out a few years ago I AM an anti-vaxxer since I do not trust the gov't minions like Biden, et. al.
I heard term anti vaxxer long ago.
I ignored the term, as I had to hear from all sides.
Fast forward, spring 2020... Covid had many lies .. I became anti covid vax I knew was coming.
And I heard from anti vaxxers, and that Rockefeller set up vaccines...
I am fully anti vaxxer.
I wear t-shirt, Not Vaccinated
With Covid kill shot
I heard the term long ago and dismissed it. In 2016, out of curiosity, I watched the documentary Vaxxed and I was floored. I had no idea how many more vaccines had been added to the children's schedule and that Congress had given Pharma total immunity.
Congress has been completely co-opted by Big Pharma. I was never an anti-vaxxer in the strict sense of the word, but eventually concluded the flu vaccine was pretty worthless. And, once you discover how Congress has given Pharma total legal vaccine immunity among their other bad decisions, such as requiring so many childhood vaccinations and crippling VAERS, it makes you even more skeptical about trusting either Pharma or government.
I imagine anti vaxxers would be labeled "conspiracy theorists", maybe.
Me? I want to hear the evidence. I don't dismiss conspiracy theories out of hand, usually. I simply don't have energy to adjudicate all of them.
Presently, I adhere to 2 major conspiracy Facts...
Vatican was taken over in 1958 by enemies of Holy Mother Church...
And same groups are running massive depopulation scam, using cooped governments, mainstream health, mainstream media, mainstream educational..
In both cases, a brave minority fight against overwhelming odds... until God ends this chastisement
I saw 2 California doctors, Dr. ERickson and another brave one, give 2 talks with Q and A afterwards... logical, clear cut, questions that should have been answered by medical hierarchy....
It went viral, then suppressed.
As you say, you're not allowed to even ask questions.
I am not a scientist, but I know scientific method... reading scientific articles is fun to me.
I knew something terribly wrong.
I was HHS auditor... I believe FDA and CDC have received tremendous number of Audit findings on approval process
Edit... "WOULD have received..."
Bitchute.com and some others can avoid FB itself. No loss either.
I do the same. It’s an insult only to those who blindly swallow this totalitarian regime’s authority and Big Pharma’s agenda. As for myself, I have different standards. [Read: higher standards.]
Saul Alinsky, who knew how to fight these battles, said "Embrace the slur."
How about this? Injecting unknown ingredients into my own or my children's bodies with unknown side effects with uncontestable proof of (IN)EFFICACY, and agreeing to go back for more is called anti neuronal apoptosis.
Cell death and cogent thinking is now prolific. I believe we might surmise these epigenetic changes are a result of environmental poisons called the media which support a wayward and criminal government.
*absence of cogent thinking 🤷♀️☺️
Love it! "...anti neuronal apoptosis."
Nice...!!!
I have been an anti-vaxxer for at least 22 years. As a medical student giving high school sports physicals, I was told to then give vaccines. I said No, due to First Do No Harm. Admin was aghast, but could do nothing, because they still upheld the motto. Formaldehyde, aluminum hydroxide, sometimes thimerosal and sometimes active pathogens were in the old, less scary vaccines.
My definition of vaccination: A superstitious ritual involving a mildly poisonous stew that only serves to disrupt optimal immune function.
I have been a hard core anti-vaxxer myself for several years now. One of the best explanations of my reasons for that was in a video-taped presentation several years ago by the mother of a vaccine-injured child. The video and transcript are available at https://www.ageofautism.com/2018/11/why-is-this-legal-presentation-on-vaccines-by-laura-hayes.html. I would highly recommend watching/reading it for anyone who is currently sitting on the fence, or anyone who already an anti-vaxxer and needs some good talking points to share with family and friends.
In a while, 100% will be "anti-vaxxers. That's because everyone that got injected will be dead of heart attack, brain bleed, general organ failure, breakthrough infection, or some such. And to their last breath, the victims will blame either the anti-vaxxers or some newly-discovered alternate cause. The "safe and effective" injection cannot be blamed, ever!
They are already blaming climate change, and a made up condition called post pandemic stress syndrome, that oddly enough requires a cardiologist (instead of a psychologist) to treat. They should have called it covid-19 vaccine syndrome.
But...that would be closer to the truth. Can't have that now, can we?
Oh it’s the stress of this horrible pandemic that’s causing my heart problems. There is even a scientific article about it I read so it must be true. https://www.psychiatrist.com/jcp/covid-19/how-should-psychiatry-respond-to-covid-19-anti-vax-attitudes/
Preach!! I am anti-vaccine. I have been since they harmed my child. All of that poison, and those responsible for producing it and mandating it on the innocent, need to go straight into the bin.
I'm heart-broken to hear that M.E., God Bless you and yours dearest ones..!!! "...and/or straight to the lake of fire..." unless of course they repent and get Saved!
Fauci changed the definition of "Gain of function" after being caught lying about it.
Merriam-Webster playing games they can't win either.
This was my letter to BMJ Rapid Responses last year
https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3099/rr-5
Regarding the Use of the Term "Anti-Vaxxer"
Dear Editor
Thank you Karyse Day [1] for drawing attention to the problem of the bias and intimidation inherent in the term "anti-vaxxer". The term has been around perhaps since the 19th century but has evolved a new context. Three years ago I drew attention to the remarks of Seth Berkley, director of the vaccine lobby organisation GAVI, in the Spectator proposing that "anti-vaxxers" be excluded from social media, which meant in effect not only that certain people should not be allowed on social media but that criticism of vaccines should not be allowed on a generic basis - an extremely serious matter[2].
Unfortunately, this has also been a hobby-horse of the present Prime Minister. In August last year Reuter's recorded Boris Johnson as saying [3]:
“I’m afraid people have just been listening to that superstitious mumbo-jumbo on the internet, all that anti-vax stuff..."
On 24 September 2020 he told the UN [4]:
“There are today people who are still actually anti-science, a whole movement called ‘the anti-vaxxers’ who refuse to acknowledge the evidence that vaccinations have eradicated smallpox and who by their prejudices are actually endangering the very children they want to protect."
By February this year the Sunday Telegraph was reporting [5]:
"Posting anti-vaccine propaganda on social media could become criminal offence, Law Commissioner says
New Law Commissioner Penney Lewis is leading wide-ranging review into whether UK's offence and abuse laws are fit for the Social Media age..."
And once again the Prime Minister was quoted last month [6]:
“There’s all these anti-vaxxers now,” Johnson told medical workers at a doctor’s surgery in London. “They are nuts, they are nuts.”
While there are a lot of very fed up people I am extremely dubious there is a movement called "the anti-vaxxers" or that they are posting propaganda: at the very best this is a simplistic claim [7,8]. At a time when the government is supposedly trying to earn trust for a range of potential SAR-CoV-2 vaccines the continued disparagement and repression of people who raise questions about a class of products - which after all cannot be inherently safe - speaks for itself. It creates an atmosphere of prejudice and intimidation - such as described in the Cumberlege review [9] and should be seen and understood for what it is.
[1] Karyse Day, 'Re: Cumberlege review exposes stubborn and dangerous flaws in healthcare', 25 August 2020, https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3099/rr-3
[2] John Stone, ' The Shadow War on Disease: Arbitrary, Oppressive and Unaccountable Medicine', 9 July 2017, https://www.bmj.com/content/357/bmj.j2449/rr-13
[3] 'UK's Johnson slams 'mumbo-jumbo' about vaccines after measles rates rise', Reuter's 19 August 2020, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-health/uks-johnson-slams-mumb...
[4] United Kingdom - Prime Minister Addresses General Debate, 74th Session (UN 24 September 2019) @ 8.30 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zf4YEyh7erE&app=desktop
[5] Mike Wright, 'Posting anti-vaccine propaganda on social media could become criminal offence, Law Commissioner says', 1 February 2020, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/02/01/posting-anti-vaccine-propaga...
[6] 'Johnson says anti-vaxxers 'are nuts'', Reuter's 24 July 2020, https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-health-coronavirus-britain-vaccinatio-...
[7] John Stone, 'An appeal to authority is not the same as an appeal to knowledge', 15 May 2019, https://www.bmj.com/content/365/bmj.l2144/rr-0
[8] John Stone, 'Brave new World', 17 May 2019, https://www.bmj.com/content/365/bmj.l2144/rr-5
[9] Helen Haskell, 'Cumberlege review exposes stubborn and dangerous flaws in healthcare'
BMJ 2020; 370 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3099 (Published 06 August 2020)
27 August 2020
John Stone
UK Editor
AgeofAutism.com
London N22
@JohnStone32
I find it astonishing that the side that promotes independence and personal autonomy (the “anti-vaxers”) is accused of pushing “propaganda”. I thought propaganda could only be pushed by those with power?
The “anti-vax” side doesn’t seek to coerce or condemn. Instead, we seek to inform/provide an alternative explanation and to WARN. Since when has warning people (without force, mind you) become a crime?
The government’s actions don’t surprise me; how many are falling for it does.
I'm for vaccines that are based on long-term studies and provide immunity from disease, not fake ones like the Covid one that is so ineffective that the very definition of "vaccine" had to be changed to accommodate it.
Every vaccine is a Russian roulette bullet waiting to happen. The only difference between the standard vaccines and COVID-19 ones however is that they have the whole barrel loaded.
cylinder is more apt
Exactly. Well said
Please name one vaccine that has provided immunity from disease that is superior to naturally acquired immunity. Vaccines compromise natural immunity by artificial means. The only benefits from vaccines are received by the manufacturers, who are exempt from the trail of death and destruction they leave behind. Congress has taken away their incentive to make them safe by protecting the manufacturers from liability no matter how much damage they cause. Why should they waste their money on safety studies? If you read the package inserts you will not find a single vaccine that does not come with the risk of serious side effects.
A vaccine is inherently untrustworthy because it is purportedly “preventative” — in comparison to medications which you can see first hand work because your disease went away. You can’t see if the vaccine worked, firsthand, in yourself, because the default protocol is to expect adverse side-effects, even in a real vaccine. And you never had the disease in the first place, as the vaccine is preventative; so you can’t see the disease heal in yourself firsthand. Some vaccines work. However, many more are shots that abuse this loophole — because in essence Big Pharma can put anything they want in it, and chalk it up to “normal adverse side-effects,” and “not being full-proof preventative.” Vaccines are real, abuse of pseudo-vaccines is much more real.
OK, you won. That comment made my head hurt more than any other comment. Congratulations.
Glad I won, thank you
Fwiw, I understood what you said. 👍🏼
I don’t think it’s vaccines that are being objected to as much as the mandates. At least, it’s the mandates *I* object to. (Hell, I don’t think ANY substance should be illegal…or mandatory.)
Sorry, it keeps double posting then deleting one of them deletes both. I give up. It was a good comment though
I couldn’t find your other comment, but I call myself the “world’s worst LDS” because it’s true.
I converted 24 years ago, and I’ve been active on and off. I like the doctrine fine, but I lack the “dogmatic” gene, and the church culture is pretty damned dogmatic (and, frankly, kind of weird).
I am also incredibly disappointed in the leadership, who instructed all members to get the vax. I’m not okay with that—members should have been counseled to educate themselves and to speak to a trusted medical provider, not blindly accept brand new technology.
Love your comments!
Thank you. I thought it was funny because I had some childhood experience with the church. Somewhat traumatizing, but I recovered lol. Like you said, "kind of weird". Refreshing to hear a mormon swear though! You earned the title!
Omg, I’m worse than just swearing Mormon. Much, much worse. (A “normal” person would think I’m fine, if a little “edgy”, but I don’t fit in with the vast majority of the other ward ladies who are my age or younger. 🤷🏼♀️😏)
I got my Endowments and was sealed to my husband a year after I joined the church, in 1998. Our son was 13 mos old when he was sealed to us (same day I was Endowed and we were sealed). We raised our son in the church when he was little. He liked Primary and the camp outs.
When our son was about 10, my husband (the reason I converted) got a rare form of viral encephalitis that injured him permanently. He’s been housebound at best, and bed-bound at worst with post-viral chronic fatigue syndrome (and some other chronic issues that are permanent) for well over a decade. I’ll spare you the details.
It wasn’t long before I had to drag our son to church: all of his church friends moved (we’re in So Cal and everyone went to Utah, natch.) and he was stuck with the Young Men’s class below his, since no one was his age. My son wasn’t into sports, eating, being in a band; instead, he played video games and wrote satire. He refused Scouting, the Trek, a mission (😄), Seminary, and any Sunday meeting where Scouts or missions were discussed (he’d go read scripture in the hall). They ALL thought he was weird. (Like, THIS weird: https://youtu.be/7WABqc2cOII) 🤣
I stopped making him go pretty quickly. But I kept going another seven years or so, and liked the old ladies from Relief Society. When our ward merged with another, I said adiós. I stayed in touch with a very few, and all old.
Interestingly, we all still tithe—even our son, who turned out to be gay (shocker)—(I would give away 10+% of my gross income, regardless), but we’re so bad that we refuse to answer the door or the phone for the missionaries.
Oh, and since my husband uses THC to treat his dystonia (he has that, too), well, so do I. That’s not very Mormonly of me.
See, I AM the WORST LDS…ever. Anyone would agree. 👍🏼😉
I believed you. Sorry about your husband. I normally don't judge people but you seem like a good person. Nothing wrong with a little T now and then to maintain sanity in this global asylum being run by criminal psychopaths
what vaccines are you for
BTW, I heard a better term than "anti-vaxxer" today. From now on, I will be referring to myself as "vaccine-free."
Pure blood. Many on YT use this one.
Yeah this is my fave. It sounds fittingly virtuous. We purebloods are the only ones who can safely donate blood and organs. Our plasma can and does cure the sick. We should be selling this message. We should meet every use of the term 'anti-vaxxer' with "pure blood" and these facts. It will collapse the 'anti-vaxxer' narrative overnight. People want to be on the side that's winning, but people suffer from FOMO too. Who would want to be 'vaccinated' when they coul be 'pure blood', eternal source of healthy blood, capable of curing the sick!!! Its a better virtue signal, and if progressives love anything it's proclaiming themselves the most virtuous. They won't be able to resist the allure of being pure of blood, source of health. Even they know deep down the vaccine story is flimsy. Let's take back the narrative. Make it your mission to declare yourself proudly as the virtuous pureblood you are to everyone who will listen. Own it! Make them tremble in shame in the face of your purity. Your posturing will defeat theirs easily. Reclaim your destiny Purebloods!
🤗 Thank-you for that resounding pep talk! It is also, my favorite, and though, I knew all the things you mentioned, I had not "done the math" and put it all together. To me it was just the truth.....and, well, you know, Harry Potter. 😉
And for me, VCS - Vaccine Control Subject (and member of Vax Can't Save breakfast club).
I am admitting, I was so naive about everything until COVID. Something wasn’t right but I couldn’t explain it. Everything was still unicorns and skittles for me. It took the lockdowns, the mask mandates, the suppression of early treatments and even the mention of them, public officials admittedly withholding and changing information, and the absolute fear everyone (including me) constantly felt. The censorship and the total denial of the vaccine injured was it. It took a long time, plus I wasn’t willing to think people could really put money/power/whatever over someone else’s life. Ignorance, I thought, was bliss. But now I know. And honestly, not being ignorant is very blissful. It’s truth. It gives me strength and more courage than I knew I had. I’ll never go back, I won’t ever be vaccinated with these covid shots, and I’ll stand aside all of you who also know and are so brave to speak up. But I’m keeping the skittles!
love it!! It is a very hard concept to wrap your brain around!! They ARE putting power/money above lives!! They could care less!! The entire system has been captured including most of congress. They make a lot of decisions based on special interest and not us. It all needs to be gutted and rebuilt. We can't even tryst the FDA anymore. It's hard to forsee how we can successfully move forward this way. There are zero checks and balances currently and that's not good for anyone!
CDC has never been good for real information since they ignore nutrients!!!!
In the U.K. a hugely popular morning TV show ran a poll asking if vaccinations should be mandatory. After 45,000 replies, where 89% said no, the poll was dropped and never mentioned again. We are not just fighting govt, but also the bought and paid for MSM
I will gladly wear that "badge of honor". As a Canadian I am sadly in the minority. A recent Angus Reid poll in Canada said 70% of Canadians favor firing people in medical professions, paramedics, firefighters,teachers,air line personnel and police officers. Poll based on 1000 people. We're screwed.
Polls are often used to publish a narrative and are not true polls. Rasmussen reports is the most accurate pollsters now, the others are garbage (Pew might have some legitimacy still but that remains to be seen.)
I agree entirely about what you said about polls. I have rarely believed in polls but unfortunately a lot of people do. People are so easy to manipulate and polls are another tool in the narrative to sway people.
I can't help but wonder if people moving away from use of land lines, using do not call registry, and using call screening have had an effect on accuracy of polls these days. They seems to always be wrong. Er perhaps they always were for propaganda and I just never noticed...
My daughter's cell phone goes to mail immediately.
I think there may be a message.
I usually just use email instead.
Good point. Pollsters using the phone to poll people will only get through to people who don’t know how to manipulate their smartphone to block calls from unknown numbers.
More accurate is “We polled 1000 tech-illiterate people, and 70% of them are in favor of mandatory vaccines.” Geh. 🤦♀️
God bless brave Canadians. Beware polls...
I know. I think the majority of people that believe in polls also believe most of mainstream news. Critical thinking is not their forte.