The fact is, not a single routine injected childhood vaccine on the CDC schedule was licensed based on a placebo-controlled trial, nor was any vaccine used as a control to license any such vaccine.
WOW! Thank you for ALL of this research and important intel. As a mother in the 80s I weep inside today knowing that my beautiful little daughter had all of these disastrous shots, whereas, I was duped by the ‘physicians’ at the time. I apologize to her in my prayers of forgiveness every day. Aaron, you ARE A PRICELESS GEM in a world of dark energy. Please keep shining the inner light that the Lord has given you…we all need it to see through these dark times. May God BLESS you🙏.
I was so impressed by your knowledge versus the Stanford doctor’s knowledge.
My child didn’t not have all these shots in the 80’s.
At a Wellness visit, the doctor asked me if it was OK to go ahead and give my baby two doses because I was a little in between…late for the first one and early for the next series.
I asked my Doctor if he, the expert, thought it would be okay. He had no problem. Safe and effective! One series in one leg and the second series in his little perfect leg.
It makes me wonder what my child would be like without shots! He is fine.
The facts are out. Covid woke me up. All the banned Docs and researchers, reputations trashed, jobs lost because of mandates, and blue and red state policies. Ugh! Tylenol being taken by pregnant women on video after Trump’s announcement!
Most children get sick and recover if they are healthy. Vaccine injuries are permanent. Take care, Ryan. No need to respond to me because you are not going to change my mind. I hear drugstores in your area are offering Covid boosters…oops! The shoots were stopped because they were not safe and effective!
I too deeply regret ever “vaccinating” my kids! Sadly my daughter lives with the irreversible damage these have caused her, but she’s alive and she knows the damage they do. God Bless you and your family!
“What is the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP)?
Every year, the U.S. government pays hundreds of millions of dollars to people who were injured by vaccines. It’s all part of a tax-funded program called the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. Since 1988, $4.2 billion has been paid to over 7,000 people who were injured by severe vaccine side effects.”
Please open your mind to new information. Vaccine injuries may be mild to severe and take awhile to discover. (More than the 4 years window to file a claim)
Ryan, did you vaccinate your family without any effects? Great news to hear for those that are not affected ! If your child was injured, you just think a different way! Thank you for sharing your opinions. I did my research and you did yours.
It's good that the 1 in a million kids who have serious adverse events are compensated. That's what we want. that said, your lifetime chance of DEATH from lightning strike is 1 in 20,000. that is 50 times lower than your chance of being INJURED by vaccines. https://www.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/hrsa/vicp/vicp-stats-04-01-26.pdf
Look at the things that are 1 in a million chance. Those are the things that are as likely as being injured by a vaccine dose.
95% of vaccine adverse effects happen in the first 2 weeks. None has ever been shown to start more than 6 months after administration.
I did vaccinate my family with no ill effects. the kids participated in a trial for an EBV vaccine and I've taken mRNA flu vaccines as part of a study.
Even if my kids were both injured I'd still be here advocating for vaccines. 1 in a million chance of an injury is much better than the 1 in a 1000 chance of dying after you get measles.
Question everything you like, but do it in the context of the facts.
I will almost guarantee you that whatever injury you think your kid got that it's not a thing that vaccines increase the risk of in the population so saying they cause it is pretty absurd.
This is truly scary. The agencies that are supposed to protect children and adults, not only failed to do so, but filled pockets to poison and keep on poisoning. Knowing they were killing people. All those that participated in this fraud should be judged as murderers.
Lots of cult food here. I'm sure Siri's kids receive most AAP-recommended vaccines.
Is there any vaccine that's been adequately evaluated pre-licensure? Do post-marketing trials and 30 or 40 years pharmacovigilance data ever contribute anything useful to a product's safety profile?
You object to excipient only comparator arms, because they're not "placebo" arms. You would object to non-blinding if saline (placebo) were substituted for these inactives. Then, you would object to saline, because it's not just sterile water.
Pot, meet kettle. Maybe you might want to choose a different characterization than “cult?” Cults are universally known for their strict codes of conduct for their adherents or, as we might say, their MANDATES of behavior. Now, which camp is all about MANDATES?
Not true - At best, a gross oversimplification. Which makes sense, considering this venue.
Raëlism, NXIVM, Scientology (For rank-and-file members, there is no “code of conduct” governing everyday life), The Family International, and others ...
Now go read and study those trials and see how well they were done and how good the outcomes were. Studies are not always good, and pointing them out doesn't make Aaron Siri look bad. Question: Do you know how to read a study to see if it's vigorous?
Line most Sirians, you have a profile showing you're a gullible, conspiracy-addled mark for cracks and predators - or one of their social media campaigners;
Maybe not, but he has represented parents of vaccine damaged kids. So, if all these injections are safe and effective, why then do pHarma need immunity from prosecution? Isn't it odd, too, that since immunity given in 1986 (due to pHarma getting sued to bankcruptcy), the number of injections went up, some for "new" diseases that all of a sudden were "discovered" and required a vaccine? I'm over 70 yrs old, had the few that were available then. We knew no-one with food allergies, auto immune probs, or anyone with neuro diverse problems such as ADHD, or worse, autism (brain damage, yes, that's what it is)! We don't need safer vaccines, we don't actually need any as long as fed and watered properly, enough sunshine and sleep!
From something that was quite rare to becoming 1/30, on various spectrum levels, is quite shocking, and this increase started to happen after 1986. Same with dementias in elderly, people generally accepting of a parent diagnosed as almost normal thing once they reach retirement. Why is this, then? Maybe because of the pretty useless flu jab they are encouraged to take annually. See Dr Chris Exley's substack on aluminium in brains, or, Trust the Evidence substack on the F word, showing how at least 8 respiritory diseases are counted as "flu cases" to inflate numbers so to scare people into an injection, when, in fact, true flu numbers are very, very low. You forget, pharma is a business, they were going under because of all the claims against them prior to 1986, so after, they were protected and helped them to suck up more taxpayers money with more vaccines. If you didn't know, mRNA was a failed gene therapy cancer injection, loads $$ spent trying for a new "blockbuster" which pharma needed because their patents on lucrative drugs all shortly to expire. It got rebranded as a vaccine instead, with help from friends who invented a new illness, changed the definition of both words "pandemic" and "vaccine" and rushed out all these jabs without testing for toxicity, cancer causing, or problems for pregnant women or their babies. We won't know for years about their fertility but already know of problems with fertility, more cancers, autoimmune, heart, neuro, etc. now. First, do no harm, is the motto.
We sure do get a lot of MDs who masquerade in the comments. How about revealing your credentials so that we know that you are actually accredited as a doctor and not just some random bot pushing propaganda on the internet.
Is JasonLT an MD masquerading as a sane person? Or is he masquerading as an MD?
You can have my office number 🧦, right after Siri's deposition in which he answers questions about which routine childhood vaccinations his kids received.
Or just DM me your phone number. I'll phone you from my office by 17:00 EST.
This is apparent. But he shows off for this crew by clipping 3 or 4 out-of-context minutes from a 9-hour adversarial deposition of an 85 year old man. His mother would be proud (if he ever had one).
The fact that he claims active placebos aren't real placebos tells everyone with any knowledge all they need to know about Aaron's deep well of ignorance.
Serously? A placebo, by definition, should not be active. It should be neutral. I think the well of ignorance is somewhere else. But then, you've just confirmed what I'd suspected.
Why not? What if you're worried that the adjuvant causing inflammation might make the vaccine look more effective than it really is? It should be neutral as to the outcome you're testing, but it shouldn't be neutral in any other way
None of those are RCTs used for licensing the vaccine. They do not refute his claim.
- JAMA Network: retrospective study, not a trial
- Science Direct: case-control study based on self-reported/recorded reports
- PubMed 31865602: meta-analysis of other studies, claims three trials included pregnant women but provides no specifics (possibly Zaman et al. (2008) - Bangladesh, Madhi et al. (2014) - South Africa, and Tapia et al. (2016) - Mali) and the quality of those studies is questionable
- NIH PMC6605784: retrospective review, not a trial
- PubMed 32402751: retrospective study, not a trial
- PubMed 34878959: retrospective study, not a trial, largely the same group as 32402751. Additionally, Helena C. Maltezou is the primary author and has previously disclosed funding from both Novartis and GSK despite stating no conflict of interest.
Aaron Siri's previous statement that you paraphrase is:
"We FOIA’ed the FDA with a simple request: Provide all the clinical trials relied upon to license the flu shot for pregnant women. They finally admitted we don’t have any clinical trials because it’s never been licensed for pregnant women."
This is correct. No trials used for licensure specifically tested on pregnant women, and the package insert itself does not list pregnancy as an approve indication. That said, the FDA also did not require this testing as a condition of licensing like they probably should have.
It's not too much to ask. It's absurdly unethical, ruinously expensive and unlikely to change anyone's mind. The current safety data about vaccines is incredibly good. There's no reason to think that people who are ignorant of the current state of the data would change their minds after one more study shows vaccines to be safe. There's no need to run a billion dollar unethical study that wouldn't convince anyone anyway. What is your perspective on this?
Does it concern you that the carcinogenicity, effect on fertility, and mutogenicity have not be tested on the vaccines? Some have answers on fertility, but, often, are only for men or women, not both.
Please, look inside the inserts at Section 13. For me, that alone is deeply concerning, unethical. Where are the common sense studies and/or follow up for these very real concerns?
And that's the point. To study cancer you need years. We didn't have years and there was no good mechanism for causing cancer. Now we know it's not cancer causing. Similar to fertility. They got approved before we knew there was no effect on fertility. And now we know.
So no. I'm not worried about those things. They're far from unethical. Why are you worried? .
Why is an RCT with saline placebo the right study design?
-----
Ethics:
1) Using heavy metals as a "placebo" violates the medical ethic of "first do no harm"
2) Telling people heavy metals are a placebo violates the medical ethic of "informed consent"
3) Lying is unethical.
Science:
1) According to the "medical experts" Randomized placebo studies are the gold standard, the highest quality studies.
2) Likewise, according to them they are the only studies capable of determining causality.
Let's go back to the first study.
This study was paid for by the CDC. The authors of it were paid by Moderna, GlaxoSmithKline, Dynavax Hillivax Johnson & Johnson, CSL Seqirus...
This study had nearly double the background rate of life threatening events such as low birth weight and premature birth. 22% of births had these adverse events.
Who is using heavy metals as a placebo? How large would a vaccine RCT have to be to get to statistical significance on an AE that happens once in 100,000 doses? What if that AE is 1/100k in one demographic but doesn't happen at all in another one? How would you set up an RCT that big?
In this study in the supplementary data figure 11 what were the only statistical significant results regarding aluminum based vaccines and autism? (Hint the authors used the opposed format and a -4.49 "autistic disorder" would mean a 4.49 increased rate of autism for aluminum based vaccines).
Wow more lies from Aaron Siri. Quick 5 minute PubMed search shows a ton of vaccine trials with placebo that Aaron Siri pretends dont exist. Also he plays games by saying "routine" vaccines which he says rules out COVID vaccines which has DOZENS of saline placebo trials that he again tries to ignore:
He categorizes excipient only comparators as "not placebo." From my comment above;
You object to excipient-only comparator arms, because they're not "placebo" arms. You would object to non-blinding if saline (placebo) were substituted for these inactives. Then, you would object to saline, because it's not just sterile water.
But use of saline only would immediately unblind. So the trial wouldn't be "randomized, double-blind." Which would invite great criticism. What inactive comparators would be acceptable? In what situations?
The real problem is that adjuvants (or comparator vaccines) cause inflammation and immune activation that could be confused for effectiveness of the actual vaccine. If what you care about is "how effective is the antigen at causing immunity" then it makes perfect sense to make the comparison arm the adjuvant or a similar unrelated vaccine
Literally the argument for refusing to use a real placebo is that vaccines cause so many adverse events that everyone will know who received the vaccine because they will be harmed.
In what way are they not appropriate placebos? Are you claiming that we don't know the safety of those comparators? Or that they present a misleading comparison? What are you trying to account for in claiming that the only appropriate placebo is sterile saline?
They are lies! You cannot believe what the gov’t tells us. There are no placebo controlled studies on any childhood mandated vaccine. Gov’t gets much of their funding from big pharma. They rely on these payoffs. Huge conflict of interest.
No one is more conflicted than tort lawyers Siri and Bobby, who exist to enrich themselves suing big companies and selling books, subscriptions, podcasts and distortions to their believers.
Trump's billionaire Cabinet, many of whom lobbied for and/or ran oil and gas companies, hedge funds, massive corporations and dark money PACs - no conflicts there.
Bobby's supplement-selling, health AI company owning deputies - no conflicts there.
This info is horrifying, I’m happy the truth is emerging. Covid helped that. After Pfizer C-jabs murdered my sweet husband I became fully aware of the poison in those jabs and did research on them and others. The truth is we’ve been lied to for many generations about vaccine safety. They are not safe or effective and never proven to be either. The lies are over many generations and our unhealthy children are the proof. Parents, open up your eyes, look around at all the health issues our kids have. Then look at kids health that are un-vaxed. Then you’ll know you’ve been scammed. Protect your children because they won’t!
It’s a long story but I’ll briefly fill you in since you’re interested. Pfizer replaced their promoter in their C-jab with the SV40 virus which they kept from the FDA to get EUA approval. A promoter is designed to remove DNA which the original promoter did very well but it took a long time. So by replacing it for expedience they kept the info secret that the SV40 virus didn’t do the same job and left an abundance of DNA in the ingredients. Anyone with gene mutations (my husband had 3) should have been told not to take the pfuzer jabs which were gene therapy, not vaccines. It destroyed his immune system. Hence two (as they now call them) turbo cancers murdered him in just 10 days after diagnosis. Pfizer also kept many other truths from the FDA, but I believe I answered your question in the short version explanation. That’s the truth!
Your "explanation" was babble mixed with a few factoids.
SV40 is not a whole virus. It cannot replicate. It's a common lab sequence used for decades in molecular biology.
A promoter does not remove DNA. It's a control sequence that initiates transcription.
DNA removal in manufacturing is handled by purification steps (enzymes, filtration, chromatography), not by promoters.
The idea that Pfizer “replaced a promoter to remove DNA faster” is NOT HOW BIOLOGY WORKS.
Pfizer didn't “kept this from the FDA” to obtain Emergency Use Authorization. The manufacturing process, including plasmid design elements, was reviewed by regulators. Differences between early clinical batches and scaled-up production batches are normal documented
My question is: when will a safe and effective vaccine be developed to protect the weak and vulnerable minds of captured media from falling victim to the sickness of virLIEogy and germaphobia? A “one & done” injection sure would be nice! Lacking that, I reckon multiple doses of “Injecting Freedom”will have to do. If only they would take their needed medicine! I wonder why we don’t witness them celebrating their freedom to decide for themselves? Maybe that question needs to be put to them more directly!
Yes Ryan! It is good of you to raise such points as you do here. I celebrate your freedom to decide for yourself. I hope that you are happy to extend that same freedom for others to decide for themselves too. For it is the lacking of societal support for that freedom over the last decade and more that has contributed to the rise to outfits like the one we are commenting on here.
I find it good that as a society we are being brought by these circumstances to look more deeply at the foundations by which we discern the value of the information that comes our way. Isn’t this consideration what has driven all of scientific, religious, and philosophical inquiry? And doesn’t such inquiry rightfully belong to each and every one of us?
And so l heartily cheer your own quest for answers onward. I hope you will indulge me in sharing just one source that I have found to be useful in my own quest. I would feel honored if you find it useful too. It is this link: 🔗
I hope the link works. It is my first attempt at posting one in my comment.
It’s absolutely shocking (but not) how little doctors and pharmacists are taught about vaccines.
And how tragic (but not accidental) that parents simply trust the person in the white coat…
And what an extraordinary business model: create chronic disease and then sell the drugs to suppress their symptoms!
I doubt there has been a larger tragedy than mass vaccination on this planet: brain damage, autoimmune disease, chronic disease, cancer, heart disease.
And all that is found, of course, first in a colicky infant (who may now have difficulty bonding with mom) with gastrointestinal distress due to vaccine destroyed gut biome.
God help those parents who do not research what they inject into their children.
Well, medication‘s can suppress symptoms like mucus production, pain and fever— of course never dealing with the root cause, but suppressing those symptoms
He really touched a nerve with this one. These comments are full of an unusually high amount of vitriol from what I can only assume must be paid actors.
Thank you! I will share far and wide. ps just about to start reading your book. Thank you for that too. And you podcast. And your work in the court room.
I can get to this comment thread by clicking the heart or message button in my email.
Yet if I try to reach the article via the URL I get the following error until I have visited it via the redirect sequence since restarting my browser. The machinery does not want to serve your pages to me (perhaps others) unless I approach them with a tracking link first.
I appreciate the visitor data is determined from the redirect link that is used to reach your site IN PART but I still do not agree that I need to use it to reach your information. I feel that the large corporate big data systems can gain much more dangerous data about out networks than we can gain about our followers.
If you want to investigate the effect have a look to see if the raw URL can be reached from a computer or phone that has not visited your substack previously. It would be kind of underhanded if they prevented the spread without tracking the spread.
CHOP is one of the prominent pediatric healthcare facilities in the country (and world). The American Academy of Pediatrics is THE professional society for pediatric physicians in the US, 100 years old.
Siri is a goniff ambulance chaser that went to Yeshiva University and clerked for courts in Israel. Where did he grow up and attend primary school? No one seems to know.
RFK Jr. spent 15 years, from adolescence on, as a junky with a trust fund and powerful relatives. His entire extended family has denounced him as a predator.
You know fact checkers are useless, I spent years researching so don’t give me that bunk! Any sympathy would have been appreciated. But I guess not! Don’t bull me, you’re alive, he’s not! Yeah I’m pissed off. How dare you!
How dare I what? Of course I know that fact checkers are useless. What I wondered is what, if anything, the fact checkers that sent him those studies that weren't studies. Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and American Academy of Pediatrics. Did you even read Aaron's article? This was right at the beginning. and who isn't alive? What in the world are you on about?
"That is because the reality is that not a single routine injected childhood vaccine on the CDC schedule was licensed based on a placebo-controlled trial."
Unfortunately, these days it is necessary to diagram every sentence, evaluate the meaning of what "is" is etc. In the case of the above quote, is it possible that while the licensing decision was not based on a placebo-controlled trial, there were in fact, placebo-controlled trial(s), but they were not used to obtain the license?
Surely Big-Pharma will seize on such distinction to discredit critics.
Do you really think if Pharma had used true placebos they wouldn't use those studies rather than the damning ones? Unless, of course, the outcomes were so bad that they didn't dare.
First of all, if the rate of harm is high, then the vaccine would never be released. The harm would be seen beforehand. Second, post approval monitoring has been a failure. Once something is on the schedule, anything linked to the vaccine becomes "coincidence". Both Pharma and the so-called watchdog agencies are reluctant to admit an error--Pharma because it is profit driven and not health driven, and federal "watchdog" agencies because if they admit an error, then the federal government becomes liable for harm.
WOW! Thank you for ALL of this research and important intel. As a mother in the 80s I weep inside today knowing that my beautiful little daughter had all of these disastrous shots, whereas, I was duped by the ‘physicians’ at the time. I apologize to her in my prayers of forgiveness every day. Aaron, you ARE A PRICELESS GEM in a world of dark energy. Please keep shining the inner light that the Lord has given you…we all need it to see through these dark times. May God BLESS you🙏.
Thank you Mr. Siri.
I was so impressed by your knowledge versus the Stanford doctor’s knowledge.
My child didn’t not have all these shots in the 80’s.
At a Wellness visit, the doctor asked me if it was OK to go ahead and give my baby two doses because I was a little in between…late for the first one and early for the next series.
I asked my Doctor if he, the expert, thought it would be okay. He had no problem. Safe and effective! One series in one leg and the second series in his little perfect leg.
It makes me wonder what my child would be like without shots! He is fine.
The facts are out. Covid woke me up. All the banned Docs and researchers, reputations trashed, jobs lost because of mandates, and blue and red state policies. Ugh! Tylenol being taken by pregnant women on video after Trump’s announcement!
Please keep up the fight.
What your child likely would have been without shots is sick with vaccine preventable diseases.
Most children get sick and recover if they are healthy. Vaccine injuries are permanent. Take care, Ryan. No need to respond to me because you are not going to change my mind. I hear drugstores in your area are offering Covid boosters…oops! The shoots were stopped because they were not safe and effective!
measles kills 1-3 out of every thousand kids that get it.
What vaccine injuries are permanent?
I got my covid vaccine this year. They haven't been stopped.
I too deeply regret ever “vaccinating” my kids! Sadly my daughter lives with the irreversible damage these have caused her, but she’s alive and she knows the damage they do. God Bless you and your family!
I know kids can be annoying, but regretting giving them the best chance to live is a pretty reprehensible position!
Shooting them up with toxic, experimental, unsafe, untested, toxins because of lies and ignorance is the most reprehensible position!
Who's doing that? That sounds bad. Maybe don't do that.
Giving kids well studied and safe and effective vaccines, on the other hand, is great!
https://immunizationinfo.com/national-vaccine-injury-compensation-program/
“What is the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP)?
Every year, the U.S. government pays hundreds of millions of dollars to people who were injured by vaccines. It’s all part of a tax-funded program called the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. Since 1988, $4.2 billion has been paid to over 7,000 people who were injured by severe vaccine side effects.”
Please open your mind to new information. Vaccine injuries may be mild to severe and take awhile to discover. (More than the 4 years window to file a claim)
Ryan, did you vaccinate your family without any effects? Great news to hear for those that are not affected ! If your child was injured, you just think a different way! Thank you for sharing your opinions. I did my research and you did yours.
What is wrong with questioning ideas and data?
It's good that the 1 in a million kids who have serious adverse events are compensated. That's what we want. that said, your lifetime chance of DEATH from lightning strike is 1 in 20,000. that is 50 times lower than your chance of being INJURED by vaccines. https://www.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/hrsa/vicp/vicp-stats-04-01-26.pdf
https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~aldous/Real-World/million.html
Look at the things that are 1 in a million chance. Those are the things that are as likely as being injured by a vaccine dose.
95% of vaccine adverse effects happen in the first 2 weeks. None has ever been shown to start more than 6 months after administration.
I did vaccinate my family with no ill effects. the kids participated in a trial for an EBV vaccine and I've taken mRNA flu vaccines as part of a study.
Even if my kids were both injured I'd still be here advocating for vaccines. 1 in a million chance of an injury is much better than the 1 in a 1000 chance of dying after you get measles.
Question everything you like, but do it in the context of the facts.
I will almost guarantee you that whatever injury you think your kid got that it's not a thing that vaccines increase the risk of in the population so saying they cause it is pretty absurd.
which would they be exactly?
The entire childhood vaccination schedule and a handful more if you're traveling or worried about weaponized diseases.
I am sorry to hear your daughter was affected.
if people read this with an open mind, they would be shocked. Thank you!
Not if they have ANY knowledge of science and the way to do clinical trials.
Many people suffer from cognitive dissonance.
If people (you know who I am referring to) had a mind that would be a shock.
This is truly scary. The agencies that are supposed to protect children and adults, not only failed to do so, but filled pockets to poison and keep on poisoning. Knowing they were killing people. All those that participated in this fraud should be judged as murderers.
Lots of cult food here. I'm sure Siri's kids receive most AAP-recommended vaccines.
Is there any vaccine that's been adequately evaluated pre-licensure? Do post-marketing trials and 30 or 40 years pharmacovigilance data ever contribute anything useful to a product's safety profile?
You object to excipient only comparator arms, because they're not "placebo" arms. You would object to non-blinding if saline (placebo) were substituted for these inactives. Then, you would object to saline, because it's not just sterile water.
Pot, meet kettle. Maybe you might want to choose a different characterization than “cult?” Cults are universally known for their strict codes of conduct for their adherents or, as we might say, their MANDATES of behavior. Now, which camp is all about MANDATES?
Not true - At best, a gross oversimplification. Which makes sense, considering this venue.
Raëlism, NXIVM, Scientology (For rank-and-file members, there is no “code of conduct” governing everyday life), The Family International, and others ...
Aaron Siri also lied previously when he said "zero flu vaccine trials have been done on pregnant women."
Making you look foolish becomes easier every single day:
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2823749
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X25005948#bb0035
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6605784/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31865602/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32402751/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34878959/
Now go read and study those trials and see how well they were done and how good the outcomes were. Studies are not always good, and pointing them out doesn't make Aaron Siri look bad. Question: Do you know how to read a study to see if it's vigorous?
I have an MD/PhD and the PhD is in statistics, so yes I know how to read papers.
Meanwhile Aaron Siri has ZERO medical and ZERO scientific training but you guys just lap up whatever he says like he's some kind of "expert"
You have zero likes and zero activity JasonLT in Substack. Hmmm.
Bot paid to shill... on we go...
Line most Sirians, you have a profile showing you're a gullible, conspiracy-addled mark for cracks and predators - or one of their social media campaigners;
https://substack.com/@commoncents2/likes
An interesting flex coming from someone who calls themself a "Russian Nazi".
Thank you, My best work was covid and the clot shots.
No clots from mRNA vaccines
His groupies really are the dimmest (though many are just astroturf accounts).
Do you have the studies that back up your claim? Or is that just your assertion based on the voices in your head.
Maybe not, but he has represented parents of vaccine damaged kids. So, if all these injections are safe and effective, why then do pHarma need immunity from prosecution? Isn't it odd, too, that since immunity given in 1986 (due to pHarma getting sued to bankcruptcy), the number of injections went up, some for "new" diseases that all of a sudden were "discovered" and required a vaccine? I'm over 70 yrs old, had the few that were available then. We knew no-one with food allergies, auto immune probs, or anyone with neuro diverse problems such as ADHD, or worse, autism (brain damage, yes, that's what it is)! We don't need safer vaccines, we don't actually need any as long as fed and watered properly, enough sunshine and sleep!
Why do you think the diseases we vaccinate for after 1986 are fake? Do you think kids weren't dying of them before vaccination started? That's weird.
Why do you think there was no autism before the 90s?
From something that was quite rare to becoming 1/30, on various spectrum levels, is quite shocking, and this increase started to happen after 1986. Same with dementias in elderly, people generally accepting of a parent diagnosed as almost normal thing once they reach retirement. Why is this, then? Maybe because of the pretty useless flu jab they are encouraged to take annually. See Dr Chris Exley's substack on aluminium in brains, or, Trust the Evidence substack on the F word, showing how at least 8 respiritory diseases are counted as "flu cases" to inflate numbers so to scare people into an injection, when, in fact, true flu numbers are very, very low. You forget, pharma is a business, they were going under because of all the claims against them prior to 1986, so after, they were protected and helped them to suck up more taxpayers money with more vaccines. If you didn't know, mRNA was a failed gene therapy cancer injection, loads $$ spent trying for a new "blockbuster" which pharma needed because their patents on lucrative drugs all shortly to expire. It got rebranded as a vaccine instead, with help from friends who invented a new illness, changed the definition of both words "pandemic" and "vaccine" and rushed out all these jabs without testing for toxicity, cancer causing, or problems for pregnant women or their babies. We won't know for years about their fertility but already know of problems with fertility, more cancers, autoimmune, heart, neuro, etc. now. First, do no harm, is the motto.
Another hilarious Muppet - "We don't need safer vaccines, we don't actually need any as long as fed and watered properly, enough sunshine and sleep!"
We sure do get a lot of MDs who masquerade in the comments. How about revealing your credentials so that we know that you are actually accredited as a doctor and not just some random bot pushing propaganda on the internet.
Is JasonLT an MD masquerading as a sane person? Or is he masquerading as an MD?
You can have my office number 🧦, right after Siri's deposition in which he answers questions about which routine childhood vaccinations his kids received.
Or just DM me your phone number. I'll phone you from my office by 17:00 EST.
I try not to make a habit of calling wackos who are asking for my phone number online.
Yet you're demanding others provide much more than that.
VOIP and burner lines are available for a buck or two per month.
Stop embarrassing yourself.
I can't stop, because I never started.
BTW, Aaron Siri had to learn how to read scientific papers in order to be effective in court. What is education, primarily? Reading.
Wrong. He doesnt even understand basic p value parameters, much less the basic statistical tests used to determine the power of a study.
This is apparent. But he shows off for this crew by clipping 3 or 4 out-of-context minutes from a 9-hour adversarial deposition of an 85 year old man. His mother would be proud (if he ever had one).
The fact that he claims active placebos aren't real placebos tells everyone with any knowledge all they need to know about Aaron's deep well of ignorance.
Serously? A placebo, by definition, should not be active. It should be neutral. I think the well of ignorance is somewhere else. But then, you've just confirmed what I'd suspected.
What did you suspect?
Why not? What if you're worried that the adjuvant causing inflammation might make the vaccine look more effective than it really is? It should be neutral as to the outcome you're testing, but it shouldn't be neutral in any other way
None of those are RCTs used for licensing the vaccine. They do not refute his claim.
- JAMA Network: retrospective study, not a trial
- Science Direct: case-control study based on self-reported/recorded reports
- PubMed 31865602: meta-analysis of other studies, claims three trials included pregnant women but provides no specifics (possibly Zaman et al. (2008) - Bangladesh, Madhi et al. (2014) - South Africa, and Tapia et al. (2016) - Mali) and the quality of those studies is questionable
- NIH PMC6605784: retrospective review, not a trial
- PubMed 32402751: retrospective study, not a trial
- PubMed 34878959: retrospective study, not a trial, largely the same group as 32402751. Additionally, Helena C. Maltezou is the primary author and has previously disclosed funding from both Novartis and GSK despite stating no conflict of interest.
Aaron Siri's previous statement that you paraphrase is:
"We FOIA’ed the FDA with a simple request: Provide all the clinical trials relied upon to license the flu shot for pregnant women. They finally admitted we don’t have any clinical trials because it’s never been licensed for pregnant women."
This is correct. No trials used for licensure specifically tested on pregnant women, and the package insert itself does not list pregnancy as an approve indication. That said, the FDA also did not require this testing as a condition of licensing like they probably should have.
Why is the claim "no RCT with inert placebo before authorization" one that should be taken seriously?
May I ask why it is too much to ask? If it would put to rest the argument, why not perform such studies?
It's not too much to ask. It's absurdly unethical, ruinously expensive and unlikely to change anyone's mind. The current safety data about vaccines is incredibly good. There's no reason to think that people who are ignorant of the current state of the data would change their minds after one more study shows vaccines to be safe. There's no need to run a billion dollar unethical study that wouldn't convince anyone anyway. What is your perspective on this?
Does it concern you that the carcinogenicity, effect on fertility, and mutogenicity have not be tested on the vaccines? Some have answers on fertility, but, often, are only for men or women, not both.
Please, look inside the inserts at Section 13. For me, that alone is deeply concerning, unethical. Where are the common sense studies and/or follow up for these very real concerns?
What makes you think they haven't been studied?
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09655-y that shows that the vaccines make treatment of some tumors easier. They don't affect fertility
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19/large-study-finds-covid-19-shots-don-t-affect-fertility
What would be the mechanism for causing mutation?
And that's the point. To study cancer you need years. We didn't have years and there was no good mechanism for causing cancer. Now we know it's not cancer causing. Similar to fertility. They got approved before we knew there was no effect on fertility. And now we know.
So no. I'm not worried about those things. They're far from unethical. Why are you worried? .
Let's go through.
First link:
"This retrospective longitudinal cohort study"
Not a randomized placebo trial
Excluded 22% of births because they were "less than 20 weeks’ gestation, fetuses that weighed less than 500g"
This is nearly double the background rate of these severe life threatening adverse events.
Second link:
"Mothers of case children" "were identified from population-based"
Not a randomized placebo trial
Third link:
"Studies were included if they were: (i) observational"
No randomized placebo studies
Why is an RCT with saline placebo the right study design? What does it do better than the studies we've done on vaccines?
Why is an RCT with saline placebo the right study design?
-----
Ethics:
1) Using heavy metals as a "placebo" violates the medical ethic of "first do no harm"
2) Telling people heavy metals are a placebo violates the medical ethic of "informed consent"
3) Lying is unethical.
Science:
1) According to the "medical experts" Randomized placebo studies are the gold standard, the highest quality studies.
2) Likewise, according to them they are the only studies capable of determining causality.
Let's go back to the first study.
This study was paid for by the CDC. The authors of it were paid by Moderna, GlaxoSmithKline, Dynavax Hillivax Johnson & Johnson, CSL Seqirus...
This study had nearly double the background rate of life threatening events such as low birth weight and premature birth. 22% of births had these adverse events.
Who is using heavy metals as a placebo? How large would a vaccine RCT have to be to get to statistical significance on an AE that happens once in 100,000 doses? What if that AE is 1/100k in one demographic but doesn't happen at all in another one? How would you set up an RCT that big?
--Who is using heavy metals as a placebo?--
The Aaron Siri post you've commented on about half a dozen times tells you and links to it multiple times.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12421889/
In this study in table 1 the MMR vaccination was associated with with how much of a higher rate of autism?
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14754936/
In this study MMR vaccination before 36 months of age was associated with how much of a higher rate of autism?
https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/ANNALS-25-00997
In this study in the supplementary data figure 11 what were the only statistical significant results regarding aluminum based vaccines and autism? (Hint the authors used the opposed format and a -4.49 "autistic disorder" would mean a 4.49 increased rate of autism for aluminum based vaccines).
Answer those and ill do your p value calculation.
You can't control for confounders in a cherry picked table 11 outcome
Your last link supports my position
That first link does not use heavy metals as a placebo. Where do you think it says that it does? What are you trying to claim the second link shows?
Wow more lies from Aaron Siri. Quick 5 minute PubMed search shows a ton of vaccine trials with placebo that Aaron Siri pretends dont exist. Also he plays games by saying "routine" vaccines which he says rules out COVID vaccines which has DOZENS of saline placebo trials that he again tries to ignore:
https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa2109522
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37099299/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32877576/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33887209/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36260859/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35544369/
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11040406/
https://academic.oup.com/ofid/article/12/1/ofae718/7922586
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34043894/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33301246/
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2639-4
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34910859/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34192426/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36260859/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19428879/
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1627425/pdf/archdisch00769-0040.pdf
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1719924/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29752026/
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa052434
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14656755/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25316331/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22569484/
He categorizes excipient only comparators as "not placebo." From my comment above;
You object to excipient-only comparator arms, because they're not "placebo" arms. You would object to non-blinding if saline (placebo) were substituted for these inactives. Then, you would object to saline, because it's not just sterile water.
Siri objects to excipient-only comparators because they are NOT true placebos. The rest of your rant is just absurdly unfounded speculation.
But use of saline only would immediately unblind. So the trial wouldn't be "randomized, double-blind." Which would invite great criticism. What inactive comparators would be acceptable? In what situations?
"But use of saline only would immediately unblind." -- Says who? That's a false assumption.
No. It is not. Those excipients cause tissue irritation and discomfort. It's clear you're just parroting what you've been fed.
Again I ask, says who? In everyone 100% of the time? Where's your evidence?
The real problem is that adjuvants (or comparator vaccines) cause inflammation and immune activation that could be confused for effectiveness of the actual vaccine. If what you care about is "how effective is the antigen at causing immunity" then it makes perfect sense to make the comparison arm the adjuvant or a similar unrelated vaccine
Literally the argument for refusing to use a real placebo is that vaccines cause so many adverse events that everyone will know who received the vaccine because they will be harmed.
Adverse effects like sore shoulder or fatigue. Why is that an issue
In what way are they not appropriate placebos? Are you claiming that we don't know the safety of those comparators? Or that they present a misleading comparison? What are you trying to account for in claiming that the only appropriate placebo is sterile saline?
5 minute search? As I said, now READ them and see if they're legitimate. You are brainwashed.
Projection, cultist;
https://substack.com/@musingsandthoughts/reads
https://substack.com/@musingsandthoughts/following
They are lies! You cannot believe what the gov’t tells us. There are no placebo controlled studies on any childhood mandated vaccine. Gov’t gets much of their funding from big pharma. They rely on these payoffs. Huge conflict of interest.
No one is more conflicted than tort lawyers Siri and Bobby, who exist to enrich themselves suing big companies and selling books, subscriptions, podcasts and distortions to their believers.
Trump's billionaire Cabinet, many of whom lobbied for and/or ran oil and gas companies, hedge funds, massive corporations and dark money PACs - no conflicts there.
Bobby's supplement-selling, health AI company owning deputies - no conflicts there.
You did a great job yesterday demonstrating your incoherence. Show us more, Mami.
What problem do you claim would be solved by using a saline placebo?
You know these guys can't concentrate
As evidenced by the fact that they can't even answer basic questions about what they claim to believe
First link:
This is of the Covid vaccine, which Aaron Siri did discuss meaning you either didn't read his post or are a proven liar. Let's look a it though.
Figure 2 page 7
Compared to placebo both Covid doses caused around 15% of children to experience a local grade 3 adverse event**.
Both doses also caused around 15% of children to experience a systemic grade 3 adverse event.
A grade 3 adverse event is anything that prevents normally activity. For example being to sick to go to school.
So thank you for posting a link showing the Covid vaccine is unsafe and harmed tens and tens of millions of children.
This info is horrifying, I’m happy the truth is emerging. Covid helped that. After Pfizer C-jabs murdered my sweet husband I became fully aware of the poison in those jabs and did research on them and others. The truth is we’ve been lied to for many generations about vaccine safety. They are not safe or effective and never proven to be either. The lies are over many generations and our unhealthy children are the proof. Parents, open up your eyes, look around at all the health issues our kids have. Then look at kids health that are un-vaxed. Then you’ll know you’ve been scammed. Protect your children because they won’t!
Murdered your husband - details please
It’s a long story but I’ll briefly fill you in since you’re interested. Pfizer replaced their promoter in their C-jab with the SV40 virus which they kept from the FDA to get EUA approval. A promoter is designed to remove DNA which the original promoter did very well but it took a long time. So by replacing it for expedience they kept the info secret that the SV40 virus didn’t do the same job and left an abundance of DNA in the ingredients. Anyone with gene mutations (my husband had 3) should have been told not to take the pfuzer jabs which were gene therapy, not vaccines. It destroyed his immune system. Hence two (as they now call them) turbo cancers murdered him in just 10 days after diagnosis. Pfizer also kept many other truths from the FDA, but I believe I answered your question in the short version explanation. That’s the truth!
Don't need your jumbled science lesson. That's just destroying your credibility. HIS case - age, coexisting conditions presentation (and timing), etc.
Thank you.
I knew my explanation was a waste of time once I looked you up, now I know! Best of luck! You’ll need it!
A waste of time because you didn't describe the adverse event(s).
Your "explanation" was babble mixed with a few factoids.
SV40 is not a whole virus. It cannot replicate. It's a common lab sequence used for decades in molecular biology.
A promoter does not remove DNA. It's a control sequence that initiates transcription.
DNA removal in manufacturing is handled by purification steps (enzymes, filtration, chromatography), not by promoters.
The idea that Pfizer “replaced a promoter to remove DNA faster” is NOT HOW BIOLOGY WORKS.
Pfizer didn't “kept this from the FDA” to obtain Emergency Use Authorization. The manufacturing process, including plasmid design elements, was reviewed by regulators. Differences between early clinical batches and scaled-up production batches are normal documented
Should I keep going?
There are no known gene mutations precluding Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine administration.
I'm sorry for your loss, but you mostly just pasted incoherent jargon.
Please show any evidence of SV40 in any of the vaccines.
Please show dangerous levels of DNA in the vaccines.
Please show any evidence of an increase in cancer cases in the vaccinated vs the unvaccinated.
Please show ANY carcinogen that takes someone form no cancer to diagnosable cancer in less than 2 years.
My question is: when will a safe and effective vaccine be developed to protect the weak and vulnerable minds of captured media from falling victim to the sickness of virLIEogy and germaphobia? A “one & done” injection sure would be nice! Lacking that, I reckon multiple doses of “Injecting Freedom”will have to do. If only they would take their needed medicine! I wonder why we don’t witness them celebrating their freedom to decide for themselves? Maybe that question needs to be put to them more directly!
If viruses don't exist then you need to explain the difference in measles rates between USA and Europe.
You also need to explain how the current very effective HIV treatments work.
Yes Ryan! It is good of you to raise such points as you do here. I celebrate your freedom to decide for yourself. I hope that you are happy to extend that same freedom for others to decide for themselves too. For it is the lacking of societal support for that freedom over the last decade and more that has contributed to the rise to outfits like the one we are commenting on here.
I find it good that as a society we are being brought by these circumstances to look more deeply at the foundations by which we discern the value of the information that comes our way. Isn’t this consideration what has driven all of scientific, religious, and philosophical inquiry? And doesn’t such inquiry rightfully belong to each and every one of us?
And so l heartily cheer your own quest for answers onward. I hope you will indulge me in sharing just one source that I have found to be useful in my own quest. I would feel honored if you find it useful too. It is this link: 🔗
I hope the link works. It is my first attempt at posting one in my comment.
It’s absolutely shocking (but not) how little doctors and pharmacists are taught about vaccines.
And how tragic (but not accidental) that parents simply trust the person in the white coat…
And what an extraordinary business model: create chronic disease and then sell the drugs to suppress their symptoms!
I doubt there has been a larger tragedy than mass vaccination on this planet: brain damage, autoimmune disease, chronic disease, cancer, heart disease.
And all that is found, of course, first in a colicky infant (who may now have difficulty bonding with mom) with gastrointestinal distress due to vaccine destroyed gut biome.
God help those parents who do not research what they inject into their children.
My heart aches.
What chronic disease do vaccines reduce symptoms of?
🤣
Well, medication‘s can suppress symptoms like mucus production, pain and fever— of course never dealing with the root cause, but suppressing those symptoms
What vaccines suppress those symptoms in what people?
Indeed. And God help their poor children, too.
He really touched a nerve with this one. These comments are full of an unusually high amount of vitriol from what I can only assume must be paid actors.
Why would people need to be paid to rep facts?
Thank you! I will share far and wide. ps just about to start reading your book. Thank you for that too. And you podcast. And your work in the court room.
Thank you for your service.
Funny censorship going on, not the first time.
I can get to this comment thread by clicking the heart or message button in my email.
Yet if I try to reach the article via the URL I get the following error until I have visited it via the redirect sequence since restarting my browser. The machinery does not want to serve your pages to me (perhaps others) unless I approach them with a tracking link first.
"Hmm. We’re having trouble finding that site.
We can’t connect to the server at aaronsiri.substack.com."
This is the url that I tried (I wanted to share your post).
https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/fact-checking-the-placebo-control
I extracted it from the AARONSIRI.substack.com URL that I am now commenting on at my desk, it also often contains a lot of tracking data as a suffix.
https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/fact-checking-the-placebo-control/comments
There is a lot of baggage to clear
The long link in my email is a GMAIL.com redirect
which includes a long SUBSTACK.com redirect
that goes to a long
https://OPEN.substack.com/pub/aaronsiri/p/fact-checking-the-placebo-control?utm_source=substack&publication_id=516360&post_id=194072395&isFreemail=true&submitLike=true&token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo2OTgzNjQ5NSwicG9zdF9pZCI6MTk0MDcyMzk1LCJyZWFjdGlvbiI6IuKdpCIsImlhdCI6MTc3NjEwMzYxMSwiZXhwIjoxNzc4Njk1NjExLCJpc3MiOiJwdWItNTE2MzYwIiwic3ViIjoicmVhY3Rpb24ifQ.VDsMmxx3omiF7oQFKbSLxzWVlP6aQjipJJ0uP17eIdM&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=email-reaction&r=15ku6n
and finally to the short URL below and sometimes a longer one at the same subdomain
https://AARONSIRI.substack.com/p/fact-checking-the-placebo-control/comments
I appreciate the visitor data is determined from the redirect link that is used to reach your site IN PART but I still do not agree that I need to use it to reach your information. I feel that the large corporate big data systems can gain much more dangerous data about out networks than we can gain about our followers.
If you want to investigate the effect have a look to see if the raw URL can be reached from a computer or phone that has not visited your substack previously. It would be kind of underhanded if they prevented the spread without tracking the spread.
Your correct on all accounts...
Do you have any evidence for this claim?
Just curious. Did you send this list of facts to the fact-checkers? If so, any response?
Which fact checkers? Just curious.
The ones Aaron listed at the beginning of his article - CHOP and AAP.
CHOP is one of the prominent pediatric healthcare facilities in the country (and world). The American Academy of Pediatrics is THE professional society for pediatric physicians in the US, 100 years old.
Siri is a goniff ambulance chaser that went to Yeshiva University and clerked for courts in Israel. Where did he grow up and attend primary school? No one seems to know.
RFK Jr. spent 15 years, from adolescence on, as a junky with a trust fund and powerful relatives. His entire extended family has denounced him as a predator.
Oh look folks, it appears we have a pharma shill in our midst.
You're shilling for Big Tort.
The laziest criticism. But you clearly SHILL FOR TORT LAWYERS and "wellness" quacks.
Wellness is "quackery?" LOL! Thanks for proving my point.
Not to mention it looks like an attack on Siri because he's Jewish?
You know fact checkers are useless, I spent years researching so don’t give me that bunk! Any sympathy would have been appreciated. But I guess not! Don’t bull me, you’re alive, he’s not! Yeah I’m pissed off. How dare you!
How dare I what? Of course I know that fact checkers are useless. What I wondered is what, if anything, the fact checkers that sent him those studies that weren't studies. Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and American Academy of Pediatrics. Did you even read Aaron's article? This was right at the beginning. and who isn't alive? What in the world are you on about?
How were they not studies?
Reread the article. They made claims without any facts.
"That is because the reality is that not a single routine injected childhood vaccine on the CDC schedule was licensed based on a placebo-controlled trial."
Unfortunately, these days it is necessary to diagram every sentence, evaluate the meaning of what "is" is etc. In the case of the above quote, is it possible that while the licensing decision was not based on a placebo-controlled trial, there were in fact, placebo-controlled trial(s), but they were not used to obtain the license?
Surely Big-Pharma will seize on such distinction to discredit critics.
Do you really think if Pharma had used true placebos they wouldn't use those studies rather than the damning ones? Unless, of course, the outcomes were so bad that they didn't dare.
Why would true placebos be better than post approval monitoring?
First of all, if the rate of harm is high, then the vaccine would never be released. The harm would be seen beforehand. Second, post approval monitoring has been a failure. Once something is on the schedule, anything linked to the vaccine becomes "coincidence". Both Pharma and the so-called watchdog agencies are reluctant to admit an error--Pharma because it is profit driven and not health driven, and federal "watchdog" agencies because if they admit an error, then the federal government becomes liable for harm.
How would using a fully inert placebo show a higher rate of harm?
Show me an example of "Coincidence"
Well done - speak truth boldly!!!