73 Comments

I sure hope this is Gorsuch's way of saying he will rule against any attempt by the federal government to violate the constitution at the "command" of the WHO.

Expand full comment

Dear Aaron Siri, I love everything you said except for one thing: democracy. Not one time is the word democracy used in the beloved declaration of independence or our cherished Constitution. Why? Because democracies are teeter totters it is a tyranny of the majority and they are inherently unstable. Which is basically what you were talking about in your article. Our founders carefully studied democracy and found it to be woefully lacking. That is why we have a republic with the rule of law to protect minorities. The word democracy is used by the left and I think for very good reason they are no longer fighting for our republic. They are fighting for their version of democracy which is a tyranny of the majority.

During World War II Winston Churchill said democracy is a poor for the government but it’s the best we have. I beg to differ, I much prefer our republic.

If you remember the Pledge of Allegiance it says “republic for which it stands one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all.”

So I humbly ask you not to use the word democracy when referring to our form of government. I beg your mercy to ask for the word republic because it stands for far more than a democracy.

Democracies are folding like cheap suits in Europe. Despite what’s going on in our nation you yourself are still benefiting from our republics constitution and declaration of independence. Our nations forefathers were prescient and many things when they put together our founding documents. I only wished that they had listened to Geoffrey Rush when he asked for a medical bill of rights. Things would be much different now.

God bless you and everyone in your team fighting for our freedom and our republic.

Expand full comment

Cheers! Thank you for posting this. And thank you for standing for freedom.

Expand full comment

Oh, cool... Great... Thanks for acknowledging that Justice Gorsuch....

Next, can you please explain how justice will be served. Can I at least have my tax money back yet?

Expand full comment

Next step, recognize our inalienable rights to life and liberty in a court of law.

Expand full comment

Hmm. When we approached SCOTUS (no less than 3 times) in an attempt to stop this vaccine mandate madness, ALL of these justices rejected the idea any American has ANY right to refuse ANY vaccine, so long as it was unlawfully "prescribed" by any "State" legislature, no matter how SOLID the evidence which showed the vaccines are now poised to entirely collapse our Nation over the next 8 years via the physical destruction of the majority of the population.

And on our last approach (the 4th less formal) we confronted SCOTUS with direct evidence showing that they are ALL conflicted, (pharma interests, all of them). They ALL refused to follow THE LAW requiring them to recuse and to appoint a panel of judges that are NOT conflicted.

So yeah, sometimes they give lip service to what's right. But ALL of them are fully onboard with this depopulation agenda, knowing FULL-WELL it will lead to the collapse of this Nation in short order. Based upon the current trajectories, there is no chance our Nation will survive past 2030 if pharma continues to control health policy. And even if we did an abrupt turn today, it would still require a miracle to climb out of this.

In 2020, 48% of vaccinated Americans over the age of 18 had some form of heart disease, 11% had diabetes, 18% arthritis, 6% cancer, etc.. All of these previously-considered "old people's diseases" are exploding specifically in young working adults and CHILDREN. And the life-time risk of cancer already stood at 50% in 2020, also being the number one cause of health-related deaths in (vaccinated) CHILDREN. Mindful, this was BEFORE they rolled out the warp-speed death jabs.

On the other side of this however, is the fact that less than 0.01% of the entirely unvaccinated population (all ages) showed any heart disease, diabetes, cancer, arthritis, thyroid issues, or other serious conditions. Go figure.

Expand full comment

Remember when Amy Coney Barrett refused to hear college kids who brought forth a case against being subjected to experimental medical practices in order to attend school. How can you decide without information being presented in front of a court? Where was Gorsuch then? Or one year ago, Or one 5 months ago? I don’t think that what they meant by Justice is blind. Clearly they were hypnotized.

Expand full comment

More than any other period of modern history, attorneys have been the modern warriors standing up to protect our liberties. While it is sad they needed to be defended, they were defended nonetheless. I am thankful to read this article on Memorial Day, where so many fought for these liberties.

Expand full comment

I am glad someone in authority recognizes the truth.

Expand full comment

We may need another Declaration of Independence ... from

Our Federal govt tyrants

Expand full comment

Medical autonomy!

Expand full comment

"Governors and local leaders imposed lockdown orders forcing people to remain in their homes.". This is a myth or just people stupidly complying. I was not allowed to go to my school job but did everything else AND I lived in Cali, I regulary: hung out in multiple pubs and restaurants with no mask, flew (cheap flights!) across the country up, down and across multiple times, stayed in many hotels, went to the store whenever I wanted, biked and worked out so much that, at 57, have the body of a 25 year old, learned how to skate board with my son. The Plandemic was sort of paradise for me and time well spent with my son.

Expand full comment

Doesn't the first and 14th amend guarantee our freedom from needlerape and other Harmacide scamdemic hacksxxxxine injextions? What is to be made of our so-called natural immunities if no court will uphold them and instead mandate needlerape?

I believe the folks who think the fake vaxxxxines being unsafe is the reason to avoid them are the most dangerous, in that I understand our constitution grants me freedom from all viruganda and coercion, whether or not tis safe and effective. The viruganda itself is dangerous and the use of fear proves to be the biggest weapon of all. I have watched it kill, rather slowly, but I see him dying a little more every day, my triple jabbed friend....he took the booster just for the piece of paper, although he still claims it helped him, while he goes blind

Expand full comment

"At the very least, one can hope that the Judiciary will not soon again allow itself to be part of the problem by permitting litigants to manipulate our docket to perpetuate a decree designed for one emergency to address another."

Deep down, Trump's election was the "emergency" .

Expand full comment

The biggest lesson I learned was to look at the science myself.

I have read thousands of scientific articles and looked at many studies.

As a result, I know that

1. almost ALL diseases start with oxidative stress. If you take ANTIOXIDANTS, you not only get rid of "Covid" or adverse effects, but you can prevent and treat many other common and rare diseases such as diabetes, mental disorders, thrombosis, high cholesterol, ischemic strokes, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's and so on....

2. all "vaccines" are toxic, and why would anyone put poison in their body? If you want to treat oxidative damage, don't create it. Unless you plan to be a chronic patient of Big Pharma.

3. covid and the adverse effects of these injections are caused by nanotechnology/graphene. We were lied to about the Wuhan market and lab virus. Wrong. Nanotechnology crosses blood barriers, causes oxidative stress, so it causes low saturation/suffocation.

Here's a great article about what it does to your body so you can see what Covid is and why people have all these adverse effects:

https://particleandfibretoxicology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12989-016-0168-y Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and mechanisms | Particle and Fibre Toxicology | Full Text (biomedcentral.com)

The world will never be the same after this attack on our relatives and friends, on us, after so much suffering and so many lies to implement this horrific program of injecting people with nanotechnology, killing people with "masks," "tests," "drugs," breathing filters, etc. all containing graphene and other nanotechnology.

4 The biggest question that remains is how to make people aware that 5G is a deadly weapon against humanity against all of us. It is a military-grade weapon system, and it can't be a coincidence that it has been installed and people have been injected with semiconductors. Is this why they talk about AI threats to humanity? Is this mass murder being planned?

If we are to learn anything from this - why should we trust military equipment in civilian areas?

Expand full comment

Justice Gorsuch's thoughts are well articulated here, at least so far as addressing what should be criminal executive overreach, along with a disinterested and/or cowardly judiciary, but that was only one half of the corruption of our democracy. The other component lies with the half or more of the populace who willing embraced whatever absurdities were thrown at them without question and, even worse, enthusiastically narced on family, friends, neighbors, and coworkers who dared demonstrate even the slightest non-compliant behavior. The Stasi never enjoyed such devoted allies.

If asked, they would do it all over again the next time -- and you can count on there being a next time.

Expand full comment